Fascism returns to Europe

[Canadian Blue]

What's Canadian culture?

I've been from coast to coast, and I've found that every place is just abit different from the next culturally. Even in my town which is for the most part nearly 95% white we are still largely a multicultural community due to the contribution of different ethnic groups over the past century. When I say multicultural I don't mean ghettoization, I mean retaining many of the traditions and customs from your previous home.

Edited October 9, 2007 by Canadian Blue

[M.Dancer]

What's Canadian culture?

Walking through Leaside on Oct 31st, wearing a tri corn hat and drinking a molson in a tall flashing Great Wolf Lodge stien while waiting for your kids to collect jumbo chocolate bars from Colin Mochrie's house.....

[ScottSA]

I present my opponents and rest my case.

[guyser]

Walking through Leaside on Oct 31st, wearing a tri corn hat and drinking a molson in a tall flashing Great Wolf Lodge stien while waiting for your kids to collect jumbo chocolate bars from Colin Mochrie's house.....

Stay off Airdrie.....only the mini bars available. However if your sporting another Molson and can share, hell, they can have the whole damn UNICEF box.

[Canadian Blue]

I present ScottSA and rest my case.

Facial ScottSA, total facial!!!

[ScottSA]

I present ScottSA and rest my case.

Facial ScottSA, total facial!!!

Oh, pardon me, I should have addressed that to Momo. I wasn't talking to you. I didn't even read whatever you wrote.

[Canadian Blue]

I thought you were talking about the entire group, goddamnit Scottyboy you gotta be more precise.

[Jerry Galinda]

S,

But we did bring them here after WW2. Are you saying that it was a bad idea ? We also brought Czech, Austrian, Ukranian, Hungarians who collaborated with the Germans in ww2.

Don't tell me you're against European immigration too ?

For Scott

everything may be "Fascism"

everybody may be a Nazi

it depends of him - because he don't know - what it mean

[Rue]

Allow me to condense your post into a manageable soundbyte. In effect you are claiming that one ought not try to select the characteristics of a potential immigrant. To be sure, you adorn it with all sorts of invective and even a few entirely conjured up imputations, but for the most part you're claiming that it's 'racist' to want to decide who comes into one's country. That's just silly Rue. You of all people should know that.

Actually I never discussed what is or is not suitable immigration policy but now that you ask I would say and excuse me because I am a lawyer and so think like one, that law should be based on objective criteria not subjective criteria.

You want to come up with an Immigration Statute that decides what are desireable characteristics be my guest..can't wait to read it.

Immigration Act of Canada

S.C., 2008, C.666

Preamble

Be it resolved that Canada seeks to

assure that anyone coming to Canada

be the holder of particular characteristics

as defined by ScottUSA including but not

limited to;

a nose of particular width, length

skin colour of consisting of a tone ranging from absolute snow white to

medium pink

no uni-eyebrows

no sloping foreheads

no webbed fingers

no undue facial hair, back hair, leg hair, arm hair

no funny hats

no robes

no jewellery that ressembles thumb tacks in one;s nostril

or more then one ring her hand

no pierced nipplies, scrotums, belly buttons.

Be it also resolved all pesons seeking citizenship

will be required to renounce any or all allegiances to

anything or anyone except the following;

Don Cherry

Brent Butt

Shania Twain

Anne Murray

Celine Dion.

All female applicants are to rename themselves

Anne, Celine or Shania.

All male applicants are to rebame themselves

Don, Brent, or in the alernative Jean, Steve, Gilles or Jack.

[Rue]

Nice twisting on the words. Try to keep up. Rue made some very good points, and can.... and has, shown you how strage your train of thought is. She even points it out in great detail. Cannot see the forest for the trees I guess. I do not agree with Rue on many things, but she has clearly pointed out how you constantly jumble and twist stuff up and then try to pin it on us when we can easily and clearly show you how you are wrong in your thoughts. Or how wrong and contradicting and hypocritical your posting has become. How does one trip over themselves so often?

If you are talking about immigration then fine, but you are also slandering an entire culture and people at the same time. You are the Ann Coulter of this board. "Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslim." Just another great line in many from that crackerhead.

Let me sum up your posts in a manageable soundbyte, .... actually it would just be white noise.

Immigration is not the problem. Muslim immigration is not the problem.

Lol thanks. P.s. I have testacles. I just suck them up cuz Scott likes to pinch them. He's wacky you know.

[MMT]

There are Canadian cities well on the way being culturally transformed by Muslims similar to Brussels.

Muslims in the city I am living in, are becoming 'TO' common of a sight in professional and many other occupations and with the city dotted with Mosques, for a Canadian Muslim population of 650,000.

It will simply be a matter of time before Muslims acquire the tools necessary to make their presence felt in a manner similar to Brussels.

This is the whole problem with multiculturalism, allowing the takeover of a country by foreign cultures with no one to intervene politically.

The only people to blame for this tragic occurrence are the political asses who will sell their soul to the devil in a cheap manoeuvre to buy time, to save the country from potential collapse, a condition caused by hapless politicians initially.

Canadians are to blame also for allowing politicians to get away with the sellout of Canadian jobs to eager third world foreign candidates.

In the year 2025 Muslims will outnumber Christians.

http://muslim-canada.org/muslimstats.html

What would politicians gain from keeping such high rate of muslim immigration? Why not replace muslim immigrants with white Europeans? The government sets the quotes for different nationalities to enter Canada, doesn't it?

[jbg]

What would politicians gain from keeping such high rate of muslim immigration? Why not replace muslim immigrants with white Europeans? The government sets the quotes for different nationalities to enter Canada, doesn't it?

Politicians gain two things:

1. A supply of willing voters; and
   
2. A certain "feeling of goodness" for having "done something" for the world's poor, which they can boast about when hobnobbing with other politicians from other countries.
   

I am becoming more and more convinced that one of the true evils of the United Nations is giving politicians an "alternative forum" to their own people with whom to exercise their herding instincts.

[MMT]

There are Canadian cities well on the way being culturally transformed by Muslims similar to Brussels.

Muslims in the city I am living in, are becoming 'TO' common of a sight in professional and many other occupations and with the city dotted with Mosques, for a Canadian Muslim population of 650,000.

It will simply be a matter of time before Muslims acquire the tools necessary to make their presence felt in a manner similar to Brussels.

This is the whole problem with multiculturalism, allowing the takeover of a country by foreign cultures with no one to intervene politically.

The only people to blame for this tragic occurrence are the political asses who will sell their soul to the devil in a cheap manoeuvre to buy time, to save the country from potential collapse, a condition caused by hapless politicians initially.

Canadians are to blame also for allowing politicians to get away with the sellout of Canadian jobs to eager third world foreign candidates.

In the year 2025 Muslims will outnumber Christians.

http://muslim-canada.org/muslimstats.html

Isn't it the gov't who sets the immigration quotes? What stops it from changing priorities in the immigration policy and start inviting more white Europeans instead of believers in Allah? I thought after Harper "took power" it was already slight change in that policy. Didn't you notice? Or you're saying it's too little and too late?

[Moxie]

Isn't it the gov't who sets the immigration quotes? What stops it from changing priorities in the immigration policy and start inviting more white Europeans instead of believers in Allah? I thought after Harper "took power" it was already slight change in that policy. Didn't you notice? Or you're saying it's too little and too late?

I think it's to late for some Europian Countries, like Belgium. Muslim youth rioting in the streets of Brussels and else where for a week yet the police have made no attempt to arrest and stop the unlawful civil/criminal behavior. Innocent people have been assulted and stabbed yet the police seem to be more concerned with not upsetting the Muslim youth than restoring law and order. Belgium has shown the world that pandering to criminal muslim youths is more important the law an order. Reverse racism and bigotry aimed at native Belgiums so the politicians can get re-elected. Muslims are the swing vote, and it appears pandering and race relations is the only priority of the Belgium goverment. Beatings, rioting, cars being set alight, burning down businesses and stabbings are of no importance, anything is acceptable to get the Muslim vote. It appears to me that if Muslim youth are denied a superior position in society they riot, and this is the future of Eurabia. Deny the minority Muslim population anything they deem Islamic and holy hell shall break loose. Elite Politicians want to lead for a life time, the Muslim vote ensures they have the power for at least twenty more years before Europe because an Islamic State. The left can scoff until the cows come home but the future of Europe is going down the path of an Islamic State. The socialist have distroyed the Europian Culture using Muliticultural Policies, at least Canada can look at Europe as a bad example of what our government should not do.

[Rue]

I think it's to late for some Europian Countries, like Belgium. The socialist have distroyed the Europian Culture using Muliticultural Policies, at least Canada can look at Europe as a bad example of what our government should not do.

So do tell us, how do you define what a Canadian is. Because before you can protect your culture and who you are, wouldn't it be a good idea to know who you are?

Let me give you a hint, there's been considerable difficuly defining the Canadian identity and it continues to be reflected in many constitutional conflicts. Good luck.

Like I said can't wait to read your statute.

You may want to borrow from Quebec. Trois Rivieres set up a code of behaviour and of course the Parti Quebecois wants to solidy what the Quebec Charter of Rights wil define as acceptable Quebec culture.

Apparently they got upset with Muslims who asked for pea soup without pork in it and now the Quebec government muses out loud whether civil servants should wear religious things such as hajib or yamachas (or as they say in Canada, Jewish beenie caps).

Yes the Quebecers can show you the way on this issue. Of course when it comes to asking them just what makes their culture distinct and unique other then language it tends to get quite confused after that. When I have asked Quebecers what makes them unique other then their language or roots to France, I usually get a puzzled look. Sometimes I get references to the kitchen in the front of the house, a fondness for certain foods, but remarkably I don't hear what I would expect to hear (references to music, literature) I get references to being purelains (inbred).

Being a non purelains from Quebec who came to Ontario I would describe Quebec culture with the fact that we Jews taught them how to make a proper bagel and how to smoke brisket properly.

For now the only thing I can think makes Quebec distinct other then language is its steamed hot dogs and square hot dog buns. The maple syrup and smoked beans are niot specific to Quebec. Maybe the pea soup is and meat pies. Other then that I can only think of the Habs, but they have a glorious multi-cultural make up.

To me a real Quebecer must come from Montreal anyways and our cultural contribution to the rest of Canada has always been our sueprior sense of attire and ability to look good in the winter.

[ScottSA]

So do tell us, how do you define what a Canadian is. Because before you can protect your culture and who you are, wouldn't it be a good idea to know who you are?

Let me give you a hint, there's been considerable difficuly defining the Canadian identity and it continues to be reflected in many constitutional conflicts. Good luck.

Like I said can't wait to read your statute.

You may want to borrow from Quebec. Trois Rivieres set up a code of behaviour and of course the Parti Quebecois wants to solidy what the Quebec Charter of Rights wil define as acceptable Quebec culture.

Apparently they got upset with Muslims who asked for pea soup without pork in it and now the Quebec government muses out loud whether civil servants should wear religious things such as hajib or yamachas (or as they say in Canada, Jewish beenie caps).

Yes the Quebecers can show you the way on this issue. Of course when it comes to asking them just what makes their culture distinct and unique other then language it tends to get quite confused after that. When I have asked Quebecers what makes them unique other then their language or roots to France, I usually get a puzzled look. Sometimes I get references to the kitchen in the front of the house, a fondness for certain foods, but remarkably I don't hear what I would expect to hear (references to music, literature) I get references to being purelains (inbred).

Being a non purelains from Quebec who came to Ontario I would describe Quebec culture with the fact that we Jews taught them how to make a proper bagel and how to smoke brisket properly.

For now the only thing I can think makes Quebec distinct other then language is its steamed hot dogs and square hot dog buns. The maple syrup and smoked beans are niot specific to Quebec. Maybe the pea soup is and meat pies. Other then that I can only think of the Habs, but they have a glorious multi-cultural make up.

To me a real Quebecer must come from Montreal anyways and our cultural contribution to the rest of Canada has always been our sueprior sense of attire and ability to look good in the winter.

These long drawn out and snide rants of yours always seem to be against anyone who wants to maintain their traditions and culture, while giving the impression that you're above it all. But somehow you always manage to set yourself up as special, and squeeze in the fact that you're Jewish. Why is that? You also post frequent tomes about how Israel should do exactly the opposite of all other countries.

There is nothing at all wrong with people wanting to live with people who are like them. 50 years ago it was treated as common sense. They don't need a reason, the fact that they prefer it is quite enough. There is no moral imperitive for people in a given society to change for newcomers. Newcomers can take it or leave. And Quebecers also have to learn the same thing about English Canada...they can like it or leave, but Canada shouldn't have to change for them either.

[jbg]

There is no moral imperitive for people in a given society to change for newcomers. Newcomers can take it or leave. And Quebecers also have to learn the same thing about English Canada...they can like it or leave, but Canada shouldn't have to change for them either.

I'll repeat my response to another post in another thread since I think it answers the question:

I wonder if it was her headscarf that was causing her to drive badly the day before the accident?

And I wonder from this debate why it's necessary for immigrants and their immediate descendants to dress in costumes when about in society? If they came here didn't they come because they wanted what we have here?

Or maybe, only the benefits.

[jefferiah]

This is where I strongly disagree with you. In my critical analysis of organized religions, I find Christianity and for that matter all organized religions have been barbaric. I do not think it is particular to Islam. Its kind of ironic saying to a Jew whose people have been subject to Christian barbarism for over 2000 years that Christianity is less barbaric then Islam.

But you are analyzing the barbarism committed by men who were Christians rather than the religion itself. Nowhere does the New Testament promote barbarism against Jews. In fact it was written by Jews, and Paul himself said that the Jews are still the chosen and that gentile Christians were being grafted into onto to the family tree of Israel.

We all know that there were horrible acts committed in the name of Christianity, but they had to have been independent of its scripture. Scott rightly points out that the Koran gives praise to conquest and mentions Christians and Jews as the enemies of Islam.

Edited October 27, 2007 by jefferiah

[Moxie]

Rue wrote: Being a non purelains from Quebec who came to Ontario I would describe Quebec culture with the fact that we Jews taught them how to make a proper bagel and how to smoke brisket properly.

Well if that's your claim to fame I feel really bad for you. Bagals are the most god awful food creation seconded only to NFL's potted meat. Even NFLanders don't know what potted meat is. Rue I don't have to explain Canadian Culture to you or the other cult members of the Multicult brigade. Canada is made up of many cultures starting with our ties to the Native Communities, our early immigrants from England, Scotland and Ireland, the former USSR, China etc. One thing we all had in common was our family values, christianity and a culture that has grown to embrace what makes us different and what links us as a society. You seem to think, like most multicult followers, that culture is made up of FOOD. Nope our culture isn't that shallow, it's our history and our roots and shared cultures that have merged together and formed Canadian Culture. It's truely pityful that some Canadians seem to think culture is based on food and spices, if that were the case Indian food would be outlawed. That stuff sticks something fierce, and taste awful. But Canadians are accepting of other cultures, we enjoy experiencing new foods and spices but it certainly doesn't define a culture. Feel free to embrace the Islamist Culture, hell will freeze over before I'll allow Sharia Law in Canada.

JBG, lol it doesn't make much sense to be running around in full desert gala of flowing robes in the middle of a Canadian winter but hey it's Canada we do tolerate more than most countries would.

Another example of Muslim intigration, not. This isn't an isolated case, but a series of many attacks on EU doctors by Muslims trying to enforce seven century Sharia Law. Sniff, what is it about this culture that's worth embracing might I ask? I see nothing worthy of embracing and adding to Canadian Culture. NOTHING.

Another example of how far the Islamist will go to enforce Sharia Law on a secular government: http://www.flandersnews.be/cm/flandersnews...s/071026_muslim

[jbg]

JBG, lol it doesn't make much sense to be running around in full desert gala of flowing robes in the middle of a Canadian winter but hey it's Canada we do tolerate more than most countries would.

Then why, almost alone among immigrants, do they insist on setting themselves apart in a harmful, antognistic manner? (Chinese may stay apart but don't aim to antagonize and demand).

[ScottSA]

Then why, almost alone among immigrants, do they insist on setting themselves apart in a harmful, antognistic manner? (Chinese may stay apart but don't aim to antagonize and demand).

Partly because we encourage them to do so, but mostly because there are a critical mass of them, which allows them to do so.

[Jerry Galinda]

I think it's to late for some Europian Countries, like Belgium. Muslim youth rioting in the streets of Brussels and else where for a week yet the police have made no attempt to arrest and stop the unlawful civil/criminal behavior. Innocent people have been assulted and stabbed yet the police seem to be more concerned with not upsetting the Muslim youth than restoring law and order. Belgium has shown the world that pandering to criminal muslim youths is more important the law an order. Reverse racism and bigotry aimed at native Belgiums so the politicians can get re-elected. Muslims are the swing vote, and it appears pandering and race relations is the only priority of the Belgium goverment. Beatings, rioting, cars being set alight, burning down businesses and stabbings are of no importance, anything is acceptable to get the Muslim vote. It appears to me that if Muslim youth are denied a superior position in society they riot, and this is the future of Eurabia. Deny the minority Muslim population anything they deem Islamic and holy hell shall break loose. Elite Politicians want to lead for a life time, the Muslim vote ensures they have the power for at least twenty more years before Europe because an Islamic State. The left can scoff until the cows come home but the future of Europe is going down the path of an Islamic State. The socialist have distroyed the Europian Culture using Muliticultural Policies, at least Canada can look at Europe as a bad example of what our government should not do.

From what I see - the most important problem for Us is - to “save“ and safe - the European culture and Christianity - because of immigrants , especially Muslims and so on.

Is it possible ?

I have doubts.

Probably it’s inevitable historical process.

[jbg]

From what I see - the most important problem for Us is - to “save“ and safe - the European culture and Christianity - because of immigrants , especially Muslims and so on.

Is it possible ?

I have doubts.

Probably it’s inevitable historical process.

Once people give up it's always too late, unless they regain their willingness to fight for something worth preserving. Letting the barbarians run things is political correctness run amok, not an "inevitable historical process".

[Moxie]

It's not political correctness anymore, the far left have shown their true colors. They are hard core facist, they want to silence any voice that doesn't parrot their socialist idiology. The use words like racist, bigot, hater blah blah blah. One only needs to look at our universitys to see how far the facist left have come, we are mad to allow this movement to continue spreading their "Facist Hatred", in the name of tolerance of course, in our taxpayers' funded universities. If universities are spreading Marxism on our dime, let the loony left start their own universities. Just once let them dig into their facists pockets and pay to spread their special brand of hatred.

This video is spot on, the left worship barbaric dictators and hail facism as being superior to "Democracy", they are deluded. Koolaide isn't their beverage of choice anymore "Moonbat Hatred Juice" is their new favorite.

Video:

(the headlines come up before the video does)

[Jerry Galinda]

Once people give up it's always too late, unless they regain their willingness to fight for something worth preserving. Letting the barbarians run things is political correctness run amok, not an "inevitable historical process".

"to fight for something worth preserving" -- How ?

by building a new Wall - between Europeans and new "barbarians" ?

by controlling them , by controlling immigration ?

Europe is old - in many meanings of the word - that's all.

It's the Main PROBLEM !