Altai

I have asked to my father about the issue because he was raised in a village and his family had many animals including cows. He confirms what you say. I always thought that cows continuously produce milk. I hate people who insisnt on their mistakes and currently I hate myself.

Due to the opposite reason why Africans are underweight.

I think we have discussed this before. They are not Muslims. If Muslims would like to carry out terror attacks, you could not even take a single step on your street.

Cows also give milk when they dont have babies. They always produce milk and they produce much higher amounts when compared to other animals which you mentioned. Women does not produce milk when they dont have babies because of some hormones such as prolactin, so its a wrong proposition.

Why do cows give us milk ? There is no any other creature on the earth other than human and baby cows benefits from it. If there is no human, what would happen to their milk, it would just cause them to suffer.

Its ridicilous to say %50, there are averagely 300 billion suns in our galaxy and its a crazy possibility to have only one of them near our World.

Can you calculate the possibility of having only one Sun around the World ? Its crazy !!!

I dont say these things alone are proof for the existence of God. I say there are many many examples like these ones and mathematically its impossible these much of possibilities to happen at the same time. We need to cook our foods and da daaa, there is fire. It was 50% probability to happen and it happen "by chance". Blue color gives us feeling of eternity and da daaaa the sky is colored blue, it was %14 probability to happen and it happened "by chance" again. We need to rest and da daaa, there is night. It was %50 probability to happen and it happened "by chance". There are billions even more such things happens and its impposible to happen "by chance".

I show you the credible evidences and you ignore them. Adaptation aims to simplify, not to complicate. Cooking something is simple than making it sushi.

So there is no God because you are able to make Sushi Cooking something instead of making it sushi is much simpler and human will prefer to follow simplest way. This is why God gave us "fire".

He trys to explain me the scientific fact behind the color of the sky, despite I explained him that I am not seeking for it but seeking for whether or not there is a specific reason for it to be "blue". He was insistently trying to tell me about optical rules in physics LoL. There are three options; first he may have a quite low IQ, second he dont understand me because of my broken English, as third he was trolling me. I thought that the last option outweighs.

We prefer to cook because of the survival instinct. Cooking has many benefits for our healt when compared to eat somethings raw. Ofcourse you can live by eating fruits and some specific vegetables raw and after a while you will start to experience some health problems because of the lack of some foods which you "should eat" cooked. Sushi is also made with a kind of cooking method and includes so much salt which is quite harmful for your healt and its much more possible to have bacterial induced diseases through sushi, when compared to cooking. Please stop denying the logic.

Then why we have been adapted to cook ? Adaptation is defense mechanism which we improve in accordance with our needs. So we cook our meals because we "need" to cook it. If it was not a necessity as you claimed, we would adapt to eat them raw. You are the one talking with zero logic. I talk based on logic, you deny the logic just because it does not fit with your interests.

Atheists are ignoring the facts that there are billions maybe more of benefits for humankind and other living beings to survive and resume their lives. I just give simple examples trying to think like as a person who is living in ancient times with least scientific discoveries. If I start to think according to today, it will be much clearer that there is God. If I was living in the stone age, how could I see the evidences around me about the perfect order in the nature ? Fire was a good example for it. We didnt adapt to eat things raw, we need to cook them and there is fire and there are many auxiliary elements in the nature for us to have fire. This is the point where atheist logic fails but you dont accept your mistake, you insist on your mistake. This is sad.

Why we didnt "adapt" to see other colors ?

Are you aware of it how you have a closed mind to think about the existence of a creature power. I am still not sure why the sky is blue ? Yes its because of some optical events, but why "blue", are there a special reason for it ? What would happen if it was another color ? Would we be adapted it too ? Or would it harm us ? I dont want to start another point of discuss but you are forcing me to do it by giving me some trump cards in your post, on purpose or unconsciously. For example you said "fire". Why we need to cook many of our dishes ? Why we didnt adapt to eat them without cooking ? Why it tastes better when we cook it ? By coincidence ?

This is a bit Ottoman Turkish and perfect lyrics.

You still dont even understand what I mean. I am not asking for how come the sky scientifically appears in blue color. I am asking "why". It was first explained by a Muslim scientist that how sky appears in blue color. Okay !!! Please.

I think we need to decide first whether or not there is God. Then we could discuss about which religion or belief is the true one, as a second step.

I am going to ignore you too if you keep trolling my topics.

I started this topic not to derail another topic. So atheist posters claim anything is occurred by chance and I challenge their claim. So they claim "we eat because of there are somethings to eat" and I claim "we eat because of we need to eat and there are somethings created to eat". I said the sky is blue and blue is a beautiful color which has various benefits on human and God especially chose this color to design sky. Another poster said it has benefits because human adapted to it to have benefits. He meant if it was green or red, we would adapted to have the same benefits from these colors. (correct me if I am wrong) ok. No, it's the way the human body uses it for its own need. Because the earth is rotating. The humans living in poles are using artificial lights to help them live like if they were to what they are used to live. It takes several thousands of year for species to adapt to a new environment. Some can't and they extinct. Humanids exist for over several hundred of thousand years. The people living in poles are there for just few thousands. So you say that people who live in poles were actually living more closer to the equator and they were adapted to sleep in nights and stay awake during the day and they still dont sleep for 6 months because they didnt stay long enough to adapt 6 months of days and 6 months of nights. Beucase several thousands years are needed and they are just there for a few thousands years. (I really cant believe how science been abused, okay I wont laugh) Then why they dont gradually get used to stay awake longer and sleep longer than the people who live much closer to the equator line ? Maybe they are still not able to sleep for 6 months but they should at least sleep a few weeks uninterrupted, is not it ? This is your theory.

I really dont understand that why do you write this much and dont read big part of your post. I am not interested with your thoughts about religious people. I have asked a simple question and you have been failed to reply it. Please read my question in my pre-post again.