Inhofe calls the goracles hand

[B. Max]

Not really, when some group which touts the benefits of climate change is also funded by Exxonmobil who would lose profits due to more environmental regulation's, it cast's doubt on the so called "facts".

I'll take the advice of people who aren't funded by big oil.

Well i won't. Big oil provide the jobs and standard of living we enjoy. I will not take the words of one worlders who want to install a Marxist one world government run by the UN, or shills like gore who is proven to be a liar. Billions of tax dollars extorted to promote the global warming scam from people to pay for their own enslavement. I will rely on the real science.

[Canadian Blue]

Well i won't. Big oil provide the jobs and standard of living we enjoy.

Not to mention the smog, wars, and the health problems created as well.

I will not take the words of one worlders who want to install a Marxist one world government run by the UN, or shills like gore who is proven to be a liar.

Marxist one world government, I don't see how becoming environmentally friendly will lead to communism.

Al Gore isn't a liar, you just don't like him because you disagree with him.

Billions of tax dollars extorted to promote the global warming scam from people to pay for their own enslavement. I will rely on the real science.

You mean the science done up by people funded by big oil? What's the point, especially if they do find out they are harming the environment, I doubt they would want anyone to know.

[B. Max]

Well i won't. Big oil provide the jobs and standard of living we enjoy.

You mean the science done up by people funded by big oil? What's the point, especially if they do find out they are harming the environment, I doubt they would want anyone to know.

Yeah the general run of the mill nonsense.

[Canadian Blue]

That's because it makes sense, why would you trust big oil to produce results which could hurt the company financially. If those same scientists are being funded by big oil then why would they want to hurt their funding if they gave a differing opinion on global warming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWpkBcWsAME

[B. Max]

That's because it makes sense, why would you trust big oil to produce results which could hurt the company financially. If those same scientists are being funded by big oil then why would they want to hurt their funding if they gave a differing opinion on global warming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWpkBcWsAME

Most the those claims are not true in the first place. Oil does not dictate the science. You are on an anti oil campaign. If you want an african standard of living move to africa. If you think people who work for oil companies are garbage and you want to get rid of them just say so so we can get on with the war. I assure you they are the oil companies and they will not go away.

[Canadian Blue]

If you want an african standard of living move to africa.

No thank's, I'm perfectly fine being in Canada.

Most the those claims are not true in the first place.

Says who, Exxonmobil junk scientists, who hate to think of any more environmental regulation's because it would hurt proft margins.

If you think people who work for oil companies are garbage and you want to get rid of them just say so so we can get on with the war.

That's a big leap my friend. First of all the people aren't all that bad, but let's face it oil hurts the environment. Why don't they use those profits to find new ways of cleaning up the environment instead of giving funding to people that claim the more CO2 we pump into the air, the more earth will look like the Garden of Eden.

So let me get this straight, the United Nation's, BBC, EPA, and a host of other environmental organization's and environmental scientists are all wrong. But, strangely enough a very small minority of scientists who recieve funding from big oil are right.

[B. Max]

'Canadian Blue' date='Mar 23 2007, 12:28 AM' post='199005']

No thank's, I'm perfectly fine being in Canada.

You won't be much longer.

Says who, Exxonmobil junk scientists, who hate to think of any more environmental regulation's because it would hurt proft margins.

The junk scientists are the trough feeding James Hansons and his phony computer models. You make wild claims which you can't back up. If someone says they don't get a cheque and you say they do, then you better be able to produce one with their name on it. Even if they did, the oil companies would be well within their right to do so.

That's a big leap my friend. First of all the people aren't all that bad, but let's face it oil hurts the environment. Why don't they use those profits to find new ways of cleaning up the environment instead of giving funding to people that claim the more CO2 we pump into the air, the more earth will look like the Garden of Eden.

I don't see any hurt to the environment and most especially from CO2.

So let me get this straight, the United Nation's, BBC, EPA, and a host of other environmental organization's and environmental scientists are all wrong. But, strangely enough a very small minority of scientists who recieve funding from big oil are right.

That's a false claim right there. Who says it's a majority. The corrupt UN. The environmental nut bars like Gore and Suzuki.

The idiot Gore who refuses all challenges to a debate because he can't back up his ridiculous claims and won't have a dough head like Barbra Boxer there to bail him out.

http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/2007/03/a...to_climate.html

[Black Dog]

It is the climate alarmists who don't no the difference and of course the dupes of dooms day.

The climate alarmists aren't the one's producing photos of icicles in Buffalo as evidence against global warming!

Well i won't. Big oil provide the jobs and standard of living we enjoy. I will not take the words of one worlders who want to install a Marxist one world government run by the UN, or shills like gore who is proven to be a liar. Billions of tax dollars extorted to promote the global warming scam from people to pay for their own enslavement. I will rely on the real science.

Stop stealing PolyNewbie's lines.

[Canadian Blue]

Let's see B.Max, Inhofe wouldn't even allow Gore to respond to the questions.

You won't be much longer.

What's that suppose to mean, so am I moving to New Zealand or something.

The junk scientists are the trough feeding James Hansons and his phony computer models. You make wild claims which you can't back up. If someone says they don't get a cheque and you say they do, then you better be able to produce one with their name on it. Even if they did, the oil companies would be well within their right to do so.

I backed them all up with links, and on those links is the proof that your science is junk. Get over yourself.

Didn't you notice that Exxonmobil had funded the CO2 is good for the atmosphere group that recieved $90,000 from Exxon.

That's a false claim right there. Who says it's a majority. The corrupt UN. The environmental nut bars like Gore and Suzuki.

Buddy, you trust a massive oil company that want's to drill in an animal refuge, are you insane?

How is it a false claim, the vast majority of scientists believe that climate change is hurting the planet. Just because you say it's a false claim, doesn't mean it's false.

I'm sorry that the factonistas are able to dispute everything you say. But let's get beyond your truthiness arguments, and start seeing the issue from a perspective different than Exxon mobils.

[sunsettommy]

Well since nobody heeded my suggestion of a TRANSCRIPT about what the two men actually said.

I will say that you guys failed to prove your claims.

He he he ......

[Canadian Blue]

I provided a youtube video, simply to show how much a goof Inhofe was.

[B. Max]

'Canadian Blue' date='Mar 23 2007, 01:48 PM' post='199114']

Let's see B.Max, Inhofe wouldn't even allow Gore to respond to the questions.

You have that backwards. Gore wouldn't answer the questions. But rather went off on political rant.

What's that suppose to mean, so am I moving to New Zealand or something.

It means this country will look like a third world backwater the way it's going.

I backed them all up with links, and on those links is the proof that your science is junk. Get over yourself.

Your links are not the science. At least not reputable accepted science.

Didn't you notice that Exxonmobil had funded the CO2 is good for the atmosphere group that recieved

$90,000 from Exxon.

So what. Not only is CO2 good it is essential for life on the planet, The vast majority of which is natural.

Buddy, you trust a massive oil company that want's to drill in an animal refuge, are you insane?

No I trust the science. I hope they do drill in anwar. There is no reason not to. You obviously no nothing about the oil business.

How is it a false claim, the vast majority of scientists believe that climate change is hurting the planet. Just because you say it's a false claim, doesn't mean it's false.

Says who James Hanson the man caught falsifying the known US historical temperature records. Suzuki, Gore.

I'm sorry that the factonistas are able to dispute everything you say. But let's get beyond your truthiness arguments, and start seeing the issue from a perspective different than Exxon mobils.

I'm not the slightest bit interested in the smear of a good company no matter what pinko's you trot out.

[B. Max]

'Black Dog' date='Mar 23 2007, 01:28 PM' post='199103']

The climate alarmists aren't the one's producing photos of icicles in Buffalo as evidence against global warming!

But it's fine for the slime ball Gore to run around claiming we're burning a hole in the top of the earth or some such ridiculous claim, and that's fine with you. The climate alarmist have been pointing to just about everything claiming it's global warming the sky is falling.

Stop stealing PolyNewbie's lines.

Maybe it's the other way around.

[B. Max]

Well since nobody heeded my suggestion of a TRANSCRIPT about what the two men actually said.

I will say that you guys failed to prove your claims.

He he he ......

Here's something better.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fus...91-E3975CBB96CB

[sunsettommy]

Well since nobody heeded my suggestion of a TRANSCRIPT about what the two men actually said.

I will say that you guys failed to prove your claims.

He he he ......

Here's something better.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fus...91-E3975CBB96CB

Nope not working.

Try again.

[B. Max]

Here's something better.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fus...91-E3975CBB96CB

Nope not working.

Try again.

Works for me.

[sunsettommy]

I provided a youtube video, simply to show how much a goof Inhofe was.

I asked for a TRANSCRIPT.

Thanks anyway.

[sunsettommy]

B.Max,

I asked for a TRANSCRIPT concerning the verbal exchanges between Al Gore and Senator Inhofe.

What you gave me was this:

"MIT Climate Scientist Calls Fears of Global Warming 'Silly' - Equates Concerns to ‘Little Kids’ Attempting to "Scare Each Other"

February 1, 2007

Posted By Marc Morano - [email protected] 12:33 PM ET - February 1, 2007

MIT Meteorologist Richard Lindzen’s appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live on January 31, 2007 at 9:00 PM EST"

This was between Lindzen,Nye and Cullen.

Try again.

[B. Max]

B.Max,

I

Posted By Marc Morano - [email protected] 12:33 PM ET - February 1, 2007

MIT Meteorologist Richard Lindzen’s appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live on January 31, 2007 at 9:00 PM EST"

This was between Lindzen,Nye and Cullen.

Try again.

I don't have a trans script and never said I did. I said I watched some it on TV.

[sunsettommy]

B.Max,

I

Posted By Marc Morano - [email protected] 12:33 PM ET - February 1, 2007

MIT Meteorologist Richard Lindzen’s appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live on January 31, 2007 at 9:00 PM EST"

This was between Lindzen,Nye and Cullen.

Try again.

I don't have a trans script and never said I did. I said I watched some it on TV.

Oh my!

I from the start specifically asked for a transcript of the exchanges between AL GORE and Senator INHOFE.

So why did you spend all that time directing me to a DIFFERENT transcript to finally say this:

"I don't have a trans script and never said I did. I said I watched some it on TV."

You could have said nothing in the first place and save yourself and mine time from the run around.

LOL

[B. Max]

You could have said nothing in the first place and save yourself and mine time from the run around.

LOL

Well you could have read the original post where I said I had been watching some of it on TV. If I had the Gore trans script I would have given it to you .

[sunsettommy]

You could have said nothing in the first place and save yourself and mine time from the run around.

LOL

Well you could have read the original post where I said I had been watching some of it on TV. If I had the Gore trans script I would have given it to you .

How old are you?

Look Max I read that story even before you posted it on this forum and what is more I even read your first post too.Imagine that!

I had asked for the transcript because No one in this thread was making a provable case on whether Gore or Inhofe was an idiot.

BASED on what they actually said.

Since you and nobody else in this thread provided actual dialoguge between the two men.You and nobody else can NOT prove anything.

Here is my entire first post in this thread.Post #20.

"Come on you guys!

Where is that TRANSCRIPT of the exchange between Gore and Inhofe?

I want to know what they really said.

So far this thread is a classic squabble and no facts."

My second post.#35

"Well since nobody heeded my suggestion of a TRANSCRIPT about what the two men actually said.

I will say that you guys failed to prove your claims.

He he he ......"

You finally bit at post #39.I ignored Canadian blues reply since it was not a TRANSCRIPT.

B.Max:

"Here's something better.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fus...75CBB96CB"

That was in answer to my post # 35.

What I see is that you can not admit that you paid no attention to the fact that I was requesting a TRANSCRIPT on what Gore and Inhofe said.

YOU gave me a link that led me to a very different group of people.

When are you ever going to admit that you gave me a run around?

[B. Max]

sunsettommy' date='Apr 1 2007, 05:37 PM' post='203074']

How old are you?

Old enough to not waste any more energy on your nonsense.

When are you ever going to admit that you gave me a run around?

You gave yourself the run around.

[sunsettommy]

That is fine B.Max

Funny since you ANSWERED my question which was NOT directed to you personally.It was open to anyone who would answer my question.

Since I did not put a gun to your head.It was up to you to make an honest answer.

Something you failed to do.

LOL

[Mad_Michael]

This topic of US politics amuses me.

Gore is an idiot. Therefore global warming doesn't exist.

Gotta love US partisan politics. This apparently passes for serious discussion.