WWWTT

Good luck with that one then. WWWTT

I'm not sure about the 55% figure?(I would take that with a grain of salt). But labour is usually a big part of operating costs. In fact,55% is not really that big of a number and I feel it may be a little too low! WWWTT

What does this comment have to do with my comment to AW???

Sounds like your throwing up your arms and are almost ready to admit that the US did a bad thing. Just a couple more steps and you're there,you can do it AW! WWWTT

I'm sure every Canadian leader(except Harper and Brian Mulroney) have said the same about the US. If they didn't,they would lose votes in the next Canadian election! WWWTT

Different issue there Derek. Go start another thread about Libya and/or Mali and if I choose to add comment we will then debate. But you seem to always be for war,death and destruction so I know what side you will be on. Until then lets get back to the shame of the US's failure,otherwise you are only posting "strawmen" in hopes to win some points in already well documented ongoing US failure! WWWTT

The one big lesson the US did learn from the Vietnam era was don't show US troops/war machine killing people on US TV sets. That's why the US government hunts down Wikileaks like a rabid dog! How about watching a family in Iraq getting mowed down by machine gun fire from an attack helicopter then say "Well that's to bad for them,USA,USA,USA" WWWTT

Behold,Stawman,in all its glory! WWWTT

You have a link to back your claim? From what I remember,someone on this thread provided a link that put your view in a lower ranked level of popularity. WWWTT

That pretty much sums it up punked. Justin is riding this vague political view in hopes that the voter will project their views upon him to some kind of all new high! At some point of time,he is going to have to talk. And at this rate,he is in jeopardy of pulling an Ignatieff.Losing his own seat! The liberals are on a good,hard long skid,and I don't see how this Justin guy can out compete the seasoned political heavyweights. I remember Ignatieff and other liberals a few years ago saying that they were going to pull a rabbit out of the hat,never happened. WWWTT

At least we are all here to discuss the shame of the disgraceful acts of the US. WWWTT

Ah so we finally get to the root of Bush's desire to expediate the US invasion. The Iraq's could never be co operating because the US must invade! WWWTT

Link please.Because your story is changing WWWTT

False Unless you can provide a link showing Germany with a weaker performance than Canada? Germany is a G7 country,no? WWWTT

May the real RNG please stand up. WWWTT

Based upon your comments,I would say that bush_cheney2004=Shady! WWWTT

Not towards 2002 and 2003 Shady. In fact,Iraq was co operating so well,and the inspectors liked what they were seeing so much,sanctions would have to be lifted. But that's when Bush and his war pigs started escalating their false accusations and propaganda. WWWTT

Shady is just another typical conservative that wants to silence the press like some dictators do!(Harper maybe?) WWWTT

Actually,affirmative action has nothing to do with the elimination/reduction of standards. But you always seem fixated to imply to everyone that because he is half African,then he is not as smart/responsible/good judge of character/articulate as if a white person would be. Rob Ford pretty much gets what he deserves because him and his brother stick their neck out and try to fool everyone,like paying for councilor and mayor expenses out of their own pocket! There are lots of conservatives that don't stick their neck out like Rob Ford or Doug,so those conservatives are harder to criticize. But not the Ford brothers,their the gift that keeps giving! Oh and by the way,do you have the link about Rob Ford sneezing??? WWWTT

Actually if I recall correctly,after Saddam started to finally co operate and it was shown by the inspectors,sanctions should have been lifted! Now that's the real reason why the US invaded,wasn't it? WWWTT

Oh no,I clearly understood what she was writing in this case. I'm just not going to further entertain her ramblings. She does this sidestepping all the time. When she does not like your response,she changes the subject by trying to point fault towards you. Very simple but annoying tactic really. And not a very good one. WWWTT

Actually Shady,being overweight is considered an disability. And since Ford is overweight (you got to be kidding me if you disagree),Ford can be considered an affirmative action Mayor! So that would mean that Ford was only elected mayor because he is fat. But that would not be logical because affirmative action is only in reference to hiring practices by an employer.So therefore I would never call/accuse an elected official of being elected through affirmative action See what I just did there Shady? WWWTT

I completely understand how you always want the debate to be about "you" and what it is "you" are writing. And when you don't like the answer you get,then it's all about how "I" do not understand "you" This is classic AW debate policy. WWWTT