Omni

Well you missed the point yet again, but at least it didn't take you multiple pages to demonstrate it, this time.

Ha ha, now that's rich coming from an mericun. Oh yeah, it's THAT mericun. Carry on then, boy.

Why waste so much time fretting over the God issue while you're in this world. I'll happily wait until I kick the bucket and head to the next world where I'll meet up with the boy then, when it's appropriate. Too many people have been murdered by these religious freaks in this world.

Evidence that is accepted only by those who have been led by the nose into believing it.

Let me guess, I bet you hang on every word out of Kelly Anne's mouth

Now pick up your toys and go home.

BTW, it's an accord, not a contract. There's a difference. ! country is out, that's the US. Major energy companys are ignoring Trump with regard to the accord. Try to keep up, or shut up.

Yes please.

All you just did is reiterate what I just told you. Do you have trouble reading? Oh and here's a fairly simple question for you: how many countries have not signed on to the Paris Accord?

Paris accord is not a binding contract idiot.

Ditto.

A couple of little companies have said they will ignore Trump and sign onto the Paris Accord regardless. Let's see what were their names, oh yeah, Exxon-Mobil/Conoco Phillips. Ever heard of them? Now stop the thread drift.

Apparently you are unaware of the shit show of an economy that was handed to Obama and how he turned it around. And also unaware this thread is about Trudeau. Try to stay on track.

Taxme seems to live inside a star trek game show, just read his posts.

You and taxme make quite the colorful couple. Perhaps you should give him that civics class as suggested. Ah, on second thought that might not be an improvement.

Basically it seems like you don't like Trudeau. like Trump, don't know much about global warming. How many countries, is your rough estimation, are not on board with the Paris Accord? Give you a hint, count on your nose, not your toes.

I don't always agree with Argus, but it seems we both have your number. Just saying.

One minute you tell us you ignore those sources, the next you say you don't believe them. Credibility shot to hell as usual.

Your response, as usual, does nothing to support your comments. Please try a little harder.

Both of these people actually studied and know law. Both had sat on the bench prior to their appointment. Kagan taught law. Maybe try doing a little research before wasting peoples time with nonsense.

Ah nope, they're in the news business. Your source is entertainment. Even they admit it, so I don't why you are being so dumb.

Here's one of your "reliable sources" https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/14/1620475/-Fox-News-Is-NOT-News-Network-s-Own-Ads-Label-Its-Programming-As-Entertainment

You can look around and find other sources that will tell you the same thing. http://www.jurist.org/paperchase/2017/03/un-israel-has-not-moved-to-stop-illegal-settlements.php

Can you try and name us one?

I move around quite a bit: NPR, NY Times, CBC, CNN, BBC, Globe and Mail, you know, people who fact check and where you can cross check. Unlike where you seem to get your phony crap such as" Objective viewers have long ago concluded that Fox News is not, and never has been, a legitimate news network. They began as a project by right-wing propagandist Rupert Murdoch and Republican media strategist Roger Ailes to spread disinformation and promote GOP politicians. And for the past 17 years they have carried out that mission with a roster of rabidly partisan hosts broadcasting provable lies. https://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=27363