hot enough

The one who disgorges emoticons like a wolf feeding pups - all the time.

Betsy, what's the emoticon for totally tongue in cheek?

I know where the problem lies. The USA and its hangers on. I speak to this often. Where have you been?

I think your meme has run its course. Back to your silly allegation that immigration isn't a topic of debate in the US.

Conflating issues is exactly how both of you operate. So many others too, like ... .

All these lies, mostly US lies, as is always the case. All these lies, supported by people who make claims to being honest, good citizens, some even claiming to be "christians". Allowing, encouraging, aiding and abetting US terrorism against the poor of the world. How can these folks pretend they are moral, upright citizens when they defend such obvious evil?

And honest people sit back in silence and some actually support these kinds of distorters of the truth/rank propagandists/... .

Does Fentanyl have any good use in the medical community/profession?

A fine example of America and Americans in action.

The American way, lie, lie lie lie lie and soldier on thru your lies.

What a lame "oh look a squirrel", coming so close on the heels of so many instances of patent dishonesty.

Says another of the top MLW evidence free posters. You highlight your patent dishonesty instead of being honest and acknowledging you don't know what you are talking about. The issue isn't deportation, the issue is that you advanced a falsehood, then lamely tried to cover it up. Is this your third or fourth lame attempt to cover your mistake/turned into a lie?

That hasn't been the case for many years. They all have been active participants in the US terrorist actions against Korea.

Why are you trying to squirm out of your silly mistake that the topic at hand is not a debatable one, is not something that is, in fact, being debating in the US? Do you understand the word 'dishonest'?

Exactly as I described - you caught yourself out again and so you flee to the B_C Numero Uno meme! Why do you so despise the truth and facts?

Always carefully circumspect blather because you know how easily you will catch yourself out, exposing your, shall we say, naivete.

Ignorant even of things US. There are many many people debating these things as we can see by, http://www.apsanlaw.com/law-246.List-of-Sanctuary-cities.html and http://ojjpac.org/sanctuary.asp

Are you now parroting B_C? This information, in and of itself, totally demolishing the USGOCT, has been posted before. It is from an airline accident investigator, an ex-military US Colonel.

Another of the myriad famous Michael Hardner exit lines. I am amazed by your inability to read and understand. Actually, I'm not. I know that you are using the "Given that you dispute that the planes hit the building," as a phony support for another of the famous Michael Hardner exit lines. How phony is it for you to advance this, excuse me, utter drivel? It is me that has brought forward the wrong engine facts. How can you draw the totally illogical conclusion from that that I say no planes hit the buildings. Consider just the questions I've posed to you today, how many stark realities you simply will not even face up to. You haven't addressed a one, except to obfuscate, distract, cover up, plan your escape.

Your naivete borders on the MLW unmentionables. It comes from a deep addiction to propaganda. It's the same brainwashing that occurs in evangelical "christanity". You can escape this prison if you think.

Very lame, Michael. Why have you fled from the 911 thread? Of course discussion is possible but you illustrate clearly that you have no desire to engage in honest discussion. You avoid these issues solely because you hold a childish fantasy of what the USA is all about. I had the same fantasy, it was at least as strong as yours but a funny thing happened, the truth got in the way. You directly avoid direct questions, opting for your song and dance routines, see above for a good example. The very truth you are now running from, as you always do. That is not the American way, Michael. You don't even believe in the grandiose tenets of the USA but you sure are making use of the usual US duck and cover platitudes.

It's apparent that even sarcasm escapes you, Betsy.

Who controls Saudi Arabia and Quatar, Michael? Come on, do you think that these countries live in a vacuum, that they don't know of Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, ... all the countries the US/UK rearranged in the ME? Still no evidence. Do you need a bigger shovel?

Did you miss that Omni's posts are as evidence free as yours?