9-18-1

George Soros is the global broker for immigration-based Islamic jihad. https://www.therebel.media/_it_s_a_conspiracy_fact_soros_trudeau_plot_refugee_scheme http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2017/04/the-metropolis-project-and-george-soros.html http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/10/36524/

Watch, learn, connect.

Problem #1: Trusting any "professional news organization" Problem #2: You don't know the black market George Soros - ANTIFA is a domestic terrorism organization funded by Soros. He makes money by creating domestic chaos. Recommend: https://anonfile.com/ddp2p6d2b5/Q_s_posts_-_CBTS_-_3.9.1.pdf See the link above. The connections are all spelled out. Some excerpts: https://imgur.com/a/nSWjf Why did Soros transfer his bulk public funds to a NP? Note this doesn’t include massive slush funds that are pulled by several high ups. Why did Soros’ son have several meetings with Canadian PM and how is that related to Clinton’s? What happens if Soros funded operations get violent and engage in domestic terrorism? Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory). How does Soros, Obama, Clinton, Holder, Lynch, etc all net many millions of dollars (normally within a single tax year). Where did the $18b from Soros go? ...etc. Some articles alluding to the type of business Soros is really in: http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/20/george-soros-illegally-bankrolling-campaign-to-amend-irelands-constitution-government-watchdog-says/ Excerpt: Soros uses a network of nonprofits and partner organizations across Europe to try and affect the outcomes of elections in foreign countries, leaked documents show. (RELATED: Leaked Docs Show How Soros Spends Big To Keep Populists Out Of Power In Europe) Soros uses his billions of dollars to support candidates who favor his open-borders worldview and oppose populist candidates around the world. As first reported by The Daily Caller, Soros secretly paid the salaries of Moldovan government officials, including the prime minister’s chief of staff, between 2013 and 2015. Those payments were funneled through a German non-profit in order to skirt laws preventing Soros from directly paying the officials. (RELATED: Soros Secretly Paid Foreign Government Officials) The 87-year-old Soros transferred $18 billion to OSF in October, ensuring his organization will continue advancing his far-left worldview around the globe long after he passes away. Soros’ son, Alex Soros, has stepped up his own political activities in recent years as his father has gotten older. Other articles that allude to his meddling: https://www.trunews.com/article/irish-government-watchdog-sees-soros-shenanigans http://www.mystatesman.com/news/the-latest-polish-president-says-critics-are-lying/Z2hew5TwAx4fKGDOdt1thP/ http://humanevents.com/2011/04/02/top-10-reasons-george-soros-is-dangerous/ https://www.rt.com/op-edge/332387-soros-putin-russia-threat-migrants/ When we are talking about Soros, he has been doing this a long time - he hides his behind-the-scenes work really well, but it's all starting to bubble out.

My post is not anti-Muslim; Muslims are people. My posts and references are regarding political Islam and the various forms it takes. It is very real. Regarding Sharia Law, you don't seem to understand what it is. I'll clarify once again: 1. You can not criticize the Qur'an 2. You can not criticize Muhammad 3. You can not criticize Islam. ...the rest of Sharia follows from these, but the first step is to engage these three. M-103 is exactly this; empower the Left to call people "Islamophobes" to dilute and eventually eradicate criticisms of Islam; very similar to how you are dismissing this as anti-religion/xenophobic, which is nonsense. These tactics are intentional and have a desired and calculated efficacy. If anything, the joke is on you for not realizing just how deep all of this runs. Do you understand the connection Huma Abedin had to the MB? The connection H. Clinton had to the Sauds? The recent eradication of all the social networking share-holding Saudi princes? How George Soros has taken over for them in continuing the civilizational jihad? Do you see the connection between Soros and Trudeau? Trudeau and Aga Khan? Have you read the biography of Muhammad? Have you read the Qur'an? Have you studied Sharia as taught by Islamic scholars? Do you recognize how the NWO creeps are trying to use Islam to sow discord in nations? Have you looked at Sweden lately? Britain? Germany? Do you know raping non-Muslim women is a form of jihad? Do you know collecting jizya from Non-Muslims can take many forms, including social assistance? Why are the vast majority of the migrants Muslims? Where are the Christians who are being persecuted and constantly having their churches suicide bombed? Where was the recent sex trafficking ring sourced back to? Would that be Saudi Arabia? Why would Trump suggest the Muslim immigration is a "Trojan Horse"? Why did he immediately move to ban immigration from Muslim-majority countries? Why didn't H. Clinton give a concession speech upon Trump's victory? Why did B. Obama send billions to Iran in cash/wire the last 90 days of his presidency? Suppose the pay-to-play donors who "were assured" that H. Clinton would win required their respective refunds? Why would B. Obama push the Iran nuke deal? If you can't draw these simple things together, your head is not even in the game and frankly you have no business posting such dismissive rhetoric. Your ignorance on the scope of the matter is actually insulting to the people who have/are suffering as a result of political Islam; and rest assured, that number is in the hundreds of millions.

1. If you are so moved as to audit sources rather than the information they contain (including the veracity of such) you are deflecting. 2. Yes; I actually produce substance, whereas you produce rhetoric, and were reported for doing so. You add nothing to the discourse but rhetoric. I provide analysis and corroborating sources; and I could not care less about your discrediting them, as I have provided many. 3. Deflection; anything which enables/empowers fascist regimes are dangerous. 4. This is rather serious (say hello to covert Sharia/Anti-Blasphemy as alluded to in the first post): https://www.thestar.com/amp/news/canada/2017/12/21/board-member-of-anti-racism-agency-fired-amid-accusations-of-islamophobic-commentary.html 5. They are; and they have been provided with multiple analysis and sources, whereas you only use rhetoric. I trust their judgment on such matters much more than I would expect them to treat your rhetoric as anything but disingenuous and frankly rather base; devoid of any meaningful substance. In the meantime; feel free to continue your rhetoric, as that seems to be your sole modus operandi. I will take the advice of the kind moderator who was well to advise me (upon reporting your posts as being without substance and mere rhetoric) "just ignore him". I shall do so, and those who read this discourse would likely be well-advised to follow suit. As I imagine it, most individuals have already taken this step without need of prompt.

Oh, and here is another: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/12/ontario-human-rights-tribunal-says-imams-call-to-buy-from-muslims-only-is-not-discriminatory Excerpt: In a sermon uploaded to YouTube…Rageah called on Canadian Muslims to unite and translate their demography into a political and economic power which will enable Muslims to implement Sharia Law in their communities and change Canada’s foreign policy. Do you feel stupid yet? Don't bother; I feel it for you already.

What on earth are you talking about? Fox news? What does a sovereign nation which values freedom of speech have to do with Fox news? I already explained in detail why Islam is more fundamentally the problem than the Left; the Left is not responsible for over 270 000 000 deaths and the delusion of billions who are forced to follow a false doctrine. Neither is it responsible for the internal conflict of Sunni-Shia which is responsible for the death of hundreds of millions more. That would be Islam, not the Left. This is pretty obvious to most, save yourself as you seem to try to equate the Left as being worse than a fascist regime responsible for half a billion dead and billions deluded. How do you justify this "wooly (sic) headedness (sic)"? Islam uses the Left as a political conduit through which to enforce Sharia and non-military jihad. They have been doing it for ever, it's just globally coordinated now due to technology/logistical developments and "help" from people like George Soros. Are you employed by him to post such deflections from reality? I don't understand your reference to "spend trillions" to defend values. Defending values doesn't cost anything, because those values are intended to be there in the first place. What does in fact cost tremendous amounts of money (taxpayer) is the Islamic jihad doctrine of Jizya: payment to Muslims by Non-Muslims. This is your social handouts that, instead of going back into the country, it goes into the "cause of Allah" which is systematically penetrate political/social/economic/financial institutions and bodies until the "infidel" is subdued. I'm sorry if you are unable to see the reality of the situation; perhaps it will only sink in when someone close to you is raped by a gang of Muslim men: http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/20/protests-rage-in-sweden-after-cops-tell-women-to-stay-inside-to-avoid-gang-rapes/ Oh, and by the way, here is an article for you regarding the need to understand "jihad" since you don't seem to: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/12/raymond-ibrahim-will-the-return-of-jihad-to-intelligence-trump-decades-of-indoctrination Excerpt: President Trump’s new national security strategy is set to return words relevant to understanding Islamic terrorism — such as “jihad” — that had been expunged from the Intelligence and Defense communities’ lexicon, most notably under the Obama administration. According to the new strategy document, “The primary transnational threats Americans face are from jihadist terrorists and transnational criminal organizations”; the document also vows to “pursue threats to their source, so that jihadist terrorists are stopped before they ever reach our borders.” This is significant on several levels — the first being as basic as “knowing one’s enemy,” which President Obama had refused to do. In 2011, it was reported that “the Obama administration was pulling back all training materials used for the law enforcement and national security communities, in order to eliminate all references to Islam that some Muslim groups have claimed are offensive.” I underlined the parts which corroborate my previous claim that former president Barack Obama was/is a political jihadist, because as this article indicates, the Obama administration intentionally removed training materials referencing Islamic jihad tactics. Parallel this with Trudeau refusing to recognize known terrorists as terrorists. With that, I (and most reading this) can very easily conclude two things: 1. Your head is not even in the game regarding the severity of this issue and/or the true nature of Islamic jihad 2. Everything I have posted in this discourse is accurate and corroborated all over the place So rather than doubling down on your nonsense rhetoric which is always completely void of substance, why don't you pick up a book. I don't think you are convincing anyone here except yourself. Now for the whole forum to see; what is your deflection now? Deflect, deflect, deflect... sounds like the same jihad tactics used by these fascists supremacists. Get over yourself, and it, preferably in that order.

There is no need for a "plan B"; the Left will eventually realize their stupidity - just sooner than later would be better. In the same way any given Muslim has a degree of insanity each Lefty has his/her own threshold of realizing the problem is with Islam; their only obstacle is all the social jihad transpiring in the Western nations; hence the need to make a stand on Western values such as freedom of speech/expression/assembly/equality which I alluded to earlier. You seem to be opposed to that, which is a sure way toward fascism (as Islam is). I'm almost beginning to believe you're apologetics for Islam is your intention here. Here is Andrew Scheer bringing the needed attention to the matter of Trudeau visiting Aga Khan creating a major conflict of interest; obviously this all relates back into Islam: https://ca.yahoo.com/news/trudeau-conflict-interest-part-pattern-231500710.html

You say this defies reason, I say there is a reason. Now temporarily "detach" from the nonsense in your mind and perceive the following: Islam simply means this: submission. To what? Sharia: 1. The Qur'an is the perfect, inimitable word of Allah - the one True God 2. The "pattern of conduct" of Muhammad is to be used as a framework to "give your life for Allah in jihad" 3. Muslims believe the two above to be 100% correct; thus Islam is 100% correct (can not be questioned) 4. The Qur'an is a concoction of Syro-Aramaic Christian liturgical texts; it is not the word of God. This was discovered within the last 20 years of German scholarship; see Christoph Luxenberg. 5. Realize; Muhammad and Islam are/is insanity due to the Qur'an not being the perfect word of God, thus invented by Muhammad rather than from any "Angel Gabriel", thus Muhammad's Allah is likewise invented by him, who condoned such things as raping women in jihad as a means to instill fear; the same fear Muhammad used by referring to eternal hellfire to scare subject into strict adherence. 6. Look at Sweden. 7. Realize the "narrative" of the Qur'an is systematic; it is meant to "work at all times" in terms of attaining global conquest via jihad. Islamic "jihad" is a permanent fixture in creation (presently), ever since 1400 years ago. Muslims thus see all waking life as "jihad". 8. Realize "jihad" is not only military, but non-military as well: social, political, economic, financial, media-based etc. There is not a single subversive tactic it does not employ upon the West at all times, because war with the "West" is already the default assumption in Islam. 9. The "Left", due to their ignorance (as you point out) capitulate to it in ignorance. But this ignorance is based on war tactics being employed by Islam itself which is a false doctrine. This is how people like Justin Trudeau rise out of obscurity and all of a sudden he's opened immigration and based his entire conduct pro-Islam. Read above: Islam and Muhammad are/were insane. Thus, Justin Trudeau (had he the ability to realize the error of his own way) is likewise insane (though perhaps to a lesser degree) than those who control him. Now those who control him are using war tactics based on a false doctrine; were it not to be believed, much is solved. 10. Understand that both Christianity and Islam are idolatry-based religions; they utilize central figures (Jesus and Muhammad respectively) to sow attachment of the people to that empire. They are idolators and actually completely break the Ten Commandments (all of them) blatantly and outright, especially Islam which is insane. 11. In Islam, the concept of "cause and effect" is actually dismissed. Thus, they dismiss the relative scriptural concept of "As Above, So Below" which applies to both, because it is in the Torah / God of Abraham (Allah) narrative. This is why "idolatry" first finds "form" in the mind, then manifests on earth in the form of "following examples" of dead men. The only power over these minds are the ones perpetuating the false doctrine; they are sick men. 12. If Islam did not operate based on a false doctrine, they would not be a permanent aggressor responsible for all forms of jihad which is responsible for hundreds of millions of deaths (probably much much more) and billions insane/deluded. If this is eliminated (along with nonsense Christianity treating the sun in the sky as having been a physical man) then human suffering would substantially decrease. Thus both Christianity and Islam must collapse/reform because they are both false doctrines. Thus the problem, still, is Islam. It is not the Left; the Left's problem is that they are stupid, and they deserve what comes. It has nothing to do with the Left being "worse" or the right becoming encumbered with the requirement of "thwarting" (as you put it) the Left's own stupidity: a different kind of insane thinking is imposing here. The insanity starts in Islam, not the Left. It is a false doctrine and the doctors of it (in its entirety) are liars and insane people who merely wish to own women as property, beat them, blame them for the woes of the world as Muhammad did, rape non-Muslim captives (Sweden), subjugate the "infidel" etc. It is already inherently divisive by this means, thus we have the Sunni-Shia split, which is a war within Islam itself based on disagreements between who are the "real Muslims" and who are the "hypocrites"; hemorrhaging human suffering ever since Islam began. They're both wrong. This wound in humanity has been the basis for all Middle-Eastern conflict (the Roman Catholics having started idolatry with Jesus circa Constantine), which attracted who? The military industrial complex. People made a fortune exploiting the followers of Islam/monotheism because they could be easily controlled and made to die in the name of nonsense books and idolatry figures. Masons especially love them for this reason. Therefor I can openly predict basic scenarios; this world will never know peace until Islam either: 1. Is challenged as an institution by the "rest of the World" who recognize it as the greatest threat as time goes on. 2. It is toned down and/or made much more moderate/liberal (Mohammad Bin Salman - can he do the right thing?). 3. Islam consumes the earth (as long as needed) in an all-out global jihad; but controlled by the leaders who base their power upon false doctrines; not the Muslims themselves, they will always be slaves to higher "controllers" because their doctrine is false. That world would die into the hands of, what one refers to as "Satan"; systematic control over what you do and say, and what you don't do and don't say. Slaves; in the "lands of Egypt" which is the first energy chakra (red) of the body, to say the least. Thus Islam is actually Satanic, because the sum result will always be slavery owned and operated by a higher power controlling it from the top; because it is false. Muslims see all of this as "will of Allah" but it is not. That's why the "globalists" such as Soros are making a fortune with having caused the immigration crises. See how I drew everything back to current day? Because it is all true; Islam is insane and empowers sick people who care not for human suffering at all. 4. Both religious bodies challenge their own respective authorities. Muslims rise against their leaders and Christians rise against the Jesuits and Vatican and all the other nonsense lodges and families, and challenge them for answers (I'm not advocating violence). This would be the "happy ending" to all this; but the dogma/brainwash is extremely potent and , as I have laid out, makes people literally insane. However, this sort of commotion could only be stirred by a literal Second Coming, which will never happen. That lie has enriched the wallets of many. There is this reason then that Islam is categorically worse than any political party. There is no argument to be had about this when you understand the scale of the global "conflict" in terms of a "humanity being free" perspective. And here M-103 starts with the empowerment of the Left to silence those who (rightfully) criticize Islam by calling them an "Islamophobe", thus shutting down the conversation. This is social jihad, and a very nasty one. Hardly noticed by anyone, but if Legislation passes anything based on that motion, I assure you, Sharia is already here and working as intended. You can't really stop it after that when you have Muslim Brotherhood sickos using fear tactics on people who rightfully call their prophet an insane man and Islam completely wretched. It will be too late then, as it almost is in Canada, and most certainly is elsewhere in the West presently. Canada is actually in better shape, but only because the Left is in control. The chaos over Trump winning in the U.S. is because Clinton was "slated" to win. But she didn't. Thus Trump is actually a genius, not insane as the Left is trying to constantly character assassinate him. He sees the problem, and is acting accordingly. His move into Jerusalem was perfect, and his recent refusal to have the U.N. dictate what the U.S. should and should not do, Trump essentially said "enough is enough with this nonsense" just as I would have done. For those who don't oppose Islam; get ready to live in it and find out why being a Left sympathizer to all of this nonsense will cost you all of the liberty you have left to exercise even basic things like freedom of speech. That's the power of Islam. You don't know it unless you've lived in it. Try. All based on a false doctrine which has been proven to be false by recent scholarship, to which I alluded to in earlier posts, had you cared to note. What are the implications? Thus: 1. The Qur'an is not divinely inspired 2. Muhammad was a liar 3. Islam thus creates perpetual chaos and human suffering, just as happened in the life of Muhammad, because Muslims actually imitate him, which is idolatry, which is forbidden in the commandments. So is bearing false witness: every single Muslim had to have performed the shahada, which is a witness testimony "I testify that there is no God, only Allah, and Muhammad is his final prophet". They thus bear false witness. They kill in the name of Allah via "jihad" which is another. They covet the possessions of others to further the cause of Allah etc. They actually manage to break all ten of them. How is this so? Because it's a false religion which is a destructive force in the world as a whole. So who is to hold them to account, then? Not even I can say; though I hold to all the scenarios I provided above; if any divine intervention were to happen, be it that these monotheists wake up out of their dogma-induced fear-based stupor and actually develop their own minds and question their authorities. That would actually help the Left out from waking up out of their stupidity. Islam could actually save the Left in this reverse scenario. Thus, the burden is on Islam, not the Right. It's the other way around.

https://ca.yahoo.com/news/canadian-press-newsalert-ethics-watchdog-171821224.html On the contrary; the Left is always asleep.

The left is more responsible than Islam itself yes; Islam has existed for 1400 years, and was much, much bloodier the further you go back. The left is being penetrated via political jihad (that's why you see this only in the Left) which is a calculated doctrine of the various forms of jihad in Islam. You don't know that doctrine because you (grant my own presumption) haven't spent the last three years researching this topic in detail, including: origins of Islam, origins of Qur'an, rise and fall of empires, religious persecutions etc. and placed it within the context of the 25920 years cycle to which the Bible wholly alludes to, perhaps you may see this all a bit differently. Books I suggest: https://www.amazon.ca/Syro-Aramaic-Reading-Koran-Contribution-Decoding/dp/3899300882/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1513762657&sr=8-1&keywords=christoph+luxenberg https://www.amazon.ca/Hidden-Origins-Islam-Research-History/dp/1591026342/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1513762695&sr=8-1&keywords=hidden+origins+of+islam https://www.amazon.ca/Astrology-Testament-Lost-Word-Regained/dp/1564599302/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1513762726&sr=1-1&keywords=lost+word+regained https://www.amazon.ca/Who-this-King-Glory-Christos-Messiah/dp/1461190363/ref=pd_sim_14_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=JTP2EJ6ENKW24N4695ZV https://www.amazon.ca/Original-Sources-Quran-Clair-Tisdall/dp/1110537778/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1513762903&sr=1-2&keywords=original+sources+of+qur'an These references adequately outline the "reality" of Islam through (very recently in German scholarship, as early as 2000) providing the accurate account of the Qur'an; that it definitely being derived from Christian-inspired Syriac Liturgical pieces in at least some areas (likely all), and Muhammad having been a rather disturbed individual (to say the least), now you understand the priority of Islam: protect the Qur'an, protect the image of Muhammad, protect Islam. The Muslims believe this man was a prophet of God, but he was a sick man. Simply read his very first historical account, from the earliest Islamic source: https://www.amazon.ca/Life-Muhammad-I-Ishaq/dp/0196360331/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1513763136&sr=1-1&keywords=life+of+muhammad He was a sick man, and everything turned into an absolute bloodbath; both within Islam itself (read how many heads were removed in these times) and Islam's tremendous expansionist regime, perpetuated by the Caliph Al-Malik. When you see the sickness that bread this ideology, and how far it is away from the truth (no excuses for the Roman Catholic Empire either; they stand equally guilty). So we have, then, myself and Mark Twain sharing precisely the same view of Muhammadans. They are insane; and thus are the people that can be misled (pro-Islamist Leftists/Apologists) into capitulating toward them. This is precisely what is happening in Europe, UK and now Canada, and Australia; you might think oh gee, what's the common denominator, given the references above? Over 4 billion people on this planet are (literally) insane, but each only varies in their own particular degree, because each individual lives in their own "Maya"; the closest true definition I suggest as "perception relative to an owner of five unique sense organs". As such, what you perceive is not only without, it is within, as is the sun in the sky, the motions of the bodies on the "heavens"; we are each bound to our own. That's why I am 31 and am seeing the signs; Jesus died at 33 because 33 cruxes; when the physical sun "dies" on the horizon on Dec, 22, remains still for 3 full days, and then resurrects on Dec. 25. It is as such the sun (Christ) is within every individual, because it is a physiological process that is aligned to the celestial movements; each individual is directly bound to that sun in the sky they perceive, because that's the "timing" of their own Christ. Those who are beyond this age without recognizing Christ being within simply endure a progressive recompense; him/her suffering their own actions. There is a word for this: it is called "karma", which means "action/doing". Thus, each individual on the planet is their own doing, and those who are ignorant of Christ, descend by eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Who holds the most currency in knowledge of good and evil? Religion; that's why it is clear almost half of the planet are dwellers under this tree which manifests such disgraceful acts as such. Over 270 000 000 people are dead just as a result of Islamic jihad alone. Two hundred and seventy million. Now if you will excuse me for asking the question "what is the source of human suffering" and trying earnestly to solve it, but this is what I have surmised: monotheism (Christianity and Islam) is the source of almost all human suffering on this planet. There is no competition; no other brother on the street, no other game in town. These two institutions control the minds of nearly 4 billion people; all based on lies and deceit. Forgive me for sounding off about it; but whether or not you agree does not make it untrue, and I presume any who read this and has a reasonable mind, they ought to know to also see it so. There is nothing else to know: Islam is using non-military jihad to weaken one of the prime staples of a free democracy: freedom of speech. Here are your 4 pillars: 1. Freedom of Speech 2. Freedom of Expression 3. Freedom of Assembly 4. Equality The West has capitulated and capitulated deeper and deeper into the jaws of Islamic non-military jihad warfare. Now if the west were smart (but I can almost guarantee based on the present level of "awareness" of the public this won't happen) they would make an neutral gesture toward a public-access discussion which embodies these four pillars inherently. For example: The West prepares venues wherein any individual may come to openly discuss Islam; it can be debate style, but with mutual respect, because that is a pillar of the west; equality. Yes there would be a great need for security because of how "sensitive" Muslims are to their religion being criticized (hence all of the protectionism around the book and prophet) but by preparing such a venue, the West is promoting their own three pillars utilizing equality as the central bases. See, in Islam, there is no equality "in the end", only in the beginning. Read the Qur'an and you will understand why the early passages are peaceful. Hint: it progressively gets worse after that for a reason, because certain "events" such as jihad don't "kick in" until specific points/status. Islam is inherently "at war" with every non-Muslim controlled (house of Islam) as a default position, therefor they never need to "declare" it; it has always been declared. This was the delusion of a sick man; conquer the world and have all the women I desire. Muslims believe they are getting 72 virgins in heaven. The Syriac original word is actually "grapes" and referred to Christian imagery of "Heaven", which is fictional. That is the state of "human suffering"; man-made religions based on lies, all hiding the fact that the sun is inside of you, thus Christ is in you. Why don't they teach this as a preliminary for every religion? Well, it is taught in the Bible; forget about Muslims understanding the gospels, they probably never touch a Bible, and forget about Christians who neither know Jesus' teachings from a hole in the wall; Jesus is the sun, and in the context, everything makes sense; the cosmic cycles. These religions don't teach those; they teach hatred and divisiveness, and the Qur'an is a wretched book for this precisely; it divides humanity into "believer" and "unbeliever" in Islam, and thus always divides humanity in two. Now observe the various divisions which stem from that, such as "real" Muslim and "fake" Muslim, the Sunni/Shia split which has killed millions upon millions. I wish I had the words to make these people see what is right in front of their face.

Actually no, they don't. Christianity is based on a lie started by Constantine that Jesus was a man, as God in the flesh, who died for the sins of all of mankind as a sacrifice that they may be forgiven. In the 4th, 5th, 6th centuries, if you were approached by one of these so-called "Roman Catholics" they gave you two options: confess Jesus as Lord, or lose your head. This is present-day Vatican. Jesus is the sun in the sky; the four gospels are the four solstices/equinoxes of the sun is it passes through the ecliptic consisting of twelve zodiacal signs - the sun surrounded by twelve posts, or Jesus surrounded by twelve disciples. Judaism is based on the original mythologies of the ancient Egyptians when "Christianity" (treating the sun as Christ) was pure. Knowledge was derived from these cycles (astrology), hence the monuments and astrological alignments, hence this knowledge later being used for "evil" in the dark ages, which is where Christianity and Islam arose; the age of Pisces (age of belief). The basis of Islam is a belief that the original divinely inspired texts were corrupted by man and that the Qur'an is the perfect, inimitable, unaltered word of God, and Muhammad is the best pattern of conduct for one to follow. The Qur'an is a collection of Syro-Aramaic Christian liturgical texts which were poorly translated into "Arabic"; Muhammad was retro-fitted into history over 100 years after the events are reported to have taken place. It promotes things like taking non-Muslim female sex slaves as a means to subjugate/humiliate the infidel. All of them are based on lies, in the following split: 1. Christianity/Jesus 2. Islam/Muhammad Both are psychological idols which the respective empires erect to amass "power" which is governance over human consciousness and manipulating it to perform the will of that respective empire. That's why all religions are actually run by sick men, and have nothing to do with "God", because that is in the sun. In the fictional Greek mythology of Jesus, he told the Jews "I am the light of the world."That's not symbolic; that's the physical sun. Now you know why he also said "If you have seen me, you've seen the father." and "The father is in me, I in you." etc. Look at John 14:20 - "At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you." So yes, I do perceive these religions as all blatantly sadistic and malevolent. But the followers of them are empowering the lie-based empires upon which the current civilization is based; all sick lies. Now in this context; understand that Islam absolutely is using non-military jihad to "prove" their religion is right by: 1. Implementing Shariah: i. You can not criticize Islam ii. You can not criticize Qur'an iii. You can not criticize Muhammad ...which is exactly what M-103 is intending to do by labeling people as "Islamophobes" for rightfully criticizing Islam for being based on lies, just as Roman Catholicism is. And to people like eyeball above, such are the minds who follow the ignorance of the masses and stands firm in their own ignorance, proudly. I salute you/them.

This actually parallels what the (what I will call) globalists are using Islam for; creating destabilization using the instrument of Islam. Indeed, when Islam has served its purpose, Islam will be promptly removed just as a dog scratches fleas from its skin. You are correct; when JT is no longer useful/needed, he will be discarded. The only reason Barack Obama is still on the world stage is because he is probably Islam's greatest political asset; it almost seems to me that BO was/is being prepped for the role of "Mahdi", but that part is speculation.

I should clarify this; I don't mean to suggest a "financial" ownership, but I wouldn't hesitate to suggest that the CBC is capitulating to pro-Islamic sentiments due to the various handlers of the content. For example, observe and juxtapose these two articles: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-liberal-slide-1.4328327 https://ca.yahoo.com/news/syrian-refugee-uses-wish-thank-102507668.html In the latter, it is (obviously) a response to the former wherein the CBC is using all means necessary to "prop up" Trudeau in the midst of his declining popularity. Observe carefully the words used by the woman: "When I first ... came to Canada here, I was asking, 'Who's helping us? Who's this man, who make this (sic) happen? Who saved my life? Who bring (sic) my life back?' Everyone told me, Justin Trudeau," she said. "He give me a better life and new future." This is a typical sob story public stunt to generate a lift of the public appeal of Justin Trudeau. How is this relevant? Well, Justin Trudeau was scouted by what I will call "political Islam"; his rise to PM is/was calculated and coordinated. Observe his retreat location: private island of Aga Khan: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/aga-khan-apos-birthday-christmas-214853744.html "I am proud to call His Highness both a friend and a mentor," Trudeau said in his birthday wishes. "Canada and the world are stronger and richer because of his commitment to diversity and inclusion, and to finding common ground." Now consider the rise of Muslim-based immigration. In effect, Justin Trudeau is a "political jihadist" who is (either knowingly or unknowingly) capitulating to Islam's goal of dispersing Muslims into Western nations for the eventual dissemination of Western democracy. He is thus an asset to his handlers and is treated as such. That is why you will have articles, such as the second listed in this post, making all attempts to protect his image; indeed, he is an asset, and nothing more. Now understand the connection to Huma Abedin/Clinton who wished to increase similar immigration tactics in the U.S.; thwarted by Trump. Now observe the CBC's anti-Trump rhetoric and constant bashing of Trump foreign and domestic policies. Understand how the U.N. is trying to centralize immigration for the entire world. Observe former U.S. President Barack Obama's capitulation to the Iran Nuclear Deal; allowing the wholesale of drugs etc. This is all connected. On Barack Obama: http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/13/top-nuclear-official-suggests-obama-admin-wasnt-totally-straightforward-on-uranium-one-deal/ Observe Trump's "hint" at who Barack Obama truly is (a political jihadist): Yes the pieces are scattered everywhere, but the big picture is very clear once you find the seed of it all: Islamic expansionism, and the use of non-military jihad (as outlined in the OP) which involves political "inserts". It is as such I deem Justin Trudeau a very psychologically weak individual. By the way, one more article to take a look at: http://www.newindianexpress.com/pti-news/2017/dec/19/sikhs-in-pakistans-kp-province-allege-being-forced-to-convert-1731356.html Let these pieces sink in, and if you're living in Left-Land; where you are so far left, there is literally nothing left, go play with blocks or something.

This is one of the ways Islam collects Jizya from non-Muslims; it's a doctrine of Islam in the Qur'an.

It is not a conspiracy; they openly admit to doing it. The effort is global, but they don't hide it; the operations themselves on "how" they are doing it is kept hidden from the public eye, but it is by no means a conspiracy. M-103 is *quite obviously* the opening conduit through which to silence criticisms of Islam/Qur'an/Muhammad. Iqra Khalid (who tabled the motion) has ties to the Muslim Students' Association, which has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, if one cared to spend about 12 seconds to research. Freedom of speech, expression, assembly, and equality are essential for a democracy. These qualities are barriers for the Sharia; as such, we witness the undermining of them all over the West.

These are the websites you refused to check touting "virus"? What exactly is a hate website? Is it a website that opposes your own personal view? No, it's always. If your mind gravitates toward attacking an individual, there is no intelligent discussion to be had. I gave examples of formerly "Christian" nations who fell to Islam via the Sharia. If you insist on only "Western" ones, whatever "Western" means to you, look at Spain. They spent seven centuries combating this problem. Well at least this is better than most liberals; they wouldn't admit it. I don't want to convince anyone of anything. I could not care less what other people believe; actually, I oppose the imposition of beliefs, which is why I have alluded to the rise of political Islam who are giving American students homework assignments to children to explain to their parents why they are converting to Islam. Again, here is the "almost proof": http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/school-father-islam-conversion-essay-daughter-explain-angry-sunderland-kepier-a8048086.html "Agreed-upon" facts are not facts. If you ask a Muslim (approaching 2 billion people), it is a fact that the Qur'an is the perfect word of God and Muhammad is the final prophet. This is a fact for them, and agreed on, but it is also false. If you ask a Christian, Jesus was a physical man who died for the sins of mankind. This is a fact for them, and agreed on, but it is also false. Take a look at Sweden, where Muslim rape gangs are targeting non-Muslim women. It is sanctioned in the Qur'an. While you are at it, take a look at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal "Almost proof" is an interesting one.

He won't be; this sort of systemic shut-down of freedom of speech (regarding Islam) is rampant all over the world, and people like Michael Hardner are forum plants to draw attention away from it.

Don't generalize; it depends on the calculation. There is no such things as orders of magnitude when there is a rich history demonstrating discernible patterns stretching back 1400 years. Accordingly, when Sharia reaches a certain point in any non-Muslim society, the bottom falls out and a systematic process follows. I recommend you read Sharia law; not the public access version, either. I would never join the CIA; these three-letter institutions are presently cesspools of corruption and blackmail. But let me guess, it's your job to keep people attached to the mainstream narrative and attack those who challenge it. Well, you've done a good job demonstrating that thus far. You're very obvious.

Well, when you have a document stating there are organizations involved with the process, and those organizations are named, they exist, and have ties to terrorist organizations (or are them) then yes, it does make it true. I'm not part of a group, neither am I anti-Muslim. I don't accept the Qur'an, I accept that others not only accept it, but live by the word of it. This is obvious, because they claim it is the perfect word of God. I see right through you, and it seems the majority of others do as well.

Page 4: “Enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and a stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims’ causes domestically and globally, and which works to expand the observant Muslim base, aims at unifying and directing Muslims’ efforts, presents Islam as a civilization alternative, and supports the global Islamic State wherever it is.” Page 5: “…the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain “the keys” and the tools of this process in carry out [sic] this grand mission as a ‘Civilization Jihadist’ responsibility.” Page 7: “The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…” “[W]e must possess a mastery of the art of ‘coalitions’, the art of ‘absorption’ and the principles of ‘cooperation.’” Page 18: “A list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends” – This is where the Muslim Brotherhood listed its front groups in the U.S.. Note that prominent organizations like CAIR, ISNA, ICNA and others are named here. From: https://clarionproject.org/muslim_brotherhood_explanatory_memorandum/ And this document was used in a legal proceeding. Did I make this up? Regarding foresight; if you engage in theory of mind, understand the patterns of conduct by prominent world leaders, and juxtapose it with their public interactions/engagements, you can most definitely project 15 years into the future, including all possible outcomes. Have you ever played chess? It's like that. You can calculate moves, you know?

It's not a conspiracy; the Qur'an outlines exactly what the goal is; to spread Islam across the entire world. They have been doing it for the past 1400 years, and over 270 000 000 people are dead as a result. Not even Muslims hide this fact. If you are looking for "facts", especially regarding motive for such widespread collusion, I'd start with the Qur'an. Then read the Sunnah/Hadith for political doctrines. Now you know why 9/11 happened; to begin the migrant crisis a.k.a. immigration-based jihad. Now you know why the U.N. wants to centralize immigration etc. Facts do not lose their veracity on account of individuals (such as yourself) either being too short-sighted and/or incapable of digesting geopolitics. Finally, regarding your reference to "fear", read of the man who used it as a sole political means: https://www.amazon.ca/Life-Muhammad-I-Ishaq/dp/0196360331/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1513435828&sr=1-1&keywords=life+of+muhammad

You're some piece of work; who are you to police what people express? Judging your post history, you have an obnoxiously supremacist attitude about you, and many people seem to see through it.

I concur, and always point to a very revealing quote from Mark Twain: "That is a simple rule, and easy to remember. When I, a thoughtful and unblessed Presbyterian, examine the Koran, I know that beyond any question every Mohammedan is insane; not in all things, but in religious matters. " -Twain Notice his use of the term "Mohammedan" rather than Muslim. It is most fitting to describe Muslims as Mohammedans; the entire premise of their religion is to adapt their own behavior to that of Muhammad by imitating his "example" as outlined by the sunnah. As such, they are imitators of a conceptual image of a man, thus idolators, thereby breaking one of the Ten Commandments. Additionally, in order to join Islam, one must perform the shahada, which is a testimony/witness statement that there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his final prophet. As such, all behaviors resulting from such a declaration (including jihad) finds its roots on this witness statement. This violates yet another commandment; bearing witness against thy neighbor, as the Qur'an is a concoction of Syro-Aramaic Christian liturgical texts; the sources of which were burned by Uthman.