Jean-Kevin

There is just one Quran. Ok it is true in theory and it would be the Samarkand Kufic Quran because if I understood correctly all the copy and paste is done on this Quran, the one of Muhammad's time would not exist anymore (or only parts of the Quran). Now this Quran was written in Quranic Arabic (French is arabe littéraire and Irak is a country that knows how to speak this Arabic from what I understand ) and notably Abou Bakr al-Baghdadi come from Irak so he is his terrorist group to more legitimize to speak and know Islam that a lot of Muslims because he is normaly in knowledge of the Arabic language written in the Quran. Then the problem is that there are also other Muslims who know how to speak Arabic and who have a different theology from ISIL. We can also take note of the existence of the Koranists people who reject the ahadith and who have a less criminogenic vision of Islam than ISIL. To these people the fundamentalists answer that without the ahadith they cannot understand anything of the Quran so it seems to me more complex than limiting history to the Koran especially since they also talk about context.

(I copied and pasted the title of a topic from a French-speaker forum) What is radical Islamism ? For simplicity, it is the Islamic theology of ISIL ( Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - Wikipedia ). If I understand the title of the topic in the first degree (in the strict sense of the words). The problem is in Sunni Islam there isn't only the Koran but also the sahih ahadith (who are also used by ISIL). So In other words, the question is rather : In theory, Radical Islamism is when the Muslims try to practice the Koran and the sahih ahadith 100% ?

Actually, it is not really the individual Charles Manson in himself who interests us but the fact he is a guru whose people have done bad things under his mental control. In other words, the case of Charles Manson should warn us against psychological manipulation.

"True Crime Story: Was Charles Manson Born To Kill? (Psychopath Documentary) | Real Stories" Just I inform, Charles Manson pretends to be a reincarnation of Jesus Christ.

"Birth of Krishna - Sri Krishna In English - Watch this most popular Animated/Cartoon Story" In this video you can have an idea about Krishna and you can understand there are similar things but it is not same story and there is no "the history of direct inspiration" like Islam with Christianity or Christianity with Judaism (it is not same story but you can't say story of islam no report with story of Christianisme and Judaïsme). Then, the manipulation of Abrahamic religion is about with the falsification of history and the stupidity of people to believe History can be an exact science who cannot be distorted for political and/or ideological reasons. When we talk about journalism we talk about current or near history and even if the current history is more relevant than the very distant history because we live in this current history, there are plenty of fake or false news.

It is possible to do the same thing with Muhammad but the problem it is in the end of story, Momo is a pedophile guru, a war chief, a slave driver... a lot of negative things, magic tricks not very difficult to do who let I think in his existence. The case of Jesus is : - full of miracles - born from a virgin - a guy who can die and come back to life - it is himself god It smells like a fake or a mythological story. Then if you look at the story of Krishna (existed before the story of Jesus) you see he is Vishnou avatar (it is god or a god), he born in a almost similar way, he is Messia awaited... full of similarities and this is put in the mythology story box.

(Official) MV BISMILLAH (2013 Edition - ENGLISH) Everything is so grotesque in islam that it is impossible for me to know if this video is for fun or if it is serious.

When genocide is fiction that means fictional victims, that means no real victims. It seems to me Hitler said he hears the voice of providence, and after ? When he does genocidal acts it is not because gold told him or because Bible told him, I think you need to look for the real reason. Then, did Bush do the genocidal acts ? No he didn't. Yes the fictional facts have no real value for me.

I'm listening "Fox News as an '80s Power-Pop song" :

I don't excuse Yahweh for these bad acts as I don't excuse the assembly of deities who decided to destroy the humanity for these bad acts in Epic of Gilgamesh just the problem it is fiction, we are talking about fake genocide. Then for the believer who wants to believe it. It is necessary to know the teaching it makes of this history. I never see a "credulous" Christian or Jew will find as teaching that as a man I can decide to carry out genocidal actions because my god has already done so. Then Bush and Trump were presidents of the United States, they are the religious right and they don't do the war or set up genocidal actions because god told him.

There are other characters made in Abrahamic religion whose existence is contested like Adam, Eve, Abraham or Moses but the case of Jesus is more interesting because we don't really know even if the propaganda who wants to make us believe in his existence incites us to believe in his non-existence because we wonder why to make so much sophism with false proofs like the Shroud of Turin if there are serious proofs going in the sense of his existence. In the Christ myth theory there are things who seem to me to be wrong, like the story of Horus and Jesus. Another problem it is to assert a non-existence as if it could really be proved and the absence of proof is not a proof of its absence, just when we make people believe in an existence who would be proved by many elements of proof when in reality there is nothing or almost nothing, there is manipulation or deception.

"Did Jesus Even Exist ?" Youtube video and you can find another videos of him about Jesus or rather someting to go Jesus is a complet fiction. I don't know if there is a Yeshua ben Yosef would have existed but this personage don't need a matérial basis to exist. Every element of his biography seems to be modelled on a text from the Old Testament.

I'm also not politically correct but it is not something about bullshit racialist I can find on internet like "race and IQ" but it is about the religious and/or sects. Exemple, peoples (Marwan Muhammad who was director of Collective Against Islamophobia in France - Wikipedia if you need name) want notably to impose the crime of blasphemy by calling islamophobia and if you critical islam you are racist, you are in the politically incorrect. Other exemple, Jesus can be a historical fake. Richard Carrier says it's more lickely that Jesus never exited but of course it is raciste, politically incorrect because it offends the faith of believers.

The problem with muslim people it is not immigration or Arabe. The problem it is islamic ideology (you can say there are many islamic theologies but the one that dominates is in my opinion a theolgy that is close to Abou Bakr Al-Baghdadi) integrist group and islamo-collabo (this it is not a name so serious and you can contest its releance but when you support a groupe like Muslim Brotherhood and you do intellectual terrorism with an anti-racist rant by minimizing the seriousness of something quite serious you are for me an islamo-collabo).

I know the existence of incest by notably Raël's religion who incites pedophilia by his scared book. And in the movie The Fearless Vampires Killers of Roman Polanski there is something about incest.

Yes because I am a new member and I commented to make sure that everthing works, if there are still active members etc. Then when I whrite or comment I don't realy waste my time because I'm also learning English even If I'm not good at languages. Then the question it is too obvious so I think it is a good idea to post here but one moment I stop to post in this kind of topic.

Racist it is for exemple I hit a African woman just beacause I don't like the African women. In the storry told, the reason it is not racist so it is not racist.

Yes incest it is a bad thing but I don't think it is a serious question because there is something disgusting, disturbing.

(Sorry I'm not English-speaker). Hitler is catholic and he is also a politic man who follow a racist ideology. I think for the NSDAP it is not evil what he does because Jews are evil and he want destroy the evil people for the good of the German people. So if you are not Nazi it is evil but if you are Nazi it is good. This is same for the bad action of Yahweh, Allah but the problem it that confuse fiction and reality. Who can seriously believe in the historicity of Noah's Ark ? So it is different with the Hither's genocide because we are not talking about fiction.