Keepitsimple Posted June 18, 2007 Report Posted June 18, 2007 Interesting article in the Sun. Here's a snippet but please read the whole article: Link: http://www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/...pf-4267364.html The question is: while the federal government of Stephen Harper is defending Ontario, where do Ontario Liberals MPs stand? Let's rewind the tape of this political soap opera and go back two years. It was the former Liberal government of Paul Martin which, for electoral purposes, gave in to the demands of Newfoundland and Nova Scotia at the expense of Ontario. Ontario Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty complained to the then Liberal government in Ottawa that Ontario could not sustain the financial burden of the "equalization formula." McGuinty said that the burden on the shoulder of Ontario taxpayers was $22 billion every year. 'NO IMBALANCE' And it was the present Liberal leader, Stephane Dion, who rebuked McGuinty, saying that there was no "fiscal imbalance." What did the more than 70 Liberal MPs do to help McGuinty? Did anyone threaten Martin with voting against the Liberal budget, like one Conservative colleague is doing in Nova Scotia? Nope. And what are these Libeal MPs doing now that their new leader is siding with the Atlantic premiers, ignoring, again, the rights of Ontario the taxpayers? Quote Back to Basics
Canuck E Stan Posted June 18, 2007 Report Posted June 18, 2007 Ontario will have to make some choices in the next election and the Liberal MP's will have to tell Ontarians how their party really stands on this issue. Look for a Conservative majority in the next election. "Hands in your pocket" is the easiest way to make a voter decide which way to vote. Quote "Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains." — Winston Churchill
Michael Bluth Posted June 18, 2007 Report Posted June 18, 2007 Ontario will have to make some choices in the next election and the Liberal MP's will have to tell Ontarians how their party really stands on this issue.Look for a Conservative majority in the next election. "Hands in your pocket" is the easiest way to make a voter decide which way to vote. I wouldn't put it past the Conservatives to come up with a similar type jingle. They have proven they aren't afraid of cheezy in their ads *beep* *beep* and proved that cheezy can work. Quote No one has ever defeated the Liberals with a divided conservative family. - Hon. Jim Prentice
Argus Posted June 18, 2007 Report Posted June 18, 2007 Premier Dalton McGuinty waded into the fracas over the federal budget yesterday, warning that Ontario won't tolerate any further steps to shield resource-rich provinces from equalization clawbacks. McGuinty weighs in on Atlantic Accord "I know that Prime Minister Harper has made a deliberate effort to bring a principle-based approach to dealing with equalization and federal transfers to provinces and territories. I support that concept. We are very much in agreement with that kind of approach and I hope that he continues to be informed by principles rather than politics as he enters into this newest round of discussions." McGuinty talks tough on equalization Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Who's Doing What? Posted June 18, 2007 Report Posted June 18, 2007 So who gets more Ontario(and Alberta) money? Atlantic Canada? Or Quebec? Quote Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html "You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)
Mad_Michael Posted June 18, 2007 Report Posted June 18, 2007 So who gets more Ontario(and Alberta) money?Atlantic Canada? Or Quebec? Quebec is by far the largest recipient of equalisation payments in Canada - in gross dollars. Newfoundland is the largest recipient of equalisation payments in Canada - per capita. I believe all of the Maritimes exceed Quebec (but below NFLD) in the per capita receipt of equalisation payments, though I don't have any data available at hand. I'm sure it can all be found pretty easily since I've seen data tables on this topic dozens of times. Quote
madmax Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 Premier Dalton McGuinty waded into the fracas over the federal budget yesterday, warning that Ontario won't tolerate any further steps to shield resource-rich provinces from equalization clawbacks.McGuinty weighs in on Atlantic Accord "I know that Prime Minister Harper has made a deliberate effort to bring a principle-based approach to dealing with equalization and federal transfers to provinces and territories. I support that concept. We are very much in agreement with that kind of approach and I hope that he continues to be informed by principles rather than politics as he enters into this newest round of discussions." McGuinty talks tough on equalization I really don't know how much I could put into anything McGuinty Says. Changes with the wind, and his promises are never fullfilled. When he stands up to defend something, it is for his political benefit, not a Provincial Benefit. Perhaps that is why I don't trust a word out of his mouth, and you would be wise not to either. Quote
Mad_Michael Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 Premier Dalton McGuinty waded into the fracas over the federal budget yesterday, warning that Ontario won't tolerate any further steps to shield resource-rich provinces from equalization clawbacks. McGuinty weighs in on Atlantic Accord "I know that Prime Minister Harper has made a deliberate effort to bring a principle-based approach to dealing with equalization and federal transfers to provinces and territories. I support that concept. We are very much in agreement with that kind of approach and I hope that he continues to be informed by principles rather than politics as he enters into this newest round of discussions." McGuinty talks tough on equalization I really don't know how much I could put into anything McGuinty Says. Changes with the wind, and his promises are never fullfilled. When he stands up to defend something, it is for his political benefit, not a Provincial Benefit. Perhaps that is why I don't trust a word out of his mouth, and you would be wise not to either. Indeed. And especially true now that Dalton is on the campaign trail. Nothing any politician says during a campaign can be taken at face value. Everything must be assumed to be 'spin' until proven otherwise. Quote
NovaScotian Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 So who gets more Ontario(and Alberta) money? Atlantic Canada? Or Quebec? Quebec is by far the largest recipient of equalisation payments in Canada - in gross dollars. Newfoundland is the largest recipient of equalisation payments in Canada - per capita. I believe all of the Maritimes exceed Quebec (but below NFLD) in the per capita receipt of equalisation payments, though I don't have any data available at hand. I'm sure it can all be found pretty easily since I've seen data tables on this topic dozens of times. I can make an estimate based on the 2008-09 estimated equalization payments and estimated population. Prince Edward Island.......$2230 New Brunswick..................$1930 Manitoba.............................$1670 Nova Scotia........................$1380 Quebec.................................$986 Newfoundland.....................$390 Quote
Mad_Michael Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 I can make an estimate based on the 2008-09 estimated equalization payments and estimated population.Prince Edward Island.......$2230 New Brunswick..................$1930 Manitoba.............................$1670 Nova Scotia........................$1380 Quebec.................................$986 Newfoundland.....................$390 Unless you cite a source, your data is meaningless. Here's some data for 2003/04 In 2003-2004, the federal government made equalization payments of $8.69 billion to the provinces. Seven provinces qualified for equalization that year – Quebec, Manitoba, British Columbia and the four Atlantic provinces. Of the seven provinces that qualified for equalization in 2003-2004, Quebec received the largest total amount – approximately $3.8 billion. However, this was due entirely to its population size relative to that of other equalization-receiving provinces. On a per capita basis, Prince Edward Island was the largest recipient, at about $1,689 per person. The smallest was British Columbia, at $77 per person. Source If you know the various Provincial populations, the subsidy per capita rate can be calculated. As for PEI being the largest per capita recipient of Alberta & Ontario taxpayers, that is pathetic. PEI already has 4 Federal Senators, its own Provincial Legislature and several MP's. All for a place that has less population than the riding I live in where we have 1 MPP and 1 MP (and no free money from anyone). Subsidies breed dependencies. That's what subsidies do. They are not good for anyone. Quote
NovaScotian Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 I can make an estimate based on the 2008-09 estimated equalization payments and estimated population. Prince Edward Island.......$2230 New Brunswick..................$1930 Manitoba.............................$1670 Nova Scotia........................$1380 Quebec.................................$986 Newfoundland.....................$390 Unless you cite a source, your data is meaningless. Opps, very true. Equalization http://www.fin.gc.ca/FEDPROV/eqpe.html And population estimate in 2008-09, medium projection. http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/91-5...591-520-XIE.pdf Quote
Leafless Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 As for PEI being the largest per capita recipient of Alberta & Ontario taxpayers, that is pathetic. PEI already has 4 Federal Senators, its own Provincial Legislature and several MP's. All for a place that has less population than the riding I live in where we have 1 MPP and 1 MP (and no free money from anyone). Subsidies breed dependencies. That's what subsidies do. They are not good for anyone. Agreed. But you overlooked one important point. The money the fed's give the provinces is not Ontario money or Alberta money. Ontario for instance has 38% of the population and pays 42% of federal taxes, the extra 4% because we have more high earning individuals and corporations here. The emphasis is totally on the federal government and how it spends our tax dollars. Equalization is breaking Canada whereas that tax money could be spent in different badly needed areas. Currently Atlantic Canada is in the process of ripping off the federal government and Quebec is treated like a kingdom. The federal government must draw the line somewhere and a good place is the equalization program. Subsidies breed dependencies. Quote
NovaScotian Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 Agreed. But you overlooked one important point. The money the fed's give the provinces is not Ontario money or Alberta money. Ontario for instance has 38% of the population and pays 42% of federal taxes, the extra 4% because we have more high earning individuals and corporations here. The emphasis is totally on the federal government and how it spends our tax dollars. Equalization is breaking Canada whereas that tax money could be spent in different badly needed areas. Currently Atlantic Canada is in the process of ripping off the federal government and Quebec is treated like a kingdom. The federal government must draw the line somewhere and a good place is the equalization program. Subsidies breed dependencies. "Currently Atlantic Canada is in the process of ripping off the federal government" Right.......Did the Government of Canada sign an agreement that said that Newfoundland and Nova Scotia could keep 100% of its oil and gas revenues until 2012-13, no matter what equalization formula is in place??? Does our governments signature mean nothing? Anyway, this is not going to be a popular opinion and I won't be well liked after a say it, but... I hate to break up this whole Ontario pity party and yes, equalization as flaws, but I am suppose to believe Ontario, home of the national capital and its legions of highly payed bureaucrats + location of most national headquarters, huge infrastructure expenditures & investments, massive federal R&D investments, Canada's banking & financial capital, Canada's Keynesian planned manufacturing sector, not to mention the fact that Ontario has a huge influence on federal policy.....is a huge some big loser/victim in this confederation? And if you are so convinced that subsidies are the terrible, I *kindly* suggest you petition the provincial government to end the $2.8 billion in annual subsidies to Ontario related interests, not even including provincial and federal subsidies to agriculture and manufacturing ...because as you know.... subsidies breed dependencies. That's what subsidies do. They are not good for anyone. Quote
Michael Bluth Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 Right.......Did the Government of Canada sign an agreement that said that Newfoundland and Nova Scotia could keep 100% of its oil and gas revenues until 2012-13, no matter what equalization formula is in place??? Does our governments signature mean nothing? The governmen tof Paul Martin signed the Atlantic Accord. They lost the succeeding election. Was that a contributing factor? I hate to break up this whole Ontario pity party and yes, equalization as flaws, but I am suppose to believe Ontario, home of the national capital and its legions of highly payed bureaucrats + location of most national headquarters, huge infrastructure expenditures & investments, massive federal R&D investments, Canada's banking & financial capital, Canada's Keynesian planned manufacturing sector, not to mention the fact that Ontario has a huge influence on federal policy.....is a huge some big loser/victim in this confederation? Agreed that Ontario has enjoyed huge infrastructure investments. However, Rodney MacDonald is not acting in the best interest of Nova Scotians at this point. He is trying to make political gains rather than sitting down with Jim Flaherty to negotiate a deal that works for everybody. Quote No one has ever defeated the Liberals with a divided conservative family. - Hon. Jim Prentice
August1991 Posted June 20, 2007 Report Posted June 20, 2007 John Crosbie sets the record straight. Ontario may not have received federal equalization funds but it has benefitted hugely over the years through a variety of industrial programmes such as the auto-pact and Candu. (Ontario is the only province in Canada with any sizeable auto industry or nuclear stations.) Newfoundland lawyer John Crosbie, who is a former finance minister under Brian Mulroney, said the Harper government was breaching the Atlantic Accord with the 2007 budget by unilaterally altering the accord without the consent of Newfoundland or Nova Scotia. Echoing MacDonald's presentation, Crosbie said the federal government is deliberately confusing the public and media by linking the accord with equalization payments."It's very discouraging that it gets mixed up with equalization ... we are not trying to have our cake and eat it too. We haven't had the frigging cake yet. Let's have the cake first and this is all we want. We are having our cake removed," said Crosbie. He said the accord is actually an economic development program which the finance department's website acknowledges, and is comparable to Ontario's various autopact programs to assist the automobile industry in that province. Canwest Quote
runningdog Posted June 20, 2007 Report Posted June 20, 2007 Agreed. But you overlooked one important point. The money the fed's give the provinces is not Ontario money or Alberta money. Ontario for instance has 38% of the population and pays 42% of federal taxes, the extra 4% because we have more high earning individuals and corporations here. The emphasis is totally on the federal government and how it spends our tax dollars. Equalization is breaking Canada whereas that tax money could be spent in different badly needed areas. Currently Atlantic Canada is in the process of ripping off the federal government and Quebec is treated like a kingdom. The federal government must draw the line somewhere and a good place is the equalization program. Subsidies breed dependencies. "Currently Atlantic Canada is in the process of ripping off the federal government" Right.......Did the Government of Canada sign an agreement that said that Newfoundland and Nova Scotia could keep 100% of its oil and gas revenues until 2012-13, no matter what equalization formula is in place??? Does our governments signature mean nothing? Anyway, this is not going to be a popular opinion and I won't be well liked after a say it, but... I hate to break up this whole Ontario pity party and yes, equalization as flaws, but I am suppose to believe Ontario, home of the national capital and its legions of highly payed bureaucrats + location of most national headquarters, huge infrastructure expenditures & investments, massive federal R&D investments, Canada's banking & financial capital, Canada's Keynesian planned manufacturing sector, not to mention the fact that Ontario has a huge influence on federal policy.....is a huge some big loser/victim in this confederation? And if you are so convinced that subsidies are the terrible, I *kindly* suggest you petition the provincial government to end the $2.8 billion in annual subsidies to Ontario related interests, not even including provincial and federal subsidies to agriculture and manufacturing ...because as you know.... subsidies breed dependencies. That's what subsidies do. They are not good for anyone. well said. Quote
Leafless Posted June 20, 2007 Report Posted June 20, 2007 I hate to break up this whole Ontario pity party and yes, equalization as flaws, but I am suppose to believe Ontario, home of the national capital and its legions of highly payed bureaucrats + location of most national headquarters, huge infrastructure expenditures & investments, massive federal R&D investments, Canada's banking & financial capital, Canada's Keynesian planned manufacturing sector, not to mention the fact that Ontario has a huge influence on federal policy.....is a huge some big loser/victim in this confederation?And if you are so convinced that subsidies are the terrible, I *kindly* suggest you petition the provincial government to end the $2.8 billion in annual subsidies to Ontario related interests, not even including provincial and federal subsidies to agriculture and manufacturing ...because as you know.... subsidies breed dependencies. That's what subsidies do. They are not good for anyone. You sound like you have a high level of contempt for Ontario, so why don't you try uprooting yourself and move to where the action is or where the good life is, according to you. BTW- Manufacturing subsidies are not in the same category as equalization. For instance the Fed's subsidize the auto industry in Ontario and automobiles shipped across Canada create JOBS in all provinces including Nova Scotia. Quote
jbg Posted June 23, 2007 Report Posted June 23, 2007 Ontario will have to make some choices in the next election and the Liberal MP's will have to tell Ontarians how their party really stands on this issue.Look for a Conservative majority in the next election. "Hands in your pocket" is the easiest way to make a voter decide which way to vote. If Ontario votes Liberal again, they'll get what they deserve; giveaways of their provinces' wealth. I know the CPC has been doing a bit of that, but nothing like what Dion would do. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.