xul Posted July 22, 2007 Report Posted July 22, 2007 (edited) I must be very dull. "This land is not belong to them but to us. Our ancestors lived in here thousands years ago. We were conquered and dispeled from our homeland and now we have been just coming back home. We are master not guest. They are guest. We will no longer give up and abandon her." I guess those are the words that jefferiah wanted Mike told me. I can understand the emotional feeling in those words. But this is a declaration not a solution. I wish both of those Israeli girls and Arabian girls and their future girls and boys would live in the circumstance that my son and sons or girls of every pro-Israeli or pro-Arabian Canadian live now. Should we redefine the term civilized people as that "civilized people kills using tanks and uncivilized people kills using swords"? edited for: I was confused about the term of "civilized people". Edited July 24, 2007 by xul Quote
Harry Nads Posted July 26, 2007 Report Posted July 26, 2007 (edited) 1) The GST cut. 2) Supporting Israel. You're a disgrace to your country. You pledge allegiance to Israel instead of the country you live in and you even have the audacity to say Israel is the greatest country to live in. People like you shouldn't be allowed to vote. I don't agree with Harper much either and I also support the invasion of Afghanistan and I can't say that I don't disagree with his stance on Israel too much, but I'm looking out for Canada's best interests, unlike you. Many people in the U.S. government suffer from the same disgusting problem. The difference between them and you is that they abuse their power to help another country while knowing that the country they live in does not benefit one bit. Quite simply, you're a traitor. Edited July 26, 2007 by Harry Nads Quote
ScottSA Posted July 26, 2007 Report Posted July 26, 2007 1) The GST cut. 2) Supporting Israel. You're a disgrace to your country. You pledge allegiance to Israel instead of the country you live in and you even have the audacity to say Israel is the greatest country to live in. People like you shouldn't be allowed to vote. I don't agree with Harper much either and I also support the invasion of Afghanistan and I can't say that I don't disagree with his stance on Israel too much, but I'm looking out for Canada's best interests, unlike you. Many people in the U.S. government suffer from the same disgusting problem. The difference between them and you is that they abuse their power to help another country while knowing that the country they live in does not benefit one bit. Quite simply, you're a traitor. Better that, I suspect, than harry bollacks, but that's just me. It's great to have someone who I suspect is an undergrad who just discovered the realist paradigm in international studies join the forum, but must you come in as Sgt. Fury announcing his amazing Real Politic? Canada is allied with Israel for reasons that will benefit canada very much in the long run. Realism doesn't demand that one see immediate and obvious return from every action. Quote
mikedavid00 Posted July 26, 2007 Author Report Posted July 26, 2007 1) The GST cut. 2) Supporting Israel. You're a disgrace to your country. Quite simply, you're a traitor. I said Isreal is the greatest place on earth as in "He fills our praise Thou art Holy, who inhabits the praises of Israel - Ps 22:3.:. " Same how like a muslim would say Mecca is the greatest place on earth. Of course, it's wrong when I say it, but of course, it's more than fine when the Muslims say it. But let me ask you a question. How do you feel about our immigration policy. You're new here calling me a tratier and such. So why don't you tell me how you feel about the 800,000 people who are waiting to come here. I'm waiting. Quote ---- Charles Anthony banned me for 30 days on April 28 for 'obnoxious libel' when I suggested Jack Layton took part in illegal activities in a message parlor. Claiming a politician took part in illegal activity is not rightful cause for banning and is what is discussed here almost daily in one capacity or another. This was really a brownshirt style censorship from a moderator on mapleleafweb http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1oGB-BKdZg---
Melanie_ Posted July 26, 2007 Report Posted July 26, 2007 (edited) Deleted. It wasn't very nice. Edited July 26, 2007 by Melanie_ Quote For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela
Bonam Posted July 26, 2007 Report Posted July 26, 2007 Lol a traitor for supporting a prime minister that isn't shy about supporting Canada's allies in their struggle against terror. That's a funny one. Quote
geoffrey Posted August 1, 2007 Report Posted August 1, 2007 But you gotta ask the question; why do we allow this? Of all the jobs I ever worked, I've only a few times ever worked with a Chinese person ever. I wonder much of the time where they actually work or what they do to make ends meet. I certainly don't run into them much. You've obviously not lived in Vancouver or even Calgary. Or perhaps minorities people avoid you because you are wholeheartedly bigotted towards anyone of colour. I've worked with a few chinese people. You see lots of Chinese folks in engineering and finance. Seems like their culture gives them a bit of an advantage in math sort of things?? But let me ask you a question. How do you feel about our immigration policy. You're new here calling me a tratier and such. So why don't you tell me how you feel about the 800,000 people who are waiting to come here. I feel encouraged by it... maybe they'll fill in the 150,000 jobs that will be empty in Alberta because Canadians are too lazy to work. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
jbg Posted August 11, 2007 Report Posted August 11, 2007 I support Israel's right to exist, but this video and your support of it is sick. What did the Palestinian girl do to the Israeli girl? Probably nothing, but she deserved to get attacked? Where are your morals?Hate breeds Hate - End the cycle. Edit: What is "unplolurar"? lol The truth is that video was impossible to follow, and not a very good video. That being said, it's sort of like a man bites dog story. No one supports a man sinking his teeth into a dog, but it is newsworthy. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Rue Posted August 12, 2007 Report Posted August 12, 2007 When I heard that I wondered how it would be received. Apparently when brave Flora McDonald dressed the Bonnie Prince Charles in woman's clothes to escape from the English, no one though him less manly..... Are you suggesting Prince Charles was a terrorist who used his religious status to incite terror in his followers? Prince Charles was a pathetic weak despot fleeing for his life but to suggest he was engaging in the same morally equivalent act is just not true. Prince Charles crime was his birth status, not his telling people to engage in terror. 1) Charles Stuart did indeed strike terror...and his army sacking a few English towns would be considered a terrorist act by today's standard.... 2) Had Charles Stuart renounced Rome his claim to the throne would have had much more strength...certainly more than German George. The idea of a catholic king certainly terrorized the English, who remembered the persecutions of Bloody Mary. 3) Charles Stuart never had a chance to be a despot. He lived by the hospitality of the King of France. I'm not suggesting any moral equivalency between bonnie prince Charles and the Pakistani mullah. I am suggesting situational equivalency, both fled in woman's clothing. And I imagine the followers of the Mullah feel the same about it as they did in 1749 You made some excellent points. I appreciate your distinguishing situational from moral equivalency and your historic accuracy and defer to your points. Well said. Quote
JB Globe Posted August 14, 2007 Report Posted August 14, 2007 Your racist and xenophobic hatred of religious and ethnic backgrounds different from your own is well-documented on this site. Why then the love of Israel? Especially considering the fact that a white-nationalist such as yourself would be attacking Jews in Toronto if this were 1930 . . . It's simple - Israel went to war with a lot of Muslim nations in 1967, and continues to use it's military against Muslims today. And for Mr. David, that's enough - he despises Muslims so much, he's willing to become a lapdog of Israel based on that alone. Quote
jbg Posted August 15, 2007 Report Posted August 15, 2007 (edited) Your racist and xenophobic hatred of religious and ethnic backgrounds different from your own is well-documented on this site.Show me one racist or xenophobic post of Rue's. And please go to www.m-w.com for a definition of those terms.Why then the love of Israel? Especially considering the fact that a white-nationalist such as yourself would be attacking Jews in Toronto if this were 1930 . . .Have you met Rue?It's simple - Israel went to war with a lot of Muslim nations in 1967, and continues to use it's military against Muslims today.And Israel's self-defense was unprovoked?And for Mr. David, that's enough - he despises Muslims so much, he's willing to become a lapdog of Israel based on that alone.Who? Edited August 16, 2007 by jbg Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Bonam Posted August 15, 2007 Report Posted August 15, 2007 I believe that JB Globe was referring to mikedavid00 in his post, not to Rue. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.