Jump to content

Nationalist

Senior Member
  • Posts

    13,257
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by Nationalist

  1. 10 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    Dude, you were posting about a pride flag. I have no idea the provenance of that image. Let me know how the story turns out though.

    The story turns out with chicken sh1t Libbies like you, losing power, losing in your desire to sexualize kids, and being relegated to the trash heap of history.

    Have a warm and fuzzy day because...you don't have many of them left.

  2. On 4/26/2024 at 7:41 PM, eyeball said:

    Deluge didn't. Maybe you can't bring yourself to own it like he does.

    As we get closer to elections in the US and here we'll see more conservatives backpeddling and distancing themselves and especially their brand from the more over the top rhetoric that's been echoing around their chambers these last number of years.

    It's like I've pointed out before though your lack of convictions and courage always shine through the  brightest.  There's an army of pent up Randy Whites out there just itching to tell it like it is. You know you wanna.

    Ok...so there aren't any. You just use the labels for literary effect. Which means you're a lyin' sack o' chicken sh1t.

    Got it.

  3. 3 hours ago, Hodad said:

    "You can be proud of who you are" is sexual messaging to you? 

    Well, I guess if ones self esteem is low enough...

    genderqueer-1-1.jpg

    That's a school book?

    Today...it's not unusual for you to lie. But this has no place in school libraries. That you defend this trash only serves to further prove that you hate America and are an active enemy of the nation.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. On 4/27/2024 at 2:16 AM, robosmith said:

    It's clearly the idea that we are a Christian nation; which is explicitly prohibited by the 1st amendment and something Republicons have a hard on for establishing. Duh 

    Which you might know if you were an American and not so IGNORANT.

    Ah Ha! That's it isn't it?

    You Libbies are all freaked out about Christians because they can get a hard-on, and you freaks can't.

  5. On 4/24/2024 at 7:16 PM, Caswell Thomas said:

    I don't see how you could arrive at any indication that President Biden is involved ...he has no part at all in making border laws, that's up to the House and Senate.  He only gets involved when the bill has been hashed to death by the two parts and the MAGA's have stuck their paw in everything to try and screw it up.

    Ok...this is the dumbest post I've read so far today.

  6. 5 hours ago, August1991 said:

    Americans are sending money (paper) to China.

    China is sending stuff to America.

    America is sending paper to Ukraine.

    ====

    Am I wrong?

     

    With nothing in return.

    3 hours ago, robosmith said:

    What's obvious is that gnat boy called them "losers" just like Trump did. Duh

    I expect nothing better from the MAGA CULT cause Trump is their god.

    They volunteer, cause fighting for their country is better FOR THEM than surrender to Putin. Duh

     

    Dude...they are being drafted.

  7. 6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

    Their hatred, huge tho it may be, actually stems from other things. The percieved inequities is simply their 'vehicle' for expressing those issues because they can't otherwise in a politically acceptable fashion.

    They are mostly driven by jealousy, anger and dissatisfaction with themselves as a person.  And in some cases a sense of wanting to belong to something or some group, and really wanting that group to somehow be relevant.

    And rather than learning to be happy with what they have and improving it, or managing their anger productively, or improving their own confidence and who they are as a person or making friends normally, they lash out.  They will find something or someone that is' 'evil' and make it their holy mission to eradicate that thing.  To the point of ridiculousness.

    It has ALWAYS been this way. This is the so called 'But for' phenomenon.  "But for the Jews, our economy would be strong!"   "But for the class structure, you would have a turnip in every pot!" "but for evil white men, you would have freedom and prosperity!". 

    Etc etc.

    Conservatives tend to not allow others to be the excuse for their problems.  They just look at what is between them and what they want and figure a way around it. If someone or a specific group is deliberately personally blocking them then fine, they'll fight that group but only if there's no way around and only till they're past them.

    This is why we see all those reports and polls that show that left wing thinkers are far far more likely to have mental health issues and depression.

    Revenge of the nerds. 

    They've learned to put the females up front in everyone's faces, 'cause nobody wants to slug a woman.

    They are cowards...loud...disrespectful or downright hateful...vengeful little d1nks.

    They are a clear and present danger to society.

  8. 4 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

    Debate the topic without insults. Can you?

    No we have to overcome differences. Women can do any job that a man can do as well if not better because they do the job using both their brains and their hearts. Women are making good police officers, army soldiers, doctors and engineers, judges, and Prime Ministers too.

    Your suggestion that women can do certain professions and men others is dangerous. It reminds me from an Islamic fascist government who bans women from becoming judges and presidents and disqualifies them even before rigged elections. Down with Islamist fascists. 

    Over come differences? My poor misguided...person...we need to celebrate the differences. 

    I didn't suggest women "can" or "cannot" do anything. I said they "choose" different professions. They can choose to be whatever they like.

    You should stop worrying about quotas and worry more about quality. I'd bet that would produce better results...for both sexes.

    Oh...and either your reading comprehension is...lacking, or you're lying about what I said.

    Which is it?

  9. 7 hours ago, robosmith said:

    Because you imagine the woman who was shot didn't bleed?

    And ALSO all the cops who were beaten with weapons like fire extinguishers?

    It is YOU who LIES CONSTANTLY.

    Who had just broken down the door to illegally enter the House chambers soon to be followed by a violent mob.

    You've stated yourself you would shoot ANYONE breaking down YOUR DOOR.

    The cop has as much honor as you. Zero.

  10. 14 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    Every single thing I wrote there actually happened. It's on freaking video that you (yes, even you!) can watch. 

    Hang Mike Pence

    What do you suppose Trump did while his mob was hunting Pence? He egged them on.
    Trump tweeted at 2:24 p.m., while the attack was going on, that “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution.”
    "It felt like he was pouring gasoline on the fire by tweeting that," Sarah Matthews, a Trump White House staffer, said in video testimony.

    ^^That's what he did publicly. Here's what he's alleged (in sworn testimony) to have done privately (and totally in character) and keeping with what he said on record to Jon Karl. 

     

    Go peddle your lies to other fawning sycophants. 

    Well that's all very cool but.  It's here say.

    Not provable.

    Thus...in your own favorite words...you have no proof.

    That and...ya...up yours.

    Relish your own tactics Libbie.

  11. 49 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    You posted ONLY BELIEFS with NO OBSERVATIONS.

    Are you STILL disputing that inequalities exist? Why?

    You've not demonstrated hypocrisy, ONLY STATED YOUR BELIEFS.

    ANYONE can SEE inequalities, except it seems for you. They ARE obvious.

    I said NOTHING which proves your point. 

    Nothing about superficial characteristics nor hatred.

    You made PRESUMPTIONS AGAIN. 

    That is YOUR BELIEF that the REASONS are "superficial."

    How about you explain YOUR case that your videos show "hatred" for superficial reasons.

    Joy Reid is celebrating the PROGRESS made by black people prosecuting those who advocate their OPPRESSION.

    Are you claiming the OPPRESSION of qualified blacks is "superficial" ? AKA means nothing or doesn't exist.

    Are you through making an a55 of yourself...again...?

    What inequities do you see?

  12. 30 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    Why can't you answer my simple questions. I asked you nothing about the source of your OPINIONS.

    We already know how skewed they are by "what you see," because your cognitive dissonance is a really strong FILTER and your sources are PROVEN LIARS. 

    Ok. China did get involved in our last election and Trudeau new about it. He's already paying for his stupidity. His own side dislike him now. Shortly after Trump starts his second term, Pixie-Dust will be disposed of.

    Isn't it strange how collusion actually looks like a Libbie tactic?

    Hillary, Hunter, Brandon...all have had their "collusion" with assorted Russians and Chinese.

  13. 1 hour ago, User said:

    You don't have to say these things explicitly, they are the logical deductions from your comments. You try to argue that Ukraine was trashing people to support Russias invasion and then put conquered in quotes to support Russian invasion. 

    That is what you are doing. You are playing this up as Russia just saving the people from Ukraine to justify their actions. 

    It is, quite frankly, not very accurate at all. Especially because you are completely ignoring the fact that Russia is the one who was meddling in those regions, arming the separatists and infiltrating them with Russian operatives to cause the problems in the first place and their "vote" to separate was about as legitimate as Putins continued wild success in his "elections"

    So, I have to ask myself, just how willing of a participant are you in pushing Russian propaganda here? Do you know what you are doing or are you just repeating it without much critical thought?

    Also, Obama had been sending military aid, not sure where you get he stopped. He always had an issue with certain types of weaponry, I don't think that was because Obama was upset that Ukraine killed some civilians in isolated incidents when trying to fight armed insurgents backed by Russia. 

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/obama-trump-biden-ukraine-military-aid-1.6371378

    Obama sent blankets. That was the talking points of the day remember?

    Trump started sending arms in 2018. Back then...

    https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/canadian-officials-who-met-with-ukrainian-unit-linked-to-neo-nazis-feared-exposure-by-news-media-documents

    We were being warned that the Ukraine military had neo-nazi freaks and maybe couldn't be completely trusted. Then...as if by the magic of the cold war...Russia makes its "minor incursion" and poof...the Azov Batallion becomes the recipients of new arms and bales of cash. "Poof".

    On the other side Putin, a Russian president that has been surrounded here by accusations of election tampering and "collusion" with Orangemanbad. The ultimate sin. I always found the sequence of events leading up to this...a little too convenient. Simple yet..."plausible". Sellable to at least half the population right from the onset. A cakewalk story. Anyway...

    Russia attacks. They enter eastern Ukraine and North aimed at Kiev. Air strip, military installations, targeted. Nothing about that northern incursion made sense. Sh1t or get off the pot...and they just sat there. It was weird. But as Russia was drawing back their forces in the north, a treaty was being negotiated. The one Johnson killed.

    Since then, hundreds of thousands have died. None of this was necessary. Frankly I'd like to charge Johnson with a war crime.

    Today Russia has regrouped and expanded its troops about 5 fold. If Eastern Ukraine was being negotiated before, it's lost now. Maybe even Odessa. 

    America sends 61 billion in "aid"...to arms producers in America. Oh I'm sure some more drones and missiles will be sent, along with some cash, but the cost here is higher debt for us, and what? We can pat ourselves on the backs for feeding them so they don't die today?

    What is needed is a negotiated peace deal now.

  14. 2 minutes ago, User said:

    It just gets worse... Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine across multiple fronts, including a head-on attempt to take Kyiv. They continue to push on all fronts beyond any land you talk about. 

    You might as well be working for Putin as a propaganda agent on this forum now for the kind of crap you are pushing with Ukraine "trashing" their people. Ah yes, of course, and the good and benevolent Putin is just protecting those good people from Ukraine... 

    So much for the moral equivalency game, you are cheering on Russia now. 

    I never said Putin is benevolent or even a nice guy. I'm saying Ukraine cannot "win" and needs to negotiate with the Russians for a peace treaty.

    As soon as Donbas and Luhansk voted to separate, the Ukrainian military began shelling civilians. Not even Obama could bring himself to send military aid under those conditions. 

     

  15. 3 minutes ago, User said:

    Oh sure, its the moral equivalency game. Everyone is to blame, everyone is equally bad, so who cares if Russia invades and conquers Ukraine. 

    I get it, its an awful argument, but would have saved us some considerable time to just have been forthcoming with it much sooner. 

    Most of Ukraine is still there. Russia has not "conquered" anything but the lands of the folks Ukraine was busy trashing.

    Question: Did the harshness of the Treaty of Versailles after WWI, have anything to do with the reasons for WWII?

×
×
  • Create New...