9-18-1

He took the shahada in front of a whole congregation of Muslims. When you do that, you become a Muslim. Don't worry, I imagine once the indictment on George Soros drops in the U.S., Trudeau will get exposed. After all, he did vacation at the private island of Aga Khan.

This observation is actually extremely important: the entire premise of being a "good" Muslim is how well one "imitates" Muhammad. Essentially Muslims are told Muhammad said this and that, did this and that, here is his Sunnah, now go and imitate him and die in jihad. This is actually idolatry because Muslims are given a mold of a man to imitate. If one wants to take a theocratic approach, Islam inherently breaks almost every single one of the ten commandments. In order to join Islam, you must perform the shahada (as Justin Trudeau did) which is essentially a testimony: there is no God or deity to worship, there is only Allah, and Muhammad is the final messenger of Allah. In the ten commandments, thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor is meant to protect people from joining such idolatry-based cults. If it is true that the Qur'an is actually a historical document (the books I referenced above demonstrate this) then it necessarily follows that Muhammad made it up as he went. From that, it necessarily follows that Islam is a false religion. However, every single Muslim who ever has and will live has taken the shahada, thus bearing false witness, thus committing a self-incriminating cosmic indictment on themselves. Even in their own Qur'an, when Muhammad flew to the Seven Heavens, the first gate or tribulation is guarded by Moses, who holds the ten commandments. Now every action they perform based on that shahada, including seeing non-Muslims as inferior, taking sex slaves, degrading women, military and non-military jihad etc. are all based on a false premise, therefor "Satanic" if we are to stick to a theocratic approach. From a more reasonable approach, all monotheistic religions are based on lies and made by man. Constantine turned Jesus into a real man (Jesus is the sun surrounded by the twelve Zodiacal signs) who died on the cross for the sins of the world, thus all must bow down to J. C. (Julius Caesar) and the Islamic empire is based on the delusions of a sex-addicted caravan-raiding warlord who recruited people by giving them permission to loot booty and women if they fought to expand the empire, as long as he got 20% of the keep. And this has been going on ever since. The recent purge in Saudi Arabia (thank you Trump) and more recently Turkey were all sex-trafficking rings based on Islamic doctrines. But in the context of the 25920 year recurring cycle, these pagan religions are born in the dark ages (Pisces) and will die as we move further into the age of Aquarius, which we entered Dec. 21 2012. That's why you see all of this corruption getting uprooted in the U.S. with Clinton/Abedin/Obama/Soros. There's probably close to 10 000 sealed indictments by now waiting to get released. But the people here in Canada are still asleep and don't have a clue; Trudeau is by far the most dangerous man in Canada.

I've read more on the Qur'an, Muhammad, and Hadith than probably all users on this board combined. Some books I recommend: https://www.amazon.ca/Hidden-Origins-Islam-Research-History/dp/1591026342/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1515199342&sr=8-1&keywords=hidden+origins+of+islam https://www.amazon.ca/Syro-Aramaic-Reading-Koran-Contribution-Decoding/dp/3899300882/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1515199373&sr=8-1&keywords=syro-aramaic+reading https://www.amazon.ca/Mohammeds-Koran-Muslims-Kill-Islam/dp/0995584907/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1515199402&sr=8-1&keywords=why+muslims+kill+for+islam https://www.amazon.ca/Foundations-Islam-Self-Study-Course/dp/1936659174/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1515199423&sr=8-5&keywords=bill+warner https://www.amazon.ca/Original-Sources-Quran-Clair-Tisdall/dp/1110537778/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1515199463&sr=8-1&keywords=original+sources+of+qur'an https://www.amazon.ca/Life-Muhammad-I-Ishaq/dp/0196360331/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515199523&sr=1-2&keywords=muhammad+ishaq These books will make it all pretty clear. Pay no mind to the ultra-liberal pluralists; they really (and I mean really) have no clue what they are dealing with - their open-arms approach is nothing but self-destructive, but I see at least you are aware.

*clicks name *selects "Ignore User" The only "race" the left is involved in is the race to stupidity. You've lapped the rest of humanity. Enjoy your marathon!

We need to make an important distinction here. Criticizing an institution (be it religious or socio-political) has nothing to do with the adherents of that institution. It is actually the bigots who conflate the two. Criticizing Islam does not necessarily indicate that one is likewise criticizing Muslims as people. It is only individuals who can't tell the difference that insist they are being "insulted". Trying to equate criticizing a socio-political institution with "racism" is bigotry - no matter what mental gymnastics one attempts to employ. Now of course Muslims or Muslim apologists (neo-liberals or "pluralists") may take offense to the criticism, but that is only because they identify themselves with that institution (or apologize for those that do) and feel it is "politically incorrect", or to a more bigoted extent, "racist". This is their own complex; not the one criticizing the institution. You see this in the left all over the place nowadays, and indeed on this very thread. Islam is not a race, and there is a distinction between a religious and/or socio-political institution as an ideological construct in and of itself, and adherents of them.

It's a pro-Sharia shill, just like ?Impact and eyeball. Just ignore them, as hard as it is to do. Just let them expose themselves.

The fruits of civilization-based jihad and Sharia anti-blasphemy M-103 (Iqra Khalid) all wrapped in one video, with the George Soros connection.

I'm sorry, I must have stumbled into the neo-liberal part of the internet where incompetent people use sweeping statements like "moronic hyperbole", "logical fallacy" and "stupid bullshit" whenever they encounter something beyond their comprehension. What could have been a great opportunity for you to set the example of providing "dialogoe" as to why any one of your sweeping statements are applicable, you wasted it on walking in the room, throwing a brief neo-liberal episode, and thinking you made a point. You did make a point; you're an idiot.

Apologies; I should have assumed it was all beyond your grasp. There are some blocks in the corner for you to play with.

No matter how much you try... ...Islam is not a race. But watching you double-down on your own stupidity has become entertaining for me. More please! I could explain it all, but not to someone who thinks Islam is a race. When you get that bit straightened out, maybe then. Regarding the left, the problem starts with some very special people such as yourself who conflate socio-political ideologies with race. That might be a starting point as to how dangerously stupid the left is. The solution begins with finding a mirror. That's all you need to know for now, and probably all you can handle for now. Wouldn't want to overburden you, as you seem to need all the guidance you can get. Do you need a helmet?

Radically educated on the subject; thanks for the compliment!

...still have no idea what you are referencing. Three strikes and you're out.

Again, you picked a good name because I have no idea what you are talking about.

Sharia Law: 1. You can not criticize the Qur'an 2. You can not criticize Muhammad 3. You can not criticize Islam When Charlie Hebdo happened, the artists were killed as per Sharia. "Islamophobia" is a term invented by the Muslim Brotherhood to be used as a means to shut down all criticisms of the above. By your treatment of the term as a legitimate term you are effectively pro-Sharia, whether you realize it or not. Great idea on the book club. Here are my recommendations: Currently I am reading: https://www.amazon.ca/Mohammeds-Koran-Muslims-Kill-Islam/dp/0995584907/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1515026739&sr=8-1&keywords=why+muslims+kill I own: https://www.amazon.ca/Syro-Aramaic-Reading-Koran-Contribution-Decoding/dp/3899300882/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027208&sr=1-1&keywords=syro-aramaic+reading https://www.amazon.ca/Challenge-Islam-Reformation-Gunter-Luling/dp/8120819527/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027217&sr=1-1&keywords=gunter+luling https://www.amazon.ca/Hagarism-Making-Islamic-Patricia-Crone/dp/0521211336/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027369&sr=1-1&keywords=hagarism https://www.amazon.ca/Hidden-Origins-Islam-Research-History/dp/1591026342/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515026931&sr=1-3&keywords=origins+of+islam https://www.amazon.ca/Original-Sources-Quran-Clair-Tisdall/dp/1110537778/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515026964&sr=1-1&keywords=original+sources+of+qur'an https://www.amazon.ca/Life-Muhammad-I-Ishaq/dp/0196360331/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027181&sr=1-1&keywords=life+of+muhammad https://www.amazon.ca/Foreign-Vocabulary-Quran-Arthur-Jeffery/dp/1593337515/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027299&sr=1-1&keywords=foreign+vocabulary+of+the+qur'an https://www.amazon.ca/Sharia-Law-Non-Muslims-Bill-Warner/dp/0979579481/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515026987&sr=1-1&keywords=sharia+warner https://www.amazon.ca/Hadith-Traditions-Mohammed-Bill-Warner/dp/1936659018/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027080&sr=1-1&keywords=bill+warner https://www.amazon.ca/Hour-Koran-Taste-Islam-Book-ebook/dp/B00DYBRLDG/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027097&sr=1-2&keywords=bill+warner https://www.amazon.ca/Life-Mohammed-Sira-Bill-Warner/dp/1936659069/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027107&sr=1-4&keywords=bill+warner https://www.amazon.ca/Islamic-Doctrine-Women-Bill-Warner/dp/097957949X/ref=sr_1_7?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027116&sr=1-7&keywords=bill+warner https://www.amazon.ca/Doctrine-Slavery-Islamic-Institution/dp/1936659077/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515027132&sr=1-11&keywords=bill+warner And I have PDF documents of the following: A CHRISTIAN QUR’ĀN? A STUDY IN THE SYRIAC BACKGROUND TO THE LANGUAGE OF THE QUR’ĀN AS PRESENTED IN THE WORK OF CHRISTOPH LUXENBERG Daniel King, Cardiff University ([email protected]) New Perspectives on the Qur'an Gabriel Said Reynolds is Associate Professor of lslamic Studies and Theology at the University of Notre Dame (USA). He is the author of The Qur 'an and Its Biblical Subtext (Routledge 2010), the editor of The Qur 'an in Its Historical Context (Routledge 2008), and the translator of 'A.bd al-Jabbar's A Critique of Christian Origins (Brigham Young University 2010). PROSPECTS AND LIMITS IN THE STUDY OF THE HISTORICAL MUḤAMMAD Andreas Görke The Qur'an in its Historical Context Gabriel Said Reynolds is Associate Professor of lslamic Studies and Theology at the University of Notre Dame (USA). He is the author of The Qur 'an and Its Biblical Subtext (Routledge 2010), the editor of The Qur 'an in Its Historical Context (Routledge 2008), and the translator of 'A.bd al-Jabbar's A Critique of Christian Origins (Brigham Young University 2010). Retelling the Tale: A Computerised Oral-Formulaic Analysis of the Qur’an Presented at the 2014 International Qur’an Studies Association Meeting in San Diego Dr. Andrew G. Bannister, Melbourne School of Theology The Must Know Guide to the Qur’ān for the Western World by TheQuran.com Let me know if you ever want to discuss any.

Again you provide no credentials of your own, and no real response to the OP. Why not admit you are a truthophobe without anything to support you but citing Sharia anti-blasphemy laws? Open dialogue starts with staying on topic, and you have yet to do it. The document and sources are comprehensive, regardless of who wrote it and what your prejudices are about them. If there is something specific in the document you contest, put it forward. Otherwise sweeping statements just allude to your prejudiced and partisan stance on the issue, which isn't helpful in an open discussion.

What do you expect from a political jihadist such as Justin Trudeau? After all, he did take the Shahada in a mosque which is a required ceremony to become a Muslim. He has openly expressed his support and/or capitulation toward FGM and honor killings. He is capitulating to the Islamic doctrine of jizya which is a systemic process of taking non-Muslim resources and channeling them back into the "cause of Allah" just as Barack Obama did with his shady dealings with Iran. He spends tremendous amounts of tax-payer dollars to vacation with Aga Khan and violated ethics rules of conflict of interest. He has opened borders from Muslim-majority regions and capitulating to hijra or civilization-based jihad brokered by globalist George Soros. He pays jizya to convicted terrorists using tax-payer dollars. He is openly mocking Christianity. He allowed the passion of motion M-103 which is Sharia anti-blasphemy arming the left to shut down criticisms of Islam. He calls people in his own house "Islamophobic" etc. But none of this has to do Islam, and Liberals are the best judge in such matters despite the Muslim Brotherhood exclusively using the left to penetrate non-Muslim nations in order to undermine their freedoms owing to their belief that Western nations employ man-made laws while Sharia is the law of the creator of the universe. And to make matters worse, there are idiots on these boards who don't have a clue. Nothing to see here.

From the attached document: Thomas Quiggin, MA, CD Thomas is a court-qualified expert on terrorism (criminal court and federal court) and has had his expertise on the “the reliability of intelligence as evidence” recognized by the Federal Court of Canada. He has also testified as a court expert to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. He was a Senior Fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Thomas has 25 plus years of practical intelligence experience in a variety of positions. These include the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (NSIS/INSET); the Bank of Canada; the Canadian Armed Forces; the United Nations Protection Force in Yugoslavia; Citizenship and Immigration Canada (War Crimes); the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague, and the Privy Council Office of Canada. He was also a qualified arms control inspector for the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty and the Vienna Document. He has also testified to a Senate Committee on intelligence matters (The Kelly Commission, 1998); the Air India Inquiry (2007) as well as providing testimony to the Special Senate Committee on Anti-terrorism (2010) and to the House of Commons on 25 March and 28 May 2015. Thomas holds a Master’s Degree in International Relations and is a certified knowledge management practitioner. He has also provided three training sessions to the Canadian Department of Justice as part of the special advocates program with the focus being on intelligence and evidence. Thomas also has been a guest lecturer at the Canadian Police College with the lectures on terrorism and intelligence. He has spoken at various conferences in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Australia on related matters. Thomas has authored many publications on security and terrorism matters in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, USA, Canada, and Singapore. He has previously published a book on national security titled Seeing the Invisible: National Security Intelligence in an Uncertain Age, (2007, World Scientific). Now what are your credentials, other than believing "Islamophobia" is a legitimate term that can be thrown around to silence critics of political Islam? Regardless of his credentials, in the document provided he provides over 900 (pages 461-549) independent sources for every single claim he makes. Did you check them all? No, because you haven't even opened the document, and rather demonstrate your pro-Sharia sentiments of trying to discredit individuals based on nothing but sweeping statements trying to close down the discussion. Are you part of the Muslim Brotherhood responsible for that term? Why not just admit you are a pro-Sharia anti-democratic shill with absolutely zero respect for open dialogue? Is it because you are a truthophobe? How much more obvious can you make it?

Merriam-Webster Definition of racism 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race 2 a : a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles b : a political or social system founded on racism 3 : racial prejudice or discrimination eyeball's neo-liberal Definition of racism 1 : a belief that criticism of any socio-political entity open to all races which an individual(s) "doesn't like" has a racially motivated undertone 2 a : a sweeping response to criticism contrary to the belief(s) of a neo-liberal resulting in their feelings being hurt b : a political or social system founded on views opposing a bigoted neo-liberal view 3 : prejudice or discrimination according to neo-liberal values 4 : generic term used to decry something he/she does not understand I tested the link and it works fine for me; the link must be being racist for you if it is not cooperating. "Extremely biased" is relative without justification. My intention is not to "debate", it is to discuss - I don't take a default hostile position as you do. The credentials of the authors are provided in the document attached, as the original post indicated. I'm assuming you read neither the post nor the document. Stating Tom Quiggin is a know (sic) far right "Islamophobe" with made-up credentials is attempting to use an illegitimate sweeping term to discredit him, just as motion M-103 is designed to do in order to shut down criticism of political Islam, which is a Sharia-motivated motion. It has become clear to me that your use of the term "Islamophobe" as if it is a legitimate term suggests that either you are pro-Sharia, or ignorant, or both. No socio-political ideology should be protected from criticism. "Islamophobia" is a meaningless term; upon understanding the doctrines of political Islam, there is no irrational fear given the hundreds of millions of people dead as a result of political Islam's employment of various forms of (both military and on-military) jihad. Thank you for outing yourself as pro-Shara and anti-freedom-of-speech. Now the forum knows you are a "truthophobe" regarding political Islam; see both sides can play that game, and it gets nobody anywhere, just as political Islam has got nobody anywhere but in a state of suffering/death.

Pretending to speak on behalf of hundreds upon hundreds of millions is some display of self-aggrandizement; how "liberal" of you. You might want to see a specialist about that. Islam is not a race, and quoting Merriam Webster in regards to anti-Semitism and trying to tie it into a totalitarian socio-political ideology is likewise rather "liberal" of you. This kind of liberalism is becoming a mental illness. Merriam-Webster Definition of racism 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race 2 a : a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles b : a political or social system founded on racism 3 : racial prejudice or discrimination eyeball's neo-liberal Definition of racism 1 : a belief that criticism of any socio-political entity open to all races which an individual(s) "doesn't like" has a racially motivated undertone 2 a : a sweeping response to criticism contrary to the belief(s) of a neo-liberal resulting in their feelings being hurt b : a political or social system founded on views opposing a bigoted neo-liberal view 3 : prejudice or discrimination according to neo-liberal values 4 : generic term used to decry something he/she does not understand

Islam is not a race. Political Islam is an ideology. You can't see facts if you bury your head in the sand and double-down on sweeping and dismissive rhetoric without observing the content and/or discussing why they are not "facts". It is clear you have done absolutely no research into the core tenants of political Islam, the Qur'an, Muhammad, Sharia etc. and would rather pretend these issues don't exist to tout your pluralistic superiority, when in fact, you and people like you are the most destructive people on this planet for not having the competence to "face the facts". Political Islam is a destructive ideology, and those who apologize for it are equally destructive. Hundreds of millions of people are dead because of it, but seeing as how your self-aggrandizement is more important to you in your mind, people like me will continue to shed light on the issue and actually attempt to stand against such oppressive regimes and protect equality.

While I do not support Kevin J. Johnston's brash approach to raising awareness regarding political Islam, he recently hosted the main author of the book Submission: The Danger of Political Islam to Canada (free copy attached) Thomas Quiggin. Placing Kevin J. Johnston aside, Thomas Quiggin explores where Canada is heading under Justin Trudeau: Additionally, here is another (earlier) video with the same author giving a Conference with Raheel Raza (who provided the forward to the same book) at the 2017 Manning Center Conference in Ottawa in February of 2017: I would like to point out that a number of users on here... -Michael Hardner -eyeball -?Impact ...consistently derail threads with spam and rhetoric which contributes absolutely nothing to what should otherwise be a focused dialogue regarding an issue which is not only present in Canada, but almost all Western democracies (France, Sweden Germany, Australia, Britain etc.). Sweeping dismissals such as discrediting individuals due to their associations, character assassination, ad hominem, confusion about what racism actually is etc. without evaluating the merit of the content itself is simply bigotry and I invite all to dismiss it as such. All posts of this nature will be reported as spam. The credentials and backgrounds of the authors can be found in the book attached below. Muslim_Brotherhood_in_Canada.pdf

1. You're attempting to conflate an ideology with a race. That might be why you are automatically assuming I am being "racist" but it is actually your own stupidity responsible for perceiving "it the way" you do. Islam is not a race. If I had described Islam as being mostly Arabs, and the nature of political Islam is owing to Arabs, that would be racist because I am singling out a race, hence race-ism. But as you can see (unless you invent it in your own mind) I have not done that, because I am not a racist. 2. It's indistinguishable from racism because you yourself conflate ideology with race. The confusion exists within you. This is typical for a modern-day liberal who are so far left, there is almost nothing left. Stop projecting your own confusion into others who actually know the distinction. 3. See #1 and #2. 4. See #1 and #2. The parallel you have drawn only exists in your own mind because you yourself are conflating ideology with race. If I criticized Christianity in the same way as I did Islam, does that make me a racist? According to your logic (and neo-liberals), yes it does, which I am more than happy to allow all readers to witness how ridiculous an assertion that is for themselves. 5. Anti-semites are racists, and there is more anti-semitism in the Qur'an than in the whole of Mein Kampf. Muhammad (like Hitler) repeatedly cursed the "Jews" and cut off almost 1000 Jewish heads. The last statement he uttered was cursing Jews. Muslims adopt this man's worldview, hence the blatant anti-semitism within Islam. As such, for you to call me a "racist" when Islam is categorically racist is rather bizarre, but not surprising considering given how warped your perception is. Now if you're done apologizing for racist regimes while calling the people who oppose them racist, why don't you go and parse through your own delusions and work them out. It might be better for you before displaying such confusion on a public forum. If you want to understand what "racism" is, read: Similarly, Hitler was transcribed as saying: "Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers [...] then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world."[209] Speer has stated that when he was discussing with Hitler events which might have occurred had Islam absorbed Europe: "Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country."[207] Hitler was also quoted in the early war years stating, "We shall continue to make disturbances in the Far East and in Arabia. Let us think as men and let us see in these peoples at best lacquered half-apes who are anxious to experience the lash." Taken from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler#Hitler_on_Islam

You picked a good name for yourself. Right; readers here should trust your (sweeping and dismissive) judgment over his, along with the four other authors. Everyone who has spent decades observing these trends in various countries/institutions are completely wrong, and you are right, and your credentials and tenure (on a public internet forum) lend weight to your sweeping dismissal as you sit on a public internet forum and give single-sentence answers in response to several hundreds of pages of research (which you obviously didn't read). Do you realize how stupid this makes you look? Try engaging with the content itself and demonstrate if/where the research is inaccurate. Here is my guess: you either can't, or won't.

Stop misrepresenting other people's views. I oppose all monotheism equally; Christianity is based on a lie started by Constantine that Jesus Christ was a real man who died for the sins of the world. Jesus is the sun; the four Gospels are the four solstices/equinoxes and the twelve Zodiacal signs are the twelve tribes of Israel, twelve apostles etc. It's all nonsense, just as Islam is, but if people choose to believe either, that's up to them. What I don't accept is people believing they have the authority (God-given or otherwise) to treat in a particular way, which is exactly what political Islam does as over 60% of the Qur'an is devoted to handling non-Muslims. It just so happens that Christianity does not have the kind of socio-political substrate that Islam has which is currently trying to corrode the West from within, which is why I'm not bothering to talk about it, though I could at length. Your bigotry is bursting at the seams at this point, and you really strike me as a social jihadist. Do you notice how Michael Hardner is the sole source of sowing discord in every single thread trying to deal with the fascist nature of political Islam? Who is paying you, George Soros? Such sickness of the mind.

You are not a Western pluralist, you are simply ignorant. I have not posted a single piece of misinformation - you only perceive it this way because of the cognitive dissonance that resides within you. Why don't you go read the first page of Genesis and understand why God forbade the Tree of the Knowledge of good and evil. If you eat, you remain in the flesh and suffer successive deaths based on your own ignorance. You are probably one of the most ignorant people I have ever (not) shared discourse with, because you don't read anything, you don't present any argument of substance, no references, no links, no discussion, just constant sweeping dismissive statements because you are anti-discussion, anti-democratic, anti-humanist, and indeed extremely ignorant. If you are as old as you say, you are just a crusty being with absolutely no sense or regard for the future of younger Canadians. I don't care what kinds of posts you have seen. Fear is relative to the individual who chooses to allow it to overcome them, just as peace is internal. If you allow others to have any power whatsoever over your internal state of being (look at how liberals always cry about political correctness) then you are simply a weak individual. Islam has been using fear as a political tool for 1400 years, and the vast majority of Liberals capitulate to it, just as the vast majority of Western powers capitulated to the rise of fascism in the early-mid 20th century based on appeasement, which is the wrong thing to do. You fit into this category precisely. My last girlfriend was a Muslim, guess what happened to her? -She was raped by a family member when she was 6 -She was forced into an arranged marriage wherein her husband beat her regularly -She fled and married a non-Muslim whereupon her father disowned her and told her she is dead to him -She lived out of her car because her family wouldn't take her back and tried to commit suicide twice -Her family told her the only way she is allowed back is if she agreed to become part of a business transaction by being offered as a wife There isn't a single thing above that Muhammad did not do and/or condone. When I tried to understand how someone could treat a woman in this way, that's when I started to research Islam. Not only did I find the root cause of her suffering, but I also inadvertently stumbled across a major source of suffering on the planet as a whole, which is what prompted my research into political Islam. Now individuals such as yourself, in your profound ignorance, obviously have no idea how serious this is as you take refuge in your so-called "pluralism" which is merely a conduit through which political Islam uses to progress its Sharia-motivated agenda. Your kind of attitude is toxic to a free democracy, and given above, it is the ignorance of people like you (and in the Left such as eyeball) that allows such ideologies to penetrate the fabric of free societies to implement a dark-ages mentality that involves the belief that women are property of men. I have attached a document entitled "Sharia Law for Non-Muslims" just to give you an idea of what you are supporting through your "pluralism'; it makes you just as much a part of the problem as political Islam itself, and for this you are a disgusting individual. Sharia_Law_for_Non-Muslims.pdf