M.Dancer Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 oops Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
kuzadd Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 Clearly, you know nothing of Rwanda. What helped Rwanda be the slaughter it was, was the peacekeepers. The only thing keeping the guerilla warfare going is the illegal invasion and occupation. Clearly you know nothing, period. Try reading about Dallaire experiances and how with so few peacekeepers they were powerless to protect anyone. PS, there is very little guerilla warfare in iraq. 90% of the violence is sectarian terrorism directed against iraqis by iraqis. This would escalate grossly if the coalition left. Maybe that's what you would like then? I am afraid, I know a great deal more then you. In fact, I am certain of it, as I read your postings. Dig deep into Rwandan history, it won't take that much effort, try it. You will be very, very surprised about General Dallaire's "role" in the genocide, and the roll of other countries. BTW: I have read his book. also. and I am still standing by my previous statments "What helped Rwanda be the slaughter it was, was the peacekeepers." "The only thing keeping the guerilla warfare going is the illegal invasion and occupation." Quote Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).
M.Dancer Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 I am afraid, I know a great deal more then you. In fact, I am certain of it, as I read your postings.Dig deep into Rwandan history, it won't take that much effort, try it. You will be very, very surprised about General Dallaire's "role" in the genocide, and the roll of other countries. BTW: I have read his book. also. and I am still standing by my previous statments "What helped Rwanda be the slaughter it was, was the peacekeepers." "The only thing keeping the guerilla warfare going is the illegal invasion and occupation." You stand by tyour statements but you are unarmed...merely mumbling and offering not a scintilla of fact. You are like one of those crack pot tin foil conspiracy theorists who offer a theory with out evidence except backed up by the jejune claim that you have some secret knowledge. This despite that, actually, your opinions are false. You say the Peacekeepers halped the slaughter, prove it. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
kuzadd Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 I am afraid, I know a great deal more then you. In fact, I am certain of it, as I read your postings. Dig deep into Rwandan history, it won't take that much effort, try it. You will be very, very surprised about General Dallaire's "role" in the genocide, and the roll of other countries. BTW: I have read his book. also. and I am still standing by my previous statments "What helped Rwanda be the slaughter it was, was the peacekeepers." "The only thing keeping the guerilla warfare going is the illegal invasion and occupation." You stand by tyour statements but you are unarmed...merely mumbling and offering not a scintilla of fact. You are like one of those crack pot tin foil conspiracy theorists who offer a theory with out evidence except backed up by the jejune claim that you have some secret knowledge. This despite that, actually, your opinions are false. You say the Peacekeepers halped the slaughter, prove it. do your own homework, I can't help the blind see, they must help themselves, comprende? btw:"Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent " as you so aptly demonstrate. Like I said, do some research. Quote Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).
M.Dancer Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 do your own homework, I can't help the blind see, they must help themselves, comprende?Like I said, do some research. RESEARCH YOUR POST If you are stating a fact, be prepared to back it up with some official sources (websites, links etc). It is also important to structure your post in a way that everyone can understand. That means writing complete sentences and paragraphs with the appropriate grammar. If for some reason, you enjoy writing long confusing sentences and paragraphs riddled with poor grammar and spelling mistakes, your post, and therefore your opinions, will likely be discarded. Therefore, it is in your best interest to make sure that your post includes sufficient sources and contains a well-researched and well-organized argument. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/index.p...&CODE=01&HID=17 I figured as much. Hot Air and little else...... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
kuzadd Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 do your own homework, I can't help the blind see, they must help themselves, comprende? Like I said, do some research. RESEARCH YOUR POST If you are stating a fact, be prepared to back it up with some official sources (websites, links etc). It is also important to structure your post in a way that everyone can understand. That means writing complete sentences and paragraphs with the appropriate grammar. If for some reason, you enjoy writing long confusing sentences and paragraphs riddled with poor grammar and spelling mistakes, your post, and therefore your opinions, will likely be discarded. Therefore, it is in your best interest to make sure that your post includes sufficient sources and contains a well-researched and well-organized argument. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/index.p...&CODE=01&HID=17 I figured as much. Hot Air and little else...... au contraire , I extoll you to do your own research for yoruself, for your own benefit, not mine. Also I refuse to get into a pointless debate with someone like yourself. I tell you the information is out there, check out human rights researchers/organizations, etc., Also the African press may be helpful to you. also read up on Paul Kagame, even know who he is? know where he trained? by who? Fort Leavenworth, Kansas- by the US military? why would the US train a Ugandan in the US, to lead a rebel army, against Rwanda. when the peacekeepers were present? why did Romeo Dallaire ensure the elected Rwandan leader had to deal with Paul Kagame the terrorist backed by the US military.??( by legitimizing his "rebel" army) interesting little tale about an airport..... do your homework, buddy boy. cause the only poster exuding hot air, is yourself btw: this is way off topic. Quote Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).
M.Dancer Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 do your own homework, I can't help the blind see, they must help themselves, comprende? Like I said, do some research. RESEARCH YOUR POST If you are stating a fact, be prepared to back it up with some official sources (websites, links etc). It is also important to structure your post in a way that everyone can understand. That means writing complete sentences and paragraphs with the appropriate grammar. If for some reason, you enjoy writing long confusing sentences and paragraphs riddled with poor grammar and spelling mistakes, your post, and therefore your opinions, will likely be discarded. Therefore, it is in your best interest to make sure that your post includes sufficient sources and contains a well-researched and well-organized argument. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/index.p...&CODE=01&HID=17 I figured as much. Hot Air and little else...... au contraire , I extoll you to do your own research for yoruself, for your own benefit, not mine. Also I refuse to get into a pointless debate with someone like yourself. Of course you do, and for good reason too. Because if you state a fact and can't back it up, it generally means the back up doesn't exist. I know that, you know that, and everyone who reads this thread knows that. I think we can move along here, absolutely nothing to see....... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
kuzadd Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 do your own homework, I can't help the blind see, they must help themselves, comprende? Like I said, do some research. RESEARCH YOUR POST If you are stating a fact, be prepared to back it up with some official sources (websites, links etc). It is also important to structure your post in a way that everyone can understand. That means writing complete sentences and paragraphs with the appropriate grammar. If for some reason, you enjoy writing long confusing sentences and paragraphs riddled with poor grammar and spelling mistakes, your post, and therefore your opinions, will likely be discarded. Therefore, it is in your best interest to make sure that your post includes sufficient sources and contains a well-researched and well-organized argument. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/index.p...&CODE=01&HID=17 I figured as much. Hot Air and little else...... au contraire , I extoll you to do your own research for yoruself, for your own benefit, not mine. Also I refuse to get into a pointless debate with someone like yourself. Of course you do, and for good reason too. Because if you state a fact and can't back it up, it generally means the back up doesn't exist. I know that, you know that, and everyone who reads this thread knows that. I think we can move along here, absolutely nothing to see....... Of course, there isn't for you. despite numerous leads I gave you? I can't babysit you and refuse to babysit you. The immature will stay immature if they continue to be babysat. Interesting in your quote ,you leave everything out, I posted to get you started on your learning experience. very interesting..... here it is again, now get started, or you are acknowledging you know nothing.? and don't want to know anything, outside of your extremely rigid box? maybe your afraid.? " tell you the information is out there, check out human rights researchers/organizations, etc., Also the African press may be helpful to you. also read up on Paul Kagame, even know who he is? know where he trained? by who? Fort Leavenworth, Kansas- by the US military? why would the US train a Ugandan in the US, to lead a rebel army, against Rwanda. when the peacekeepers were present? why did Romeo Dallaire ensure the elected Rwandan leader had to deal with Paul Kagame the terrorist backed by the US military.??( by legitimizing his "rebel" army) interesting little tale about an airport....." have fun, help yourself, learn, don't waste my time, with your nonsense. Quote Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).
M.Dancer Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 Lets get this straight, it's up to you to prove your facts, I don't have to do anything. Amd so far you have proved that you are full of it. ....move along now Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
kuzadd Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 Lets get this straight, it's up to you to prove your facts, I don't have to do anything. Amd so far you have proved that you are full of it.....move along now BTW: You haven't PROVEN your claim on this forum re: " 90% of the violence is sectarian terrorism directed against iraqis by iraqis. " Where did you get the 90% stat?? Pull it out of a hat? Nor have you substantiated this rhetorical claim "The only reason US troops are still there is because if they leave, havoc will ensue. " To believe your statement, we would have to believe this, that the US troops being in iraq, has caused a sea of calmness and tranquility, and if they leave havoc will ensue LOL. Do you see the ridiculousness in your claim, likely not? You can NOT prove that this is what will ensue if the troops leave, unless you are claiming psychic abilities? The only thing we KNOW FOR SURE is since the US invaded and occupied , havoc has ensued! everything else is nonsense, as purveyed by yourself. I think it is yourself that should move along, get informed, and stop making nonsensical hysterically funny, demonstrating your own foolishness, type claims. Quote Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).
buffycat Posted April 18, 2007 Author Report Posted April 18, 2007 I wouldn't hold my breath Kuzadd - as what he says cannot be backed up whatsoever. It's pretty clear that no matter how awful it was under Hussien - things are far worse under the Americans/Brits. Also, the abuses at Abu Graib, Gitmo and the countless 'secret rendition' spots scattered in the winds all over the world certainly do not speak well of the US Admin. Did you read Layla Anwars recent piece? http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m32211&hd=&size=1&l=e He can't uphold his statement - there are NO facts to back him up. *sigh* Quote "An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind" ~ Ghandi
M.Dancer Posted April 19, 2007 Report Posted April 19, 2007 BTW: You haven't PROVEN your claim on this forum re: " 90% of the violence is sectarian terrorism directed against iraqis by iraqis. " Where did you get the 90% stat?? Pull it out of a hat?Nor have you substantiated this rhetorical claim "The only reason US troops are still there is because if they leave, havoc will ensue. " Two things. first I am careful about things I put in my mouth, so try and find another way to win your losing arguments. Nor have you substantiated this rhetorical claim "The only reason US troops are still there is because if they leave, havoc will ensue. " BTW: You haven't PROVEN your claim on this forum re: " 90% of the violence is sectarian terrorism directed against iraqis by iraqis. " Where did you get the 90% stat?? Pull it out of a hat? I am being generous here....the number is closer to 99% Fill Your Boots Lets see...I have provided a source for iraqi on iraqi violence....and you have provided nothing but spittle and froth..... I didn't make that claim. Second.... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
M.Dancer Posted April 19, 2007 Report Posted April 19, 2007 I wouldn't hold my breath Kuzadd - as what he says cannot be backed up whatsoever. Sorry, You lose Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.