dialamah

Does this mean you are in favor of laws forbidding niqabs and/or hijabs?

What a remarkably stupid thing for you to say.

Says the guy who resorts to calling people liars when he can't come up with any kind of rational response.

The other forum has dissenting views, both right wing and left wing posters. It has a lot less name-calling, sneering and general rudeness.

I see. "Tugging off" a headscarf or yamaka is physical violence and illegal. I don't think they should get a pass. But good to know where you stand.

Oh, about that "handful", it was 159 in 2015, slightly less than the 170something against Jews. How many and how serious do they have to be before we should worry?

And, for the fourth or fifth time, do you also dismiss those same sorts of crimes against Jews as minor and hardly worth concerning ourselves over?

Except I don't. I condemn those murders but I also condemn posters on this forum for their constant broad brush painting of all Muslims as terrorists, incipient terrorists and too backwards to fit into Western society. And most Muslims are peaceful, just as most Americans are peaceful, despite their near weekly mass shooting events.

Oh right. Just the little stuff, graffiti, hate messages, setting fire to mosques and cars, death threats, verbal attacks, physical attacks, shooting them while they pray. But shooting only happened that one time, nobody else has died so nothing to worry about. But OMG, that poster said "you are wrong about what you believe about Muslims" and you have to be all over that.

You once again fail to read what I actually write. ISIS ideology is conversion or death, which is not mainstream Islam. But I have said, twice today already I believe, that other religions in Muslim majority countries have second class status.

Really? I said you didn't denounce Argus for saying that crimes against Muslims are minor, or PIK & friend for saying Muslims deserve violence against them. You read this as me accusing you of ripping off a hijab or laughing and egging on a harasser. This certainly explains why our conversations never go anywhere.

Answer the question: why do you accept the violent ideology over the peaceful one, when both are rejected by mainstream Islam?

Oh, so dramatic!

Mainstream Islam does not accept conversion by sword or death to non-believers. If ISIS belief was mainstream, there wouldn't be any other religions in any Muslim country.

Yes, why are you so tolerant of false and hateful anti-Muslim rhetoric and so intolerant of me pointing it out? Why do you so often misstate what I say and attribute things to me I have never said? You could see her, right? You can't see the fear and pain in the faces of the women on the street when they are verbally harassed or have their hijab pulled off, the kind of crime that Argus dismisses as "minor", so you don't object to that.

Yes, mainstream Islam rejects Ahmediyya ideology and ISIS ideology. The question is why do YOU keep pushing the violent ISIS ideology as Islamic, but denying the peaceful Ahmeiyya one as un-Islamic?

Can you explain to me why you reject Ahmadiyya ideology because mainstream Islam does, but accept ISIS ideology even though its rejected by mainstream Islam?

Too bad more Germans didn't speak out against anti-Jewish propaganda isn't it. Perhaps if they had, we wouldn't have had to endure the slaughter of millions of innocent people.

Even once would be a change, especially when the "unflattering" statement is a steaming pile of horsepoo.

FFS. What I say is that Muslims regularly denounce terrorism all over the place, but people in anti-Muslim mode never notice. Really? Show me that. I notice that you still haven't denounced those on this forum who think Canadian violence against Muslims is acceptable.

Maybe, but perhaps she has thoughts separate from you. We will see.

Better that than buying into the paranoid ramblings of some goof on the internet.

Read, carefully: When do you denounce the kind of hateful rhetoric that led to Bissonette shooting 19 people? You do not; you support it, and agree with it. In other words, you support and agree with the kind of hateful rhetoric that demonizes Muslims and leads to people like Bissonette to take action.

You are entitled to your opinion.

Everything was explained at the time, so not.going to explain it again for you. Its not unusual for media to stop covering mass shootings that aren't Muslim related - as I have noted many times on this forum. Sorry you find it hard to accept facts that don't jive with your narrative.