Infidel Dog

This guy below thinks the happenings over the last couple of day may have changed everything. Starting with Texas and the other 7 states suing the 4 swing states. I think he makes a good by being well supported argument:

A record 71 million actual voters and 7 states that don't want their votes stolen hope you're wrong. In fact, I heard their reply:

You missed one. Billionaire leftists like Mark Zuckerberg skirted election laws by donating large amounts to front organizations like the Center for Tech and Civic Life. That money was then used to finance organization of how ballots would be counted. Activists like BLM were then put in control of the polls. This is how the Dems could thug march poll watchers out of the building or block view of what was going on.

Is it Bejing Biden or just Bejing?

Really? You TDSers have a leader now, do you?

Come to think of it and seeing as you want to talk about cults. Isn't one of the key identifiers of a cult the way they rely on the practice of 'smear, slur and slime' rather than present an argument based on sources or common sense? See cause I heard it was, and I keep being reminded of it every time you reply.

Do you really live in a world where you think the far left British rag, The Guardian is "an American news source?" Now I'm just a Canadian who hears stuff and lack the expertise of a British Communist (apparently such opinions Trump those of Supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, do they?) but can you ask one of your British socialists this then? Don't state legislatures ultimately decide what electoral votes go to the electoral college? As I understand it they haven't done it yet and it's December 9.

Why would that matter if the ratio of the mail-in votes Democrats to others remained the same. If 50% of those mail-ins weren't Democrats how could 80 to 100% be for Biden? That's even assuming they'd already counted all the walk-ins.

Funny thing about those early statistics. I just looked at the Pennsylvania one. It says Democrats were returning ballots at only about double the rate of all others. And yet I've heard the ballots when they were actually counted were between 80 and 100% democrat for the questioned times in the questioned counties. What would you say the odds of that are, if true. One in Quatrillion, maybe?

Really? You're not just being snotty? Because you didn't seem to realize that Professor's statistical argument was already set to be presented before the supreme court? But if I did misunderstand I apologize.

Who knows? However we may find out. Did you read the piece you're claiming expertise on?

A judge like Ruth Bader Ginsburg for example? She's already offered her judgement. But you have a Canadian news network's opinion, right? Is that all?

Not according to Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis and apparently Ruth Bader Ginsburg. They say Trump has until Jan. 6. But hey, who are they to argue against Global News, right? If we're talking about the same case then no, you do not recall correctly. Alito only denied emergency injunctive relief. The case is still pending before the supreme court.

Why are you so sure the Supreme Court won't hear any of the challenges?

or if you prefer you can watch him here: or if you'd prefer to click neither but pretend expertise on both, no problem... I can post the entire text here.

Damn... Double again. Can you please just put the edit button back where it was? Surely I'm not the only one who can't adjust to the hidden button.

It has yet to tried in a court that will take a serious look at all the evidence. We'll see what happens when it is. Wanna see a mirage though? Professor Proves Probability of Biden Winning Is ‘Less Than One In A Quadrillion’ Now there's a real mirage for you. A quadrillion to one mirage.

Yes it was. It absolutely was. I watched it on video with my own eyes. They told us the polls were shut down and counting would resume in the morning. But that isn't what happened. I know because I was watching. After the poll watchers left or were pushed out that night new ballots started arriving and were counted. In Michigan street people started arriving at the TCF center in Detroit pulling carts or carrying sacks of stuffed ballots. In Georgia they lied about some broken water main, pushed everybody out of the counting room pulled wheeled cases from under a table and started counting. The woman in charge of that was earlier caught secretly slipping a USB to an operative who was earlier caught on video angrily discarding ballots. USBs are alleged to be involved in the corruption of voting machine counts. But you want to tell us 'don't believe your lying eyes again.' It's becoming like a chant with you guys.

I don't think a Progressive Conservative pushing the pajama boy Andrew Scheer model of conservatism. has any right to lecture anybody else on what a "real conservative" is. For one thing, I doubt there is such a thing. I'm with this guy: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/what-is-a-conservative/ The Ronald Reagan model of conservatism might not have always been faithful to the idea of lowering taxes but it believed in it. Basically it was bring more money in, improve the economy and the ship will with proper management, eventually right itself. Trump claimed to have a plan to deal with the deficit but stage one was get the recovery going better after Obama's recession.

The only story that matters now is Jenna Ellis telling us it's not over until January 6. In the meantime for those of us who know the "road to serfdom" begins if Biden/Harris are allowed to take over and the Dems are allowed to cheat again in the Georgia run-offs, it's like this:

Possibly not, but his policies of lower taxes, less regulation, personal rights, private property, strong borders and rule of law are. if you prefer the Biden/Harris ticket though you're welcome to them. Just don't try to tell us you're any part of right wing.

Or as Rand Paul put it:

Jenna Ellis says they have until January 6 to make their case. https://populist.press/jenna-ellis-we-have-plenty-of-time-the-ultimate-date-is-jan-6-not-december-14/ She also says Congressman Mike Kelly's case before the Alito and the Supremes was only denied emergency injunctive relief. It is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. Kelly, just getting a supreme to address his case has had a welcome side effect though. It seems to be activating the GOP. 7 states have joined the Texas suit making it's way to the supreme court. The Two Senators in the Georgia runoff were hesitant to come out in support of the lawsuits. Now they have: GA SENS. DAVID PERDUE AND KELLY LOEFFLER ISSUE JOINT STATEMENT OF SUPPORT FOR TEXAS SCOTUS ELECTION LAWSUIT And Ted Cruz has activated: Ted Cruz Issues Rebuke Of Supreme Court Snubbing Republican Challenge In Pennsylvania Kelly's suit getting attention from the supreme court got it going but the Texas lawsuit is the one that matters right now. http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/the-texas-lawsuit-is-on-the-docket-the-supreme-court-will-determine-the-fate-of-the-2020-election And this one below is fun. A Michigan State Rep threatened Trump voters with repercussions and called on the military to make it happen. A Marine replied. Turns out the rep is not as tough as she thought she was. https://populist.press/michigan-house-rep-warns-trumpers-calls-on-her-soldiers-to-do-it-right-make-them-pay/

I keep finding stuff Arizona Republicans did that I'm wondering if Argus is aware of. Arizona Supreme Court will hear GOP mail-in ballot challenge or detailed here:

Also what exactly are you alleging the Republicans of the other 4 states did or didn't do that they should or shouldn't have done as Republicans? What did they do or not do in Michigan for instance? Jocelyn Benson is a Democrat.