Omni

Maybe not. http://globalnews.ca/news/3231630/trudeau-over-trump-more-americans-prefer-pm-as-their-president-ipsos-poll/

No he prefers to hide out in a dressing room and then he makes it a full on sexual assault. Could get him impeached.

Thank you fro proving the point of my post above. But thanks for keeping so close to Canadian media. Spending too much time at Faux news is not good.

Don't hold your breath waiting for any meaningful reply.

You either have a death penalty law or you don't. Wouldn't you agree that wrongful convictions is at least one good reason NOT to have it?

There are already a number of issues that could get him impeached. The emoluments clause is one, breaching the INA immigration law of 1965, renewed sexual offences, just to name a few. And let's see, we're all of 3 weeks into his "reign"? Stay tuned.

Trump overstepped the 1965 INA immigration law. Judges have the task of upholding the law. Trump loses.

You should try following the thread.

You need new evidence for that. Being re-habed is not even a consideration.

North Korea is being mentioned a lot lately.

Looking to not have innocent people put to death. And then of course there is the huge costs incurred by the state by the time the appeals are exhausted. Much more effective use of tax dollars is professional evaluations and review boards.

Then of course there are the situations where DNA has no bearing but the accused hasn't the money to hire a competent lawyer.

Not some retired general, a man by the name of John Brennan. And then there are a few former secretary's of state. You know, people that have experience dealing with security issues.

Killing a killer is still killing. DNA testing in the US showed that there were numbers of people on death row who were innocent. How many did they kill before DNA testing was available I wonder?

One of the things that is NOT wrong with it is we had the good sense to get rid of the death penalty long ago. A lot of countries that are not democracy's still have it.

Well all I can suggest for you is to just read what the judges wrote. And just to catch you up, the CIA asked Trump not to do the ban, but obviously but he didn't listen.

Turcotte was found guilty at re-trial. There has not been a re trial in this case. Big difference.

If Trump was listening to the CIA he would have taken their advice and not tried to create this ban. Michael Hayden the former NSA/CIA director called it "an abomination" and it won't make the US or it's allies any safer.

One of the legal arguments against the ban is that it is against countries who have not harmed the US. Another is that it targets a specific religion.

Trump over stepped his powers and so the courts gave him a smack down. He does need to either read more or get proper legal advice.

The founding fathers are long gone by now. State legislatures have redrawn many district boundaries and they are a partisan bunch and effect the numbers of EC reps. per state. Kind of like instead of the voters picking their reps., the reps. pick their voters. That's gerrymandering, plain and simple.

So it's not a wonder why US health care is so over priced. People with bucks in their pockets just walk into clinics and demand procedures simply because they feel like it andthey got the money. Brilliant!

You'll have to go to America to find that type of "fun".

That's correct, and it (the EC) is highly gerrymandered. They ought to dump it.

He actually was elected by a majority of the voters for starters.