Infidel Dog

Canada's Delta Variant drop doesn't look anything like India's. Would you like to see another place that does though? Try Florida: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/florida/ Coincidentally it's the same story but with a different therapeutic. They started making Monoclonal antibodies easily accessible in late August. Observe the precipitous drop in the graph line. And if you're into charts and graphs I can show you another one of Africa. In Africa some countries have been using Ivermectin for river blindness since the 1990s. The guy who thought of using it won a Nobel prize for it. Charted out you'll see the African countries where Ivermectin is cheap and easy to access are doing amazingly well in comparison to the countries where it isn't. Or did you want to tell us some more about what Big Pharma is telling you about India.

But the wave we're experiencing now is the Delta variant wave. It peaked in the 5,000s and is in the 3,000s now. The Indian Delta variant peaked in April. It plummeted like a falling boulder right about the time they made Ivermectin accessible. Or at least that's the way it looks on your chart. The Delta Variant spike rose in Canada about the same time vaccinations were sky rocketing. The Variant in India dropped when they started using Ivermectin. And stays low. According to the Wall Street Journal only about 31% of the adult population of India is double-vaxxed. And you can still buy Ivermecitin from India over the Internet so it might not be in the government guidelines anymore but it's still available. So look at your graph again. Or check out WorldoMeter's:

Yeah maybe, I don't know. It doesn't seem important enough to go back and review it with my tape measure of the eye. But hey, you know what I do find interesting? I was talking about this with somebody else on another thread. There's this thing people do in discussion. I notice it most blatantly with what I call 'Progs." I used to call it lassoing but now I'm calling it 'Progressive Cowboying.' Basically they can get a herd of information. They lasso some withered, diseased runt out of the herd bring it to you, present it and expect you to believe that's what the whole herd looks like.

I'm wondering if we still get a Halloween. No kids at my door last Halloween. You can still watch scary movies but the powers that be back that. They support fear wherever they find it.

Are you sure your masters won't ban Christmas? https://www.alberta.ca/covid-19-public-health-actions.aspx That's Alberta though. They throw Priests in jail for public gatherings there. So no Christmas services would be my guess.

That one is obviously a pro Ivermectin article but I've been reading the mainstream anti guys too. I've noticed some stuff in those that I find interesting. First of all there seems to be a massive desperation to "debunk" that began in early October. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the National Task Force on Covid-19 dropped the use of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) drugs from their revised guidelines for the treatment of the infection in late September. Make from that what you will. Notice they didn't actually make it illegal or even less accessible they just said they would no longer support it. If you want medicinal Ivermectin now you can either jump through hoops and hope to get on a study or you can order it from India. Apparently there's a big demand for it. Write that off to the Streisand effect. Also I notice a lot of the arguments from "debunkers" are kind of lame in that they attack things they support in other places. For example, I think it was the BBC, or maybe was the Alberta Government was telling us how Ivermectin studies couldn't be taken seriously because some of them were observational. But I was discussing masks on another thread and got linked to a pro mask collection of mostly observational studies. I think it's more a case of who was doing them that was the "debunk" there though. There's favored and unfavored scienceytists. Most interestingly though I noticed this mass desperate debunking of Ivermectin all began about the time Pfizer and Merk announced they were coming out with pills that used the mechanic of protease inhibitor. This is what's supposed to be what makes Ivermectin useful as a treatment to ward off Covid. I heard a theory that Big Pharma is starting to worry accounts of adverse reactions from and waning efficacy of the vaccine are getting too prevalent. It won't be possible to keep the information closeted from the gullibles much longer. They're going to need a different place to shake the money tree.

I have one for Delhi but it only covers up until June. Ivermectin use began in late April in Delhi. You can find that graph here: Ivermectin obliterates 97 percent of Delhi cases

@ TreeBeard I'd prefer to get information from a combination of Science, consensus corporate or even other media Sciencey and common sense observance. I've offered that combination throughout the mask portion of this thread. You chose to cherry-pick one bit and offer it as a general 'debunk' of the whole package. I notice you fanboys of the narrative do that a lot. Why is that?

Oh and Aristides: the purpose of such videos is to offer an idea graphically of how much aerosol can escape and from where. It doesn't need to show you how much escapes in normal breathing. That would, of course, be noticeably less graphic. But the point is aerosol can and does escape and that is undeniable.

Actually he does show the smoke traveling without the mask. Unfortunately the video is presented to start at the money shot where he's vaping with the mask on. If you'd started at the beginning you would see he takes a puff and vapes without the mask. There's a noticeable difference in amount but not distance. Nevertheless the fact remains much of the vape escapes with the mask. I've also seen a video of somebody vaping through a mask in cold weather and a painter showing how much paint manages seep through around openings even with a painter's mask. Also there's a video of a scientist doing a study showing how aerosol lingers in the air as opposed to droplets which drop almost immediately. I'm noticing mask fans like to encourage you to think of the virus as traveling in droplets rather than on carpets of aerosol. My reading tells me the actual virus is - I think it was - 600 smaller in diameter than the smallest hair on your head and travels on an aerosol particle that is about half the size of the holes in your average drug store face diaper...or...pardon me...mask.

If you're going to measure what's necessary in relation to say the flu, then yeah, Death stats would be what you'd use. As far as the 90% figure goes, I'm not sure. Pretty sure I saw that somewhere. Let's look at Canada. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1228632/number-covid-deaths-canada-by-age/ My math is less than expert but isn't that about 90% over 70 of those that died of covid as of October 15?

Why? Who said that? I think that's where we should concentrate our efforts. Kind of like what they do in Sweden.

Speaking of hoaxes... Remember when we were told if you took seriously claims that the CCP virus started in any way other than somebody eating bat soup in a wet market that didn't serve it rather than the bio lab up the road you were the victim of a conspiracy theory? That one's pretty much a conspiracy fact now.

Epidemiologists or virologists and other experts. But not just the ones you approve of or the ones that have been pressured into getting in line. Like the 27 "scientists" who signed the letter to the Lancet assuring anybody who'd listen there was 'nothing to see here' as far as Covid originating in a lab in Wuhan. Then it turned out:

I'll give you another example of how the "crisis" of Covid is exaggerated to hoaxy proportions. The fact something like 90% of fatalities happen in the over 70 age bracket. That matters when you're trying to scare teenagers. Or even 30 year olds. Or even 69 year olds.

28,000 deaths from Covid and not with Covid is not so much exaggerated as it is what you were previously wondering about when you questioned the possibility of hoax. It's also what Spiderfish was talking about when he noticed how you guys don't seem to notice comorbidities except when you think it might help your argument.

Maybe she didn't think you knew. Maybe she was checking to see. BTW, you did know the unvaccinated can get and transmit covid, right. The clot shot does have therapeutic properties. However, although the side effects are marginalized by the machine that provides information to the gullibles other therapeutics have shown themselves to be much less bothersome.

They didn't. They simply changed the definition of reputable. Covid exists. It's the exaggeration of it and the resulting power surges depriving the populace of pre-covid rights and freedoms that is hoaxy.

I think she already knows. She also knows infections and harms to the vaccinated are rising statistically as vaccine efficacy drops. I've seen it as low as 20% with, I think it was J& J.

What do you want to know?

Actually the studies done by the manufacturers originally said 95% efficacy. That's changed drastically. 95% looks like nonsense now that we've seen them in action. Worse for some vaccines than others but they all wane in efficacy over time. 2 to 8 months depending on varying factors. That's another reason stats for the vaccinated start to rise from the first hysterical weeks of an infection wave.

Power centers externally and in the bureaucracy. Messaging from cherry-picked approved sources is all that is. That's why you have to wear masks. It's not because they work. They don't. Ultimately it's about power and who wants you to know they have it. It's not really the premiers. They're just the secretary who sits behind the desk and lets you know the policy. Same with Trudeau and Biden.

Look the end of the world was supposed to happen in Ontario too. Did it? The cases are falling now. You can look back and show me. Go ahead. Show me.

I see, so the rest of the hospital can look like a Ghost Town but everybody is in the ICU. Is that it?

The crisis is. I've seen the odd patient being held in the hospital hallway though. That was before Covid.