Shady
-
Posts
20,848 -
Joined
-
Days Won
135
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Shady
-
-
Has anyone listened to Joe Rogan’s recent conversation with Bret Weinstein, about covid and covid vaccines? It’s absolutely terrifying.
-
23 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:
Are these people asylum seekers though?
Everyone coming over says they’re an asylum seeker. It’s a loop hole in the system. There are no countries in central and South America that qualify as countries to seek asylum from. They don’t generally meet the standard needed. But how many millions of people do you think the United States should be forced to accept?
-
Biden did ask the Saudis to delay the cut until after the election. Now he’s going to stop weapons sales to them in retaliation. Remember when that was impeachable?
Now Biden is tapping the strategic petroleum reserve to try to minimize election losses. That should be impeachable. The reserve is at a 40 year low because of Biden actions in trying to shield Americans from his terrible policies.
-
2
-
-
5 hours ago, dialamah said:
Does this include Muslims praying before a game?
You mean after the game? On a voluntary basis?
-
Yes, Eyeball has not laid out in detail how his plan would work. Would an MP have to notify some agency if they're at a lunch with a lobbyist? Would they have to stream the conversation online or something so that the public can listen in? I just don't get the logistics of so-called in camera lobbying.
-
Aren’t there already laws against corruption? Some people are caught, some aren’t. I still haven’t heard of any workable solution.
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, eyeball said:
How do you know it's unworkable? No one has even tried. You just lack the will.
In any case given the apparent ubiquity of corruption coupled with the unwillingness of society to really for much about it I figure we should embrace it and let it take care of #1.
Where's the downside?
You haven’t proposed how to enact any of this. Once again, how do you propose having the public listen in on conversations that take place in restaurants, bars, sporting events, coffee shops etc? Please provide details.
-
1
-
-
45 minutes ago, Great American said:
The party of science! ?
-
2
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, eyeball said:
I've never ever said anything about banning talking.
I'm simply advocating that we allow the public to listen. You've never acknowledged that. Not once, not ever.
But it’s unworkable. How do you propose the public listens in on conversations at bars, restaurants, sporting events etc?
-
-
On 5/1/2022 at 10:39 PM, eyeball said:
No, I mean lobbying.
I wouldn't end lobbying, I'd simply make the practice subject to changes and amendments to the existing Lobbying Act; primarily a principle that states the public has a
rightresponsibility to attend the lobbying of public officials when discussing issues in the public's domain.That’s completely unworkable. So you want the public invited to say a dinner between two people at a restaurant? Or somebody’s living room? Or at a bar? Or hockey game? Lobbying is just talking. You can’t ban talking or somebody advocating on behalf of their industry. Now, if money or goods changed hands, that would be illegal. Those laws already exist. The real solution is to make the government’s involvement, and impact on various industries much less significant.
-
Just now, Oksanna said:
There's nothing scientific about it. You are trying to tell me that you don't care about killing hundreds of thousands of lives, but I should be on board with forcing women to sacrifice their lives and bodies because you think an ultrasound is pretty. Give me a break.
What’s not scientific about? Be specific.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Oksanna said:
Yeah, very scientific. JFC
What’s not scientific about it?
-
2 minutes ago, Oksanna said:
Lol, "If you won't agree my lies are science I can't even play this game anymore."
Believe me, I've had plenty of these conversations. Don't get your 'science' from ben shapiro.
You don’t have to believe me. Just take a look at a 3D ultrasound. It’s quite something when they turn up the volume as well, and you can listen to the tiny heart beating. Sometimes you can even watch the unborn child sucking it’s thumb.
-
2 minutes ago, Oksanna said:
Neither is a blastocyst. And listen you little weasel, you are a sheltered little boy, but considering who I'm talking to I'm pretty damned calm.
If you’re going to continue to deny prenatal science, then there’s really no point in carrying on this conversation.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Oksanna said:
An earthworm has a beating heart. There's no science there. We also know it has nothing to do with the sanctity of human life. This is about things like making women suffer for having sex. making sure they don't have a chance to move up in society, those kinds of things.
An earthworm isn’t human. Humans don’t produce earthworms. According to the laws of genetics, humans produce other humans. You’re becoming unhinged. Take a deep breath and calm down.
-
9 minutes ago, Oksanna said:
Oh it's completely relevant. And it has everything to do with it. There can be no other explanation. You either hate human life and your country, you are just a traitor who is too scared to do anything for your country and you don't care about human life, or you did all you could to get vaccinated and get everyone else vaccinated too.
So, are you a terrorist, turncoat, or pro-vaccine?
You’re still not making any sense or any substantive point regarding an unborn baby with a beating heart etc. Recognizing prenatal science is paramount to understanding the issue.
-
Just now, Oksanna said:
You want to more to prove weakness? Why am I so much more of a man than you?
You’re not making any sense again.
-
5 minutes ago, Oksanna said:
If you are such a massive coward that a little shot is too much for you, then you sure as hell are lying about pretending you care about human life.
Cowardice has nothing to do with somebody’s fundamental rights. It’s irrelevant. Either is caring, or pretending to care about human life. What I care about or pretend to care about is also irrelevant.
-
17 minutes ago, West said:
I asked Oksana if they should have to prove they've never had an abortion to those store owners who want to know. Didn't really get a response
Exactly. They pick and choose when medical privacy exists.
-
4 hours ago, Oksanna said:
You mean the 0.000000001% of abortions that constitute this example? I’m all for that exception. 99.9% of people are.
-
6 hours ago, Oksanna said:
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion
I mean blastocysts aren't people.
Never mind all the super intrusive things this opens the door to. Heck, blowjobs used to be illegal.
You’re not making any sense. Unborn babies, with heartbeats, etc, that feel pain, are the issue. Super intrusive? You mean like the government forcing you to inject chemicals into your body? Then having to prove publicly that you had said chemicals injected into your body to go to the grocery store, or to keep your job. Get the eff outta here.
-
12 hours ago, Oksanna said:
Well, as I always need to point out, then you have killed billions. And this will mean outright bans on abortion, or have you not met the insurrectionist party? "Up to the states" means "we want to remove this right."
You have killed women with this. Not your little magical spirits, REAL women will die because of this. No doubt about it.
How are real women going to die? What’s a real women anyways? Are there fake women? Are you referring to trans women or something?
-
1
-
-
On 5/3/2022 at 10:14 PM, Oksanna said:
Of course it will.
Abortion kills women every single day. Unborn women. Regardless, overturning Roe v Wade doesn’t ban abortion. Roe v Wade isn’t a law. Overturning it means that it will be regulated the same way other rights are regulated. Like speech, second amendment, etc. At least half of the country will see no change. A quarter more will see some change, but abortion will remain legal up to a certain point. Only a handful of states, but probably none, might ban abortion outright. Someone looking to have an abortion will just need to find a neighbouring state to have the procedure. Furthermore, Democrats had the chance to codify abortion into actual law several times and chose not to. There’s literally a bill that’s been sitting in committee for almost a year that Democrats have never brought to a vote. Instead, they’ve been lazy, and relied on a 50 year old abortion ruling that was based on privacy, not body autonomy.
But it’s nice to see that medical privacy and body autonomy are once again a thing now! Funny how that worked.
Anti-vax buffoons blame Presley's death on Covid vaccine
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted
It’s not a pandemic of the unvaccinated anymore.
COVID No Longer 'Pandemic of the Unvaccinated'
https://www.webmd.com/covid/news/20221127/more-vaccinated-people-dying-of-covid-as-fewer-get-booster-shots