This is a litany of hate. These threads discussing it are not.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=2016&utm_content=bufferb1a0d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
This week in the religion of peace:
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/38350662
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2016_Istanbul_bombings
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botroseya_Church_bombing
http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/Suicide-bomber-kills-seven-in-Libyas-Benghazi-officials-1001613266
There were a lot of other ones. Peace.
If you want to get picky about history you may choose to say 5 million Jews were killed. You may say 6 million jews were killed. Can you interpret history to say no Jews were killed because that doesn't fit your agenda?
Science can't agree because unlike religion it isn't based on faith. When something is proved wrong it us amended. That is why there are very few scientific laws.
Oh, so now when we discuss things like history and facts its what they mean to the individual. I didn't know history was open to interpretation. That post so fits in this thread. Feeling those feelings man.
A step in the right direction? At least some of the students know how ridiculous this is.
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/12/16/laurier-graduate-students-group-shuts-down-caf-over-slave-joke-in-job-ad.html
Sorry. You erroneously stated the fact that Islam has lnot been the West's historical enemy as history clwarly shiws it gas. As we were talking about the history of West vs Islam.....
Generalaties are used when communicating. I hope you maintain this strict adherence to verbatim, to the letter etc.
I find it ironic you say this when it was you who claimed history was an opinion.
The reason you are sensitive to the optics of thus thread is it usually is the left who toss off common sense in their pursuit of PC.
The media is a huge part of it I agree. How ever many people are heavily invested in this ideology. I had a long debate on this forum because people actually deny history of tensions between the West and Islam. Having people admit was is going on now us hopwless imo.
The media is a huge part of it I agree. How ever many people are heavily invested in this ideology. I had a long debate on this forum because people actually deny history of tensions between the West and Islam. Having people admit what is going on now is hopeless imo.
There is now no report button though if you have a complaibt you are to post it here or something.
The thread"Deep Information Pool"is as ridiculous as I have seen there yet mods ok it. I posted several times and they were deleted.
As no report button I reported it there. Posts deleted. Wrote mod cordial letter...was told the thread is fine. and told to report here.
In other words, don't report.
Not on MLW where selectve history reigns supreme.
Phelps etal are the reason I am suspicious of "a Christian values".
Sliding scale?
You blatantly admit to purposely derailing a thread that I know a moderator is following and not word one. Not complaining cause Greg etal are sick of that. Just observing.
When religion alone is not to blame we can
nm
Timothy McVeigh mostly killed other Christian.
Not sure if poe or facetious?
The ban on pitbulls came in 2005.
Bites keep rising. Proof positive BSL doesn't work.
http://m.torontosun.com/2016/12/14/council-puts-bite-on-dangerous-dogs
The ban on pitbulls came in 2005.
Bites keep rising. Proof positive BSL doesn't work.
http://m.torontosun.com/2016/12/14/council-puts-bite-on-dangerous-dogs
German shepherds, Rottweillet's, Dobermans Pinschers....not common? Coross, Akitas, Mastiffs, Boxers????
Where vould you possibly be lving that you would consider these dogs uncommon?
That's actually the opposite of anecdotal.
You take x amount of dangerous dogs.
48 are deemed rehabilitatable.
1 is deemed.
Therefore 99.08 are rehabilitated.
.02 are deemed are deemed unable to be rehabilitated. Pretty god damn incredible.
Remember these dogs have been horrifically abused.