9-18-1

...by the authors directly underneath your post. I can't believe how stupid people are. Thomas Quiggin, MA, CD Thomas is a court-qualified expert on terrorism (criminal court and federal court) and has had his expertise on the “the reliability of intelligence as evidence” recognized by the Federal Court of Canada. He has also testified as a court expert to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. He was a Senior Fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Thomas has 25 plus years of practical intelligence experience in a variety of positions. These include the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (NSIS/INSET); the Bank of Canada; the Canadian Armed Forces; the United Nations Protection Force in Yugoslavia; Citizenship and Immigration Canada (War Crimes); the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague, and the Privy Council Office of Canada. He was also a qualified arms control inspector for the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty and the Vienna Document. He has also testified to a Senate Committee on intelligence matters (The Kelly Commission, 1998); the Air India Inquiry (2007) as well as providing testimony to the Special Senate Committee on Anti-terrorism (2010) and to the House of Commons on 25 March and 28 May 2015. Thomas holds a Master’s Degree in International Relations and is a certified knowledge management practitioner. He has also provided three training sessions to the Canadian Department of Justice as part of the special advocates program with the focus being on intelligence and evidence. Thomas also has been a guest lecturer at the Canadian Police College with the lectures on terrorism and intelligence. He has spoken at various conferences in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Australia on related matters. Thomas has authored many publications on security and terrorism matters in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, USA, Canada, and Singapore. He has previously published a book on national security titled Seeing the Invisible: National Security Intelligence in an Uncertain Age, (2007, World Scientific).

Have you read the treatise provided? You're not going to understand the motives of M-103 without reading the treatise unless you already discovered it on your own as I have.

1. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Thomas Quiggin, MA, CD Thomas is a court-qualified expert on terrorism (criminal court and federal court) and has had his expertise on the “the reliability of intelligence as evidence” recognized by the Federal Court of Canada. He has also testified as a court expert to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. He was a Senior Fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Thomas has 25 plus years of practical intelligence experience in a variety of positions. These include the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (NSIS/INSET); the Bank of Canada; the Canadian Armed Forces; the United Nations Protection Force in Yugoslavia; Citizenship and Immigration Canada (War Crimes); the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague, and the Privy Council Office of Canada. He was also a qualified arms control inspector for the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty and the Vienna Document. He has also testified to a Senate Committee on intelligence matters (The Kelly Commission, 1998); the Air India Inquiry (2007) as well as providing testimony to the Special Senate Committee on Anti-terrorism (2010) and to the House of Commons on 25 March and 28 May 2015. Thomas holds a Master’s Degree in International Relations and is a certified knowledge management practitioner. He has also provided three training sessions to the Canadian Department of Justice as part of the special advocates program with the focus being on intelligence and evidence. Thomas also has been a guest lecturer at the Canadian Police College with the lectures on terrorism and intelligence. He has spoken at various conferences in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Australia on related matters. Thomas has authored many publications on security and terrorism matters in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, USA, Canada, and Singapore. He has previously published a book on national security titled Seeing the Invisible: National Security Intelligence in an Uncertain Age, (2007, World Scientific). Tahir Gora Tahir is a Director General and founder of Canadian Thinkers’ Forum (CTF), a Think Tank focusing on complexities of diversity in Canada. He is recipient of the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Medal for his services. He contributes regularly to various well-known Canadian newspapers and web-based forums including The Huffington Post. He is a strong proponent of freedom of speech and has developed various initiatives to bring about the much-needed changes in the representational and communal aspects of Canadian Muslim Community. Tahir is a prominent writer, novelist, poet, journalist, editor, translator, publisher and TV Host (for South Asian TV Channels) with over 30 years of experience in the industry. He is recognized as a bold social activist who has initiated many interfaith and pluralistic streams to bring Muslim community of Canada together to support progressive ideas and actions. He is an author of two novels, three collections of short stories and three collections of poems in the Urdu and Punjabi languages. One novel and a collection of poems have been translated and published in Russian and Uzbek languages. Tahir is also a founder of the online multicultural TAG TV. Some of his shows in Urdu-Hindi languages have received millions of views in South East Asia. Saied Shoaaib Saied is a writer and researcher who has specialized in Islamic movements. Originally from Egypt, he has previously served as the editor/manager of the Alyoum 7 news website (www.youm7.com). Saied has also been the manager of “United Journalists” which is a human rights organization that works in the training and protection of the rights of journalists. He also been the editor-in-chief of the Sada Albalad news website, the Editor/Advisor of the Vetogate news website and the Editor/Advisor of the Albasaba News website. Saied has also taught electronic journalism at the Canadian University of Egypt. His work in Egypt has earned him fatwa death threat in Egypt and online death threats in Canada. Saied has written several books, which include: “Lovers of Death”: Islamist extremism in our Canadian mosques, schools, and libraries (2016) co-authored with Thomas Quiggin about the sources of Islamic terrorism in Canada, and How to be a successful journalist and how to profit from the electronic media, (2014) Dar Awrak; The Demise of the State of the Muslim Brotherhood, (2013) Dar Awrak; Toz in Egypt: The Sins of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, (2010) Sesafa. Where does Egypt Go? (2001) State rigging - confessions of the first police officer of election fraud (2000) in conjunction with Mahmood Kotry, published by the Centre for the Future; Saied also wrote a play titled Do not be Satisfied, 1990. Jonathon Cotler Raised mainly in Canada, Jonathon has travelled extensively in the Middle East. His B.A. was from McGill University in Montreal and his law degree is from the New York Law School. Rick Gill, CD Rick is a 38-year veteran of the Canadian Armed Forces, 32 years of which were served in military intelligence as an intelligence analyst, intelligence plans staff officer, instructor, training developer, and analytic methodologist. He has over ten years’ experience as an intelligence analytic instructor and training developer. Rick has served in numerous strategic, operational, and tactical environments, both domestically and abroad, including deployments to Bosnia-Hercegovina, Kosovo and Afghanistan. Since retiring from the Canadian Armed Forces in 2012, Rick has worked in both the public and private sectors, focusing on the development and delivery of tools, training, and education for intelligence analysts. 2. The intention of M-103 is not to "outlaw" anything. It is to legitimize the use of a term in order to shut down criticisms of Islam, which is a real law in Sharia. ________________________ With your unrelenting and systemic attempts to completely dismiss discussions on this matter using sweeping statements, you are using the exact same tactics outlined in this treatise which is presently threatening Canada: 1. You attempt to dismiss *all* references/resources without having read them 2. You consistently employ ad hominem 3. You never once contributed to a single discussion in any meaningful way whatsoever 4. Your ignorance regarding the socio-political fabric of Islam is obvious (and destructive) 5. Your attempts to shut down discussion is reminiscent of fascist and totalitarian behavior The attitude you adopt is the very same attitude adopted by pro-Sharia Islamists who are hellbent on destroying open discussion. Just be honest with us all, are you a covert social jihadist?

I'm sorry I don't know anything about "Zionism" - and neither does the OP have anything to do with Zionism. The OP is about Islam as a religio-political institution. Why do you insist on trying to make everything about race? Stop trying to play the race card where it doesn't apply, and stop trying to bring in institutions such as "Zionism" which has nothing to do with the topic. You're rather pathetic for doing so - enough with the race already.

I'm sorry I don't know what a "Jewish institution" is. Islam is a religio-political ideology and has nothing to do with race, despite your attempts to make it one. Are you still this confused about the difference between race and ideology?

Did you read the attached document? Did you read the attached document? Did you read the attached document? M-103 does outlaw Islamic blasphemy. It's in the document, if you cared to read. Muslim_Brotherhood_in_Canada.pdf

You want sketch? Look at these quote as contained within the attached document: “It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.” Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood. “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it.” Abul A’la Maududi, founder of Jamaat-e-Islami. “Conquest through dawah, that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through dawah.” Yusuf Qaradawi, International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS). “Therefore, prepare for jihad and be the lovers of death. Life itself shall come searching after you. You should yearn for an honourable death and you will gain perfect happiness. May Allah grant myself and yours the honour of martyrdom in His way!” Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood as quoted by the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) Youth Wing of Canada. “Here, we follow the teachings of the Muslim Brotherhood.” Dr. El-Tantawi Attia, Executive Director, Dundas Street Mosque, Muslim Association of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. “Islam is not incompatible with free and open Western secular democracies.” “Much of the philosophy and vision of the Muslim Association of Canada derives from the heritage of the Muslim Brotherhood. Our commitment to the model of individual self-development expressed in communal organization is based largely on the vision of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hassan Al- Banna… We believe that the efforts of Al-Banna and subsequent generations of the Muslim Brotherhood remain the truest reflection of Islamic practice in the modern era.” The Muslim Association of Canada (MAC) web site. “We do not work for anything else and anybody else but the establishment of Allah’s government.” Maulana Asad Jafri, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. And: The current Canadian government is accommodating Islamist enablers at a time when the violence emanating from these ideologies is increasing. As the spread of the Islamist ideology and violence accelerates, the respective positions of the Canadian and American governments are evolving. The previous Administration of President Obama (2009 to 2017) allowed Muslim Brotherhood leadership figures into the White House and other corridors of influence such as the State Department. Under the influence of Valerie Jarrett, the Obama Administration was also accommodating to the demands of the Iranian regime. At roughly the same time, from 2006 to 2015, Prime Minister Harper of Canada took a relatively hard-line stance against the Islamists resident in Canada and went so far as to remove the Iranian Ambassador and his staff from Canada in 2012. Several charities in Canada with Islamist connections had their charitable status revoked for funding terrorism (See Chapter 15 on IRFAN and the ISNA Development Fund etc.). Now the roles have reversed. The Administration of President Trump is taking a harder line against the Islamists and the Iranians. By contrast, Prime Minister Trudeau has shown himself to be repeatedly submissive to the Islamist cause. While difficult to categorize, Western leaders appear to be split into to “globalists” who favour immigration without integration and “sovereigntists” who favour national priorities over globalist agendas. Trudeau regularly appears in the globalist anti-border camp, while Trump is moving in a nationalist pro-border direction. Yes, this is real folks. Canada is under attack, to use some Trump lingo, "big league".

This is a delusion in your own mind. I make a distinction between political Islam and religious Islam, because they are not the same and can't be treated the same. Many Muslims are not even aware of the political side, and some (many) even stand opposed to it such as Tarek Fatah. I treat things objectively and don't let liberal brain rot infect my mind to an extent wherein I treat the criticism of a political institution as "racism". You are likely suffering your own cognitive dissonance owing to your rather obvious ignorance regarding Islam as a political institution. Go read my new thread and the attached document contained therein - until then, I suggest you shut up and stop making yourself look stupid.

In this thread I will simply draw attention to the MP who tabled motion M-103 and her affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood. First, excerpts from: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9770/muslim-brotherhood-front-organizations Cruz (R-TX) earlier had a bill in the Senate which would not only ban the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. but also three of its front groups: Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR) USA, Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT). These American-based front groups have corresponding chapters or organizations in Canada as well. In Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police investigation (Project Sapphire) into the International Relief Fund for the Afflicted and Needy (IRFAN) continues. IRFAN was one of four Muslim Brotherhood front groups identified during testimony to the Canadian Senate in 2015. The others were Islamic Relief Canada, the Muslim Association of Canada and the National Council of Canadian Muslims, formerly known as CAIR CAN. CAIR CAN, according to the U.S. State Department and a multiplicity of other sources, is the Canadian chapter of CAIR USA. Another group, the Muslim Student Association (MSA) of the United States and Canada was established in January 1963 by members of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign campus. Its creation was the result of Saudi-backed efforts to create a network of international Islamic organizations in order to spread its Wahhabist ideology. It was essentially "an arm of the Saudi-funded, Muslim Brotherhood-controlled Muslim World League." _____ **Iqra Khalid, who tabled motion M-103 (Sharia anti-blasphemy law), is the former president of the Muslim Student Association.** _____ Excerpt from: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/radical-muslim-immigrant-now-canadian-parliament-pushing-anti-islamophobia-law/ Interestingly enough, despite noting her work as President of a Pakistani student club, her official Liberal Party website makes no mention of her work as President of the York University Muslim Student’s Association. And excerpts from: http://canadafirst.nfshost.com/?p=765 The Muslim Student Association at York University handed out a book at Islam Awareness Week with the title “Women in Islam & Refutation of some Common Misconceptions.” The chapter on WIFE DISCIPLINING (page 99 of the online version) makes the following observation: Submissive or subdued women. These women may even enjoy being beaten at times as a sign of love and concern. Iqra Khalid is/was a member of CAMP – Council for the Advancement of Muslim Professionals. She was the Communications Coordinator under (then) President and CEO Najamuddin Mohammed. CAMP has multiple ties to the North American Muslim Brotherhood. _____ There are numerous articles one can search to solidify the affiliations of the parties mentioned above. This is an example of how political Islam (in contrast to the religion of Islam) infiltrates Western democracies and introduces pro-Sharia motions/legislation: 1. You can not criticize Qur'an 2. You can not criticize Muhammad 3. You can not criticize Islam Individuals who do so are now at the mercy of the newly empowered pro-Sharia proponents to merely point their finger and say a single word "Islamophobe" to shut down the conversation. This is a form of social jihad warfare and is being employed not only in Canada but every country with high intake of Muslim migrants. This, in combination with Canada's dramatic influx of immigration, should at the very least be something to remain focused on as Canada continues to suffer attacks based on political Islamic doctrines designed to transform democracies into Sharia states over many decades/generations. Finally, if anyone is interested in understanding further the true nature of the threat to Canada posed by the Muslim Brotherhood, a treatise was recently released on amazon.ca Dec. 05 2017 (free with kindleunlimited) found here: https://www.amazon.ca/SUBMISSION-Danger-Political-Warning-America-ebook/dp/B0785P3W7L/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1514870749&sr=8-1&keywords=muslim+brotherhood+canada I have also attached a PDF of the full document here. Excerpts: Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami are paving their way to introduce Sharia law here in Canada. Federal parliamentary motion number 103 (also known as M-103) on Islamophobia is part of this activity. It seems that Islamist groups in Canada are trying their best to prove that Islamophobia is a big issue here. Some Muslim Canadian MPs are working hard in our federal parliament on behalf of the Islamist cause. M-103 is unnecessary. If there would have been islamophobia, Canadians would have not elected 11 members of the Muslim faith to the Canadian Parliament (Ten Liberal and one Conservative). Progressive Muslims find it difficult to raise questions about this loose motion. It’s against the wind of populism. Since the Liberal Government passed M-103, opponents to modernist Muslims are calling them traitors and infidels. But modernist Muslims are the voice of the voiceless. It is also they who suffer at the hands of Islamists. Canadians of diverse religious backgrounds are also concerned about mixing religion with politics. Unfortunately, most politicians are playing with this motion for their short term political gain, but they are unable to understand the magnitude of damage they are causing to our own beloved Canada. They are unable to understand the damage to Muslims in Canada. This motion has put Muslims' safety and security at risk. Now, Muslims in Canada are selected targets of backlash and retaliation. Please observe the types of responses generated in this thread, as I would be interested to see who (and how) individuals try to shut down the discussion of such topics, as there is no doubt that the MB will have an online presence as well. Please stay on topic as all trolling will be reported - this discussion is about M-103, and nothing else. Muslim_Brotherhood_in_Canada.pdf

Hahahahahahaha Oh dear, are you one of these liberal morons who doesn't know what racism is? That explains a lot. Let me help you out. "ism" = single out "race" = unique genetic trait(s) which are distinguishable from others A religion, such as Islam, is not a race. Individuals from any race can join Islam. See this is why Liberals are destroying Canada; they don't even know what racism is anymore. If you want to know racism, read the Qur'an and observe the anti-Semitism in there. What the hell is the matter with you people? Please go educate yourself before accusing people of "racism" while defending a political/religious ideology which actually IS racist. Unbelievable. EDIT for clarification on the stupidity that eyeball has just demonstrated, observe the following two videos: The former is Ben Affleck calling criticism of Islam as "racist". The latter is a LIBERAL channel clarifying that criticisms of religion has nothing to do with race.

It doesn't matter if rules are "correct" - one must agree to them to even post/engage in the first place. If one agrees to rules of engagement, then breaks them, one is liable to be held accountable for doing such. In this case, MH consistently breaks them all over the place, so I reported him after he kept doing it (on purpose). If he didn't break them, and actually engaged in discussion rather than rhetoric, he can address the topic as is the intention of these forums in the first place.

Freedom of speech does not mean indiscriminately violate the forum rules: Be Polite and Respect Others Mapleleafweb operates these forums in the hopes that they will promote intelligent, honest and responsible discussion. We encourage you to speak your mind on relevant issues in a thoughtful way. Please respect others using this board and treat them with respect and dignity. No Trolling/Flaming Do not post inflammatory remarks just to annoy people. If you are not bringing anything new to the argument, then do not say anything at all. Some messages are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value. An example would be a person who persistently creates conflict without contributing anything useful. In newsgroup circles, such a person is known as a "troll". We define "trolling" as a message that serves no constructive purpose and is likely to cause offence or arguments. We define "annoying" as any message that results in a complaint from a registered user -- we will then decide whether to take action. No Personal Attacks Please respect others using this board by refraining from personal attacks. There is a huge difference between disagreeing with a thought or idea and attacking an individual. We encourage lively debate and intelligent critiques of others viewpoints, not tirades against another poster. 1. You have brought nothing new to the argument except for rhetoric and defamation. Not a single reference, source, nothing. 2. You persistently create conflict and derailment instead of just going away and ignoring the topic entirely. 3. You have done nothing but employ ad hominem. Now why don't you stop breaking the forum rules and stop posting here without some substance? And most importantly, stop trying to suggest what other people should think. People can think for themselves. Thanks.

There are rules governing conduct on forums; he admitted to intentionally trying to derail from the main topic, which is trolling, which is what I reported him for. If he actually contributed to the topic, rather than derailing, I would not have reported anything.

You were just called out for these kinds of responses, and you continue to roast yourself. Now it appears to me you are intentionally trying to derail the thread which is trolling, and you are reported as such.

Most competent people would counter with something with actual body rather than dismissing it as a "steaming pile of shit". If you disagree with any of the content, state why with your sources and relevant research. I've been researching the foundations of Islam, foundations of the Qur'an, foundations of Sharia, have linked to several articles, several books, and even a document from the Muslim Brotherhood claiming that their sole purpose is to destroy the West from within. I've outlined the various non-military form of jihad, how they are implemented, and given many examples of how this is occurring all over the West. I've referenced specific injunctions which call on Muslims to engage in jihad. In Britain alone, for example, there are over 80 Sharia courts already established and functioning. If the crux of your argument is "steaming pile of shit" which I will take the liberty of translating into "I don't have a clue about Islam, Muhammad, Sharia, and this all sounds conspiracy-like, and I don't want to believe it is true, therefor the OP is lying" then you are simply ignorant. I would press any single individual on this forum to bring forward their contentions, backed by substance, and we can discuss from there. Otherwise, discrediting something on the basis of your own personal ignorance is not only dishonest, but rather dangerous should it turn out that the assertions I have made are indeed accurate (which I am more than willing to defend if someone would simply bring forward an honest contention that does not involve bigotry or rhetoric).

Another great post; freedom of speech is absolutely essential and it is uplifting to see some Canadians still standing for it. What is equally uplifting is witnessing Canadians who can think for themselves and call out such individuals for employing rhetoric rather than actual discussion. I say let these people continue to out themselves - it is enjoyable to witness people roast themselves. Don't let these kinds of people undermine your fundamental right to express yourself. In the meantime, from wikipedia: Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argumentative strategy whereby an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. Apply to: Now let's try to stay on topic from here; thread has become derailed.

Let the record show that here is an individual who recognizes the importance of open discussion. These are the kinds of people who can keep democracies safe. Michael Hardner, you could learn much from this, though it is not difficult to see through you. I know who you are and what you are trying to do, but I will keep it to myself.

1. This response has absolutely no substance. 2. Ad hominem demonstrates your inability to discuss the subject matter directly. Moreover, who are you to speak on behalf of others? I grant people the ability to think for themselves, rather than pretending to know (or suggest to naive readers) what they think. Don't insult people like that, it is anti-democratic and anti-western. 3. I have not lied about a single thing, and neither have you produced a single advance in the discussion that does not involve trying to discredit me with accusations, much like a prosecutor discredits a witness in order to nullify their testimony. It's very deceptive and dishonest. Deal with the subject matter itself, if you are capable. Further, I am in no position, neither am I inclined to ban religion. To the rest: notice how this individual is attempting to shut down the conversation by suggesting my opinions aren't valuable, while simultaneously accusing me of being anti-democratic. The very tactics I point out as threatening democracy (shutting down criticisms of political Islam) are being employed by this individual. It almost makes you wonder, who is really behind that keyboard?

As I explained in the post above, Islam contains a significant political component which is not present in Christianity. These political components are outlined in the original post on this thread. Christianity does not employ the use of social, political, economic, immigration-based etc. forms of warfare with there being a central goal of subduing the entire planet to Islam. You keep asking why single out a different religion. While all religions are equally false, they are not equally false in the same ways. Islam contains political elements which overtly subjugate all non-Muslims by implementing the Sharia: 1. You can not criticize Qur'an 2. You can not criticize Muhammad 3. You can not criticize Islam Motion M-103 employs social jihad wherein it empowers Muslim apologists to discredit all discussions (however legitimate) by calling people "Islamophoes" and/or bigots. This is an overt attack of freedom of speech in compliance with Sharia. There is absolutely no such thing that compares in any other monotheistic religion; Islam is inherently aggressive with regards to spreading via all means possible - militarily being the least employed/effective way. I don't want to ban religion; but we need to understand that Islam is not *only* a religion. Religion applies to people who believe in it. In Islam, over 60% of the Qur'an is dedicated to non-Muslims (unbelievers) and how to systematically subjugate them. This is not religion; this is political and it affects all people who are not Muslims. Accordingly, it is rather depressing to see individuals such as yourself completely unaware and feeling you are taking a moral high ground by protecting the institution of religion. Unfortunately, this is the same liberal mindset that is destroying Canada and the rest of the West. Regarding "dictatorial" instinct, I suggest you read the life of Muhammad to truly understand what a dictator is. Hitler was a child compared to Muhammad, with Muhammad's teachings now responsible for the death of over 270 000 000 non-Muslims as a result of military jihad "in the cause of Allah". For you to compare me to such for merely attempting to raise awareness of the political (not religious) aspects of Islam suggests to me that you are rather ignorant in this matter. Freedom of speech, expression, inquiry, assembly, and equality should be protected at all costs in any democratic society. In Islam under Sharia, several forms of expression are banned (including art, music, theater), freedom of speech is non-existent, women are degraded etc. Rather than "banning religion", I would legislate something resembling a hostile foreign agencies act wherein any hostile foreign agency (including political Islam) which attempts to undermine the pillars of democracy will be treated as exactly what they are - hostile entities. Trudeau's and the current house's capitulation to political Islam (mass immigration, motion M-103, paying Muslims tax-payer dollars via Islamic jizya, calling people Islamophobes etc.) are all aiding and abetting a hostile foreign entity. So rather than you claiming I am "dictatorial", I would actually be trying to protect people's freedoms for their children and children's children from such entities as political Islam. If they want to worship religiously, that's fine, but when political elements of their religion tamper with democracy itself (as is presently the case), a stance should be taken because it is the right thing to do.

You may not suspect this, but unfortunately all monotheistic religions dealing with the God of Abraham are false. Even prior to Islam; upon Constantine declaring Jesus was a historical man who died on the cross for the sins of the world, many persecutions of "infidels" and "unbelievers" occurred which resulted in them either accepting J. C. as Lord (fall into the RC Empire) or having their heads removed. The Bible (both OT and NT) has a strictly astrological basis; Abram (Abraham) and Sarai are the Sun and Moon, Moses is the Sun, Jesus is the Sun etc. The astrological knowledge is encoded in story form for the purpose of transmitting the cycles of the cosmos in story form that they may be absorbed much easier than a technical approach - it is easier to learn from narrative than it is an otherwise more technical way. Monotheism (whether it is Christianity or Islam) has been systematically brainwashing people for thousands of years. In the case of Islam (and the purpose of this thread) there is a significant political component which employs systemic infiltration/subjugation of all non-Muslims. Here is a document which outlines how Islam employs such tactics to spread Sharia law: https://www.politicalislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/PDF-Downloads/Sharia_Law_for_Non-Muslims.pdf Some books which deconstruct the astrological basis of the OT/NT: https://www.amazon.ca/Astrology-Testament-Lost-Word-Regained/dp/1564599302/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1514827551&sr=8-1&keywords=lost+word+regained https://www.amazon.ca/Who-this-King-Glory-Christos-Messiah/dp/1461190363/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1514827570&sr=1-1&keywords=who+is+this+king+of+glory https://www.amazon.ca/Gospel-Zodiac-Secret-Truth-about/dp/1590200373/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1514827716&sr=1-4-fkmr0&keywords=dill+darlison

Excerpts: Jihad means war against Kafirs to establish Islam’s Sharia law. Koran 2:216 You are commanded to fight although you dislike it. You may hate something that is good for you, and love something that is bad for you. Allah knows and you do not. Koran 4:89 They would have you become Kafirs like them so you will all be the same. Therefore, do not take any of them as friends until they have abandoned their homes to fight for Allah’s cause [jihad]. But if they turn back, find them and kill them wherever they are. Jihad is a communal obligation. When enough people perform it, it is no longer obligatory upon others. The caliph (supreme ruler who is both a king and similar to a pope) makes war on the Jews and Christians. First invite them to Islam, then invite them to pay the jizya (tax on Kafirs). If they reject conversion and the jizya, then attack them. Koran 9:29 Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya] and they are humiliated. ...etc. There is a lot more info in the document regarding the true nature of Jihad which I invite all to read. In a nutshell; jihad is the principle modus operandi of spreading Islam.

If one wants to understand how jihad is employed via civilizational means, here is a good reference: https://www.politicalislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/PDF-Downloads/Sharia_Law_for_Non-Muslims.pdf Excerpt: FOUR KINDS OF JIHAD Jihad can be practiced by the sword, speech, writing or money. The jihad of the sword is the least dangerous to a society. Jihadist groups are not as dangerous to the West as the civilizational jihad of groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood.

Sorry you take offense; insecure people tend to do this. I don't give that power over others; liberals will let these fascist regimes walk all over them because Islam exploits weakness/shame, that's why you have people like Justin Trudeau being fooled into running around the country apologizing and crying about everything; he is not only embarrassing himself, but all of Canada, and people who have their lips on his ass look equally as pathetic.

I had people like you in mind; that must have been immediately obvious to you.

Here in Canada many people are still zzzzz; just see my thread and the responses therein regarding non-military jihad. Still, Canada is in better shape than most Western nations - not owing to anything other than how it all played out logistically. I hope there is enough research now completed on the Qur'an to prompt a reformation of Islam; namely it being recently discovered that the Qur'an has a Christian substrate and it was not divinely revealed. If this happens, and Mohammad Bin Salman is serious about reforming Islam, that will be enough for Western powers to find their balls and stand strong against this totalitarian fascist regime.