Jump to content

Aristides

Senior Member
  • Posts

    12,701
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

Everything posted by Aristides

  1. I see you have not answered the question. Do you ever fact check Fox?
  2. I did look at it and what it says is that anyone who is vulnerable should have to hide.
  3. You still have no clue how to "protect the vulnerable" other than locking them away for the forceable future so you can play. Like they have no right to any kind of life.
  4. After the vaccine was approved Pfizer notified the Johnson County control group that they could be vaccinated. One would assume that this was for their safety, not some kind of conspiracy. Maybe they shouldn't have but one of the placebo group did die from covid, so maybe that was the right decision.
  5. You do understand that the issue is Pfizer wanting to release only 500 pages a month to fulfill a FOI from the FDA, not 500 pages total. Are you downloading 500 pages every month and reading them? To fulfill the FOI request as demanded by the FDA they would need to release 80,000 pages a month but they say they don't have the capacity to do that. If they do, are you prepared to read all of them? I've seen it but like most of those who propose to "protect the vulnerable" and let everyone else do their thing, they have no idea how to "protect the vulnerable" and the declaration gives no practical details on how to do it.
  6. You are so uneducated about professional ethics. Doctors can't do anything they want. They can't give you a prescription for heroin just because you asked for it.
  7. All 500 pages? What did they say?
  8. What about them? Have you read them?
  9. Doctors are professionals and have to abide by professional standards. That is for you protection.
  10. Doctors are not allowed to write exemptions for non medical reasons. A doctor in CT had to surrender her license because she was mailing out signed blank vaccine and mask exemptions. And so she should, I want a doctor who is a professional, not an activist. Our public health will follow up if you tick the box on the questionnaire that allows them to contact you.
  11. There you go again, Your reject vaccines that have gone through three stages of approval involving hundreds of thousands of people as experimental but accept anecdotal articles about some nursing home in France as proof that Ivermectin is safe and effective for everyone,
  12. After all our shots our health region did email followups on any reactions we may have had. Of course doctors can write exemptions but can't sell them like some quacks were doing.
  13. It is an anti parasite drug, Covid is a virus. It is totally experimental for use with Covid patients. All drugs affect people differently and not all drugs are recommended for ALL patients. No one is being forced to take the vaccinations and if they have medical issues that make a vaccine problematical they will not be given it. That's why you fill out a questionnaire before getting a flu or covid shot.
  14. The comments were about Pfizer's covid pill, not the vaccine. Ivermectin can also cause serious liver damage if mixed with alcohol and is not prescribed for patients with liver damage or cancer patients. In fact, not a lot is known about it's complications or drug interactions because river blindness was all it was used for in humans until covid came a long. But you guys would never look into or care about its side effects or interactions. The use of Ivermectin in humans for Covid is totally experimental but you don't give a shit because it fits your conspiracy narrative.
  15. How is that different from any prescription drug. Almost all can interact badly with some other drugs. Do you ever read the info sheets that come with prescriptions? Has a pharmacist never asked you what other medications you were on when you went to get a prescription filled? This stuff isn’t a big secret. Even things like Tylenol and Advil can cause serious liver damage over time when mixed with alcohol. Says so right on the container.
  16. Assuming you are right about the 1000 vaccinated who have died, that is 1000 out of over 30,000 total. Question? Do you ever fact check anything you see on Fox or do you just accept it as gospel?
  17. So basically Fox is your Pravda. I assume you approve of mobs assaulting seats of government and hunting down representatives. Holding those accountable for inciting and taking part is somehow a witch-hunt.
  18. So unless Fox verifies it, it never happened. That would make Fox your sole source of information.
  19. It tells you that if you think Covid can’t touch you, you are wrong. Don’t fall off your bicycle and break a bunch of stuff because there may be no paramedics to take you to hospital or people to look after you when you get there.
  20. There are tons of articles if you bother to do a search. It took me ten seconds to find them.
  21. I brought this up back on page 6 of this thread and no one wanted to touch it. Now it is becoming a reality. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/coronavirus-covid19-canada-world-jan2-2022-1.6302053
  22. And you pull out an even bigger canard, everyone who died after being vaccinated was killed by the vaccine.
  23. Ya, I know, everyone who dies from Covid had something else kill them but everyone who dies after getting a vaccine died because of the vaccine. Antivax logic.
  24. Even VAERS says that is BS. As of Oct 6, 877 met the CDC definition of Myocarditus with another 636 under review out of over 400 million doses given. Most of them not severe. You have kids dropping like flies. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-10-20-21/07-COVID-Su-508.pdf This is what happens when you get your "facts" from Facebook. https://fullfact.org/health/pfizer-teens-myocarditis/
  25. Bullshit. A complaint has been filled by some Brits listing all the Q's favourite bogey people. The ICC has done nothing. That's what happens when you get all your nonsense from the internet.
×
×
  • Create New...