August1991 Posted October 5, 2007 Report Posted October 5, 2007 (edited) I started a thread elsewhere about the Death of the Parti Quebecois. And another about the Enigma of Quebec City. I think these comments of Jean Garon worthy of another thread. Louise Harel is the Dan Heap of Quebec politics. She's a Leftist elected in a poor, urban riding. Jean Garon is the Eugene Whelan of Quebec politics. A smart farmer from a rural district. Jean Garon and Louise Harel were both ministers in Levesque's PQ government. Now, Harel is still in the PQ caucus but Garon has said he supports the ADQ. Upon learning this, Harel responded: Parti Quebecois MNAs are playing down the conversion of two long-time sovereignists to the Action Democratique. Over the weekend, former PQ minister Jean Garon, and former Hydro Quebec president Andre Caille took part in an ADQ general council meeting. Caille has expressed interest in running for the party. "They're has-beens," said longtime Hochelaga-Maisonneuve MNA Louise Harel, arriving for a PQ caucus meeting in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu. ADQ leader Mario Dumont denounced the comments, which he said were especially inappropriate, coming from the PQ's critic on issues facing the elderly. "The use of that expression clearly means in some way that (you think) at a certain age people's... contribution to Quebec society is not welcome anymore," said Dumont. But, Dumont says the fact the two sovereignists are now backing his party is a sign Quebec has moved on to new issues, and away from what he calls "the old debate" over sovereignty. The ADQ leader is demanding an apology from PQ leader Pauline Marois over Harel's comments. Later in the day, Harel apologized. She says the comments had nothing to do with Garon and Caille's age. The former municipal affairs minister pointed out Garon says he remains a sovereignist. Rousseau MNA Francois Legault, and Chicoutimi MNA Stephane Bedard however, added they felt both men were "opportunists." CJAD Jean Garon is the one to watch here. He was a popular - and intelligent - agriculture minister but gruff, down-to-earth and honest. I imagine that the remnants of the PQ are upset. (Note the reference to "opportunism". How else to characterize Pauline Marois' decision to delay a referendum?) Garon responded in an interview: Traité de has been hier, par Louise Harel, son ex-collègue au Conseil des ministres Jean Garon avait une réplique toute prête : « Elle est en maudit après moi parce que j’ai dit que c’est elle qui a nui le plus au PQ avec les fusions municipales forcées. Elle n’avait même pas de mandat pour le faire, ça n’a jamais été dans le programme. »« Je suis allé chercher pas mal plus de votes pour le PQ que Louise Harel, poursuit M. Garon. Elle a une façon de penser marginale. Hochelaga-Maisonneuve, ce n’est pas le Québec au complet. » M. Garon précise par ailleurs que son intérêt actuel pour l’ADQ ne signifie pas pour autant qu’il n’est plus indépendantiste. « Il y a eu deux référendums et ça n’a pas passé. Ça ne veut pas dire que quelqu’un qui était pour ça est contre ça. Sauf que l’enjeu, actuellement, n’est pas là et même le PQ, dans leur programme, ont changé complètement leur formulation. Les has been, c’est plutôt eux. » Jean Garon juge par ailleurs que dans le contexte, celui d’un Québec « qui n’a jamais été divisé comme il l’est actuellement », dit-il, Mario Dumont apparaît comme le leader qui a le plus de talents de « rassembleur ». « Je trouve que Mario Dumont comprend mieux les régions du Québec, leur façon de penser, et la région de Québec. Et il va percer aussi à Montréal, les sondages commencent à le montrer de plus en plus. Et là, ça va faire un Québec qui est plus pensé comme un ensemble. » « Le PQ et le Bloc, c’est le Plateau-Mont-Royal, et même plus petit que ça, lance l’ex-ministre péquiste. Les gens réagissent à ça. Ce n’est pas pour rien qu’à la grandeur du Québec, en dehors de Montréal, l’ADQ a fait une grosse percée. Ils sentent qu’ils sont plus représentés de cette façon. Les gens sont tannés de se faire dire par Montréal quoi penser. » La PresseGaron states that his interest for the ADQ does not mean that he's no longer an independantiste (as the journalist interprest his words). Garon says: "There were two referendums and it didn't pass. That doesn't mean that someone who was for is now against. It's just that the stakes now are not the same and even the PQ, in its programme, has changed its approach. The 'has beens' are rather the PQ." ---- There's a divide taking place in Quebec, like in the US and Canada. Montreal is a blue state and the rest of Quebec is a red state. Edited October 5, 2007 by August1991 Quote
Visionseeker Posted October 5, 2007 Report Posted October 5, 2007 There's a divide taking place in Quebec, like in the US and Canada. Montreal is a blue state and the rest of Quebec is a red state. That is one way of looking at it. But I look at the divide as something more significant. Born from the reasonable accommodation movement, the ADQ racial mentality will eventually give rise to a progressive counter movement centres itself on both the provincial and even federal charters. Quote
jbg Posted October 5, 2007 Report Posted October 5, 2007 That is one way of looking at it. But I look at the divide as something more significant. Born from the reasonable accommodation movement, the ADQ racial mentality will eventually give rise to a progressive counter movement centres itself on both the provincial and even federal charters. You mean yet another party? Quebec needs that as badly as it needs a hole in the head. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
M.Dancer Posted October 5, 2007 Report Posted October 5, 2007 (edited) Louise Harel is the Dan Heap of Quebec politics. She's a Leftist elected in a poor, urban riding. Dan Heap's riding of Spadina is far from a poor urban slum. It has an average HH income above $80,000 and is home to the artsy farties and UofT crowd. While Dan Heap is a scurrilous knave who liked to desecrate the memorials of men who died to keep him free, other than that what is the similarity beween the shameless socialists the separatitsist mentioned? Edited October 5, 2007 by M.Dancer Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.