Dougie93

I am not under any onus to prove my principles, logic defends them until such time as they fail me, which they have not, trial and success for the win.

They are doing exactly the opposite of what any professional economist would advise them to do, they are doing the exact opposite of what any national security professional would advise them to do, so I don't see why they would be taking DFAIT's advice neither. This is not Pierre Elliot Trudeau, this is Kathleen Wynne, who is a dingbat, who did everything for the purposes of influence peddling in order to perpetuate influence peddling. This Trudeau Government, is a classic Self Licking Ice Cream Cone.

I don't think these clowns listen to the professionals, if they did, they wouldn't have made their own VCDS into a political prisoner for giving them sound advice.

I am not against anyone's principles, because I do not subscribe to the concept of thought crime. I simply defend and uphold my principles, logic does the rest.

I am not against any groups, I am only for liberty, being against things is pointless, as you cannot prove a negative.

I don't think they actually believe all that pap, they're just stealing the NDP platform verbatim to render the NDP irrelevant so the Liberals can rule the gulag indefinitely. In terms of the MP's, I just think they are there for the cushy job and pension and to see what shady backroom influence peddling they might profit from. Two Global Hegemons smacking them around from the highest levels I think comes as a complete shock to them and they haven't quite oriented themselves to what is going on yet.

As for White Supremacists, they don't bother me, because I'm white, so whatever, if non whites want to quarrel with them, knock yourselves out, I personally, just ignore them. /shrugs

The House of Windsor's only quarrel with the National Socialists was that when they flipped sides to the Italians, they then joined the Italians in being astride the route to India and the Far East beyond. So we (royal we) declared war on them at Poland to defend the Empire. Other than that, the Jewish Bolshevik Conspiracy and associated revancism is of no concern to us (royal us).

Well I take no pleasure in the tears of the downtrodden, but the pathetic blubbering of Hollywood Liberal Panty Waists warms the cockles of my coal black heart like plutonium

Far right is no slander, I wear it as a badge of honour, as extremism in defence of liberty is no vice.

It's not the Canadian government who is blocking China from cryptographic access to the UKUSSAN Internet of Things, no doubt the Eskimo Commies are the Fifth Column of Beijing, but this is simply a mutiny against that Eye by the other four Eyes, led by the Big Two, in defence of Starfleet Command at Fort Meade.

In the end, all "Impeachment!" is, is DNC fundraising. Luckily for Trump, he doesn't require campaign financing, he has no problem reaching his base by Twitter.

It is amusing how the liberal media is pumping the left up for another fall, I mean, the looks on their faces was priceless on election night last time, I cant even imagine how hilariously pathetic they will be this time, but I have my popcorn standing by.

The only way to commit treason in a Cold War is to pass classified information to a foreign power, but since Trump didn't have a compartmentalized security clearance when he was merely a candidate, no possible way for him to do that.

Impossible for Trump to commit treason as a private citizen running for election by exposing the Democrats Party's dirty little secrets by way of Roger Stone and Wikileaks. Nothing in the constitution which precludes, quite the opposite, it's all constitutionally protected free speech. Moreover, treason requires the Russians to be sworn enemies of the state, which they are not, because no war has been declared against them by Congress and only Congress has the power to do that.

And also Op Desert Storm was kind of a bust. You can win by Falkland Islands War, but it has to be dramatic, a walkover doesn't stir the soul of the nation.

And only because he tacked hard to the right with Triangualtion after completely botching his first term.

I'm quite confident it will be impossible to gain a two thirds supermajority to remove a sitting President from office, even if the Democrats held the Senate, which they don't. /shrugs

The popular vote is irrelevant, the President is not elected by the people, elected by the electoral college, the purpose of which, was to prevent election by popular majority and force election by district. The only country is the Declaration of Independence and associated Constitution, which does not preclude collusion with anyone to win an election, unless they be designated enemies of the state by formal declaration of war under the Hague Convention, which Congress has not invoked since 1941 Ergo, /shrugs

Otherwise known as the Obi-Wan Kenobi effect. Amusing character as Tricky Dick was, he was pretty much a liberal, the Nixon coup de tat was the greatest gift the American left ever gave the American right.

Clinton's base rallying around him post impeachment making him more popular than ever with a 73% approval rating.

The fact that you invoke the popular majority and not the electoral college, merely illustrates your ignorance as to how Presidential elections in America work. /shrugs

JIMWD is another one of the deluded who thinks impeachment equals removal from office, which requires the Senate to convict by two thirds super majority vote. lol, good luck with that, Lefties. By all means impeach, please do, it's a trap, put your necks in the noose for us, lets see you do it.

Trump is going to win in 2020 easily, it's not even a contest, even impeaching him will not result in removal from office by the senate, slap on the wrist, and like Clinton, he'd get a big bump from it if they try.

Like Little Boy at Hiroshima.