9/11

margrace · January 23, 2007

Politicians are no longer politicians. They work for the worlds elite and represent no common man nor country. They are highly paid brainwashers, visioning facilitators, decievers, liars, and theives. We are forced to pay their salariies. We are forced to fund all global Governance initiatives, which literally stole the wealth, property, savings, and security of every commoner on the planet. The wealth that was amassed in the last three decades by these criminals is truly beyond comprehension - literally beyond the comprehension of common people. We live in unfathanable states of ignorance. We have been robbed blind, yet we still can't acknowledge the theft of our money, livelihoods, children, potential, nation and future.

GostHacked · January 23, 2007

you are totally FREE to do anything you like on your own land if you can afford some, as long as the neighbors don't complain, and you make no changes. Of course, they may need to inspect it at anytime for weapons, and can take your weapons away at anytime if they like, and the courts will take the cops word for anything they say without any proof, so they can harrass you whenever they like, but you have the right to vote for anyone that has a chance of winning who has no chance of getting you equal rights in court, and you have no right to sleep in a public place, unless they feel it's OK, and you are free to work for any wage fixing company you like, but are sometimes not allowed to unionize.

This proves you are NOT TOTALY FREE. You are a slave to the New World Order. European Union, African Union, North American Union, (soon a pan asian union and South America) The world is getting 'divided' up into 5 regions on the planet, then eventually replaced by a World Government. The UN is a part of that process.

Polynewbie is correct in many things he has stated on MLW. I have read it, and seen the progression of all this. Maybe you have not because you are too busy watching the clap trap on TV that they put there to make you not even to want to think about what really is going on.

Since the European Union came to Britian, she has lost total control over it's country. All decisions are now made by Brussels.

9/11. Nine, one, one. EMERGENCY!!! That day was a drastic turning point to this New World Order.

PolyNewbie · January 23, 2007

Ghost Hacked: All decisions are now made by Brussels.

A lot of people on RBN think its the Vatican and the English Royalty. They could give us monetary reform in a month and destroy the bankers.

The thing about the Vatican is that Bishops are more easily bribed and controlled than members of congress because they have more access to children and are more secretive.

I don't know - no one will know until the end, maybe not even then.

Alex Jones says many congress people are under control of NWO because they have them in pictures doing homosexual acts, etc - stuff they can bribe them with if they don't march to the NWO tune. They release the info to the news when co-operation isn't given.

PolyNewbie · January 23, 2007

guyser:I will ask again. Where are these centres?

Inside old buildings at or very near railway junctions. You have google. A well known journalist (forget who right now) was arrested about a month ago for filming these.

They are in every country not just Canada and the USA. Lyndon LaRouche emailed me back and answered my question personally about this. He says they are everywhere.

Paul Craig Roberts writes about them Keith Oberman has talked about them on MSNBC. Mainstream has announced Haliburton contracts to build more.

Canadian Blue · January 23, 2007

The USA currently has two parties running aginst each other: The Rockefeller Democrats and the Rockefeller Republicans. They also have electronic voting so they have decided who will be president before voting even begins. It can be shown with a very high degree of certainty that Bush stole his first federal election.
Any resemblance to democracy is purely illusionary.

So you're saying that liberal minded member's of the Republican and Democrat parties are against democracy?

As for Bush stealing the first election, remember that Kerry could have won the last election if a few thousand more had voted democrat. I think the US should look at changing the way they elect a president in general.

Inside old buildings at or very near railway junctions. You have google. A well known journalist (forget who right now) was arrested about a month ago for filming these.

I saw the video, they aren't concentration camp's or military facilities. Don't you think they would have guard's.

They are in every country not just Canada and the USA. Lyndon LaRouche emailed me back and answered my question personally about this. He says they are everywhere.

Lyndon Larouche is a known neo-fascist, and the ADL has shown that he is anti-semitic. His view's are fairly totalitarian, and is paranoid.

guyser · January 23, 2007

The USA currently has two parties running aginst each other: The Rockefeller Democrats and the Rockefeller Republicans. They also have electronic voting so they have decided who will be president before voting even begins. It can be shown with a very high degree of certainty that Bush stole his first federal election.
Any resemblance to democracy is purely illusionary.

So you're saying that liberal minded member's of the Republican and Democrat parties are against democracy?

As for Bush stealing the first election, remember that Kerry could have won the last election if a few thousand more had voted democrat. I think the US should look at changing the way they elect a president in general.

Inside old buildings at or very near railway junctions. You have google. A well known journalist (forget who right now) was arrested about a month ago for filming these.

I saw the video, they aren't concentration camp's or military facilities. Don't you think they would have guard's.

They are in every country not just Canada and the USA. Lyndon LaRouche emailed me back and answered my question personally about this. He says they are everywhere.

Lyndon Larouche is a known neo-fascist, and the ADL has shown that he is anti-semitic. His view's are fairly totalitarian, and is paranoid.

Poly,

Yea , what he said.

PolyNewbie · January 23, 2007

PolyNewbie:The USA currently has two parties running aginst each other: The Rockefeller Democrats and the Rockefeller Republicans. They also have electronic voting so they have decided who will be president before voting even begins. It can be shown with a very high degree of certainty that Bush stole his first federal election.
Any resemblance to democracy is purely illusionary.

CanadianBlue: So you're saying that liberal minded member's of the Republican and Democrat parties are against democracy?

:unsure:

diablo · January 23, 2007

Where were you on 9/11.I stood openmouthed about 600 ft from ground zero.I was paralized as I watched airliners crash into first one then the other of the two towers.I watched terrified as people jumped from floors 100 or more stories up to keep from burning to death.

This was not a conspiracy,it was not the government it was not jackfrost or the easter rabbit.It was a terrorist attack on American soil.Was it aimed at only the USA or was it aimed at the world?That is about the only question.

People who realy believe in any conspiracy should see a very good phyciatrist.

PolyNewbie · January 23, 2007

Some people think that it is more responsible to look at 911 from an objective point of view and keep emotions out of it altogather. I can do that because I wasn't there and I didn't lose anything from the occurance of 911.

When I look at this objectively and as a person with an expert knowledge of the basic physics required to see that 911 was an obvious job. Few people attempt to argue that 911 was Osama Bin Laden based on basic physics because that is foolish.

When I look at the circumstantial evidence behind 911, events that happened before after and during the crashes, it becomes obvious to me that 911 was an inside job.

When I consider the problem in itself, I consider how incredibly dangerous it would be if 911 was in fact an inside job and everyone ignored it. The consequences of this would be catostrophy.

The New World Order wants violence, it needs it to give credibilty to the police state they want to implement. The last thing we want to do is violence. Its what the government wants and if they don't get it they will stage it. A movement like this cannot win against an army and thats been true since the 30's according to Quigley (Trajedy & Hope), there is no point in even trying - a population cannot win against a determined foreign enemy that has government weapons. The consequences of 911 must change politically.

Iraq is a meat grinder. Bush is not taking the advice of his generals again. This is not due to the fact that Bush is an idiot. Makeing idiots think that way is the game here. Kissinger and the other ones that are there evryday running the crisis know exactly what they are doing. There are destroying the army and we will have foreign soldiers on our soil. Concentration camps are real, they have been on mainstream media. People out there can sit on this rackety fence until it falls down or those who think they are on the safe side of it can sit there and watch all this play out but to them I ask if they have gotten their instructions for the new language.

Aldous Huxley had a brother and he was the first director of UNESCO and wrote the plans for the New World Order. People have come out about the New World Order since its inception throughout its history. Look up Aldous Huxley Brave New World "The New World Order". We can see the book "1984" comming true around us (not Huxley). These people had something to say to us, Aldous Huxley had more non fiction works published than fiction works published.

Riverwind · January 23, 2007

When I look at this objectively and as a person with an expert knowledge of the basic physics required to see that 911 was an obvious job.

Your physics has been debunked and shown to be rubbish. Get back to us when you have a proof that shows exactly how the building was wired and how the explosions were timed to start a collapse in a burning building at the exact point where the planes crashed into the building.

guyser · January 23, 2007

Some people think that it is more responsible to look at 911 from an objective point of view and keep emotions out of it altogather. I can do that because I wasn't there and I didn't lose anything from the occurance of 911.
When I look at this objectively and as a person with an expert knowledge of the basic physics required to see that 911 was an obvious job. Few people attempt to argue that 911 was Osama Bin Laden based on basic physics because that is foolish.

Your first paragraph is indeed correct. An objective viewpoint , and lack of emotion is paramount to get to the truth of the matter.

Sadly, you are not that person. You have come to the table with pre-conceived ideas , be it the Union of NA, the banks holding us all hostage, ad nauseum. This hardly , no wait-let me clarify, this ensures you have no objectiveness whatsoever.

What would be your expert knowledge of basic physics? Masters degree , PHD , or as widely suspected an internet wizard?

PolyNewbie · January 23, 2007

Bush Sr Uses the term New World Order a pile of times during the Iraq war. The term has since been replaced with "Globalization". "Globalization" some makes it more acceptable but this is a term for the preliminiary process before The New World Order "comming into view" (Bush Sr).

PolyNewbie · January 23, 2007

Riverwind:Get back to us when you have a proof that shows exactly how the building was wired and how the explosions were timed to start a collapse in a burning building at the exact point where the planes crashed into the building.

Proof is proof and all of the above can be (is) irrelevant. You do not seem to understand that. The above is also not impossible nor implausible.

PolyNewbie · January 23, 2007

Guyser:What would be your expert knowledge of basic physics? Masters degree , PHD , or as widely suspected an internet wizard?

Someone with a near perfect understanding of first year university mechanics and materials - enough to see what the physical reality is. Riverwind is all wrong in most of his physics - possibly all of it - at least half for sure. As a matter of fact I feel confident to say he has very poor knowledge of basic physics based on his initial errors in a simple problem several posts ago and alost everything he has said since. Thats just reality and I'm not getting into any more physics discussions with Riverwind.

Riverwind · January 23, 2007

Someone with a near perfect understanding of first year university mechanics and materials - enough to see what the physical reality is.

You are someone who seems to think that bodies can start rotating with no force other than gravity acting on them. You are someone who makes up numbers and then claims to have a irrefutable proof based on those numbers. You are someone who ignores gaping holes in your own theories and tries to pretend they are irrelevent. You will jump on every omitted detail in the NIST explaination and claim that the NIST explaination proves nothing but you are incapable of seeing the even larger omissions from your theories.

You are hopelessly deluded and hypocritical. You claim to know science but every word that you write shows that you have more in common with a religious fanatic than a scientist.

guyser · January 24, 2007

Someone with a near perfect understanding of first year university mechanics and materials - enough to see what the physical reality is.

So.....first year university mechanics and materials , by that you mean one level above high school? If so, you have me beat.

You do have near perfect understanding I will agree ,at least as far as first year goes, unfortunately it takes many years to be an expert on anything.

Therefore , You have conceded that it would be impossible for your to express your views as anything other than your opinion as you are not accredited in any degree in relation to this debate.

Just to clarify, you can say whatever, as I will post on topics I dont know a whole lot about, but make no mistake I will not hold out to be an expert , and of course, you will no longer be able to say the same.

Canadian Blue · January 24, 2007

Aldous Huxley had a brother and he was the first director of UNESCO and wrote the plans for the New World Order. People have come out about the New World Order since its inception throughout its history. Look up Aldous Huxley Brave New World "The New World Order". We can see the book "1984" comming true around us (not Huxley). These people had something to say to us, Aldous Huxley had more non fiction works published than fiction works published.

Didn't Pat Robertson write the book about "The New World Order". That must give a ton of clout to that theory.

So let me get this straight, we have to fear the Liberal wing of the Republican party, and the Democrat's. As well we must embrace Lyndon Larouche for some reason, despite his obvious paranoia and racial intolerance. That doesn't make any sense.

Iraq is a meat grinder. Bush is not taking the advice of his generals again. This is not due to the fact that Bush is an idiot. Makeing idiots think that way is the game here. Kissinger and the other ones that are there evryday running the crisis know exactly what they are doing. There are destroying the army and we will have foreign soldiers on our soil. Concentration camps are real, they have been on mainstream media. People out there can sit on this rackety fence until it falls down or those who think they are on the safe side of it can sit there and watch all this play out but to them I ask if they have gotten their instructions for the new language.

Why would any president want foreign troop's on there soil, it doesn't make any sense. What mainstream media report's have come in talking about the concentration camps? As well what's wrong with Kissinger?

While I was reading about the NWO it seemed to be all paranoia, and nothing else. It also talks about how the United Nation's is going to take over the United States, which is completely absurd.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Ord...28conspiracy%29

PolyNewbie · January 24, 2007

guyser:You do have near perfect understanding I will agree ,at least as far as first year goes, unfortunately it takes many years to be an expert on anything.

I've known 2+2=4 and not 5 since around 6 years old. I didn't even know what a methematician was when I was 6 years old.

Therefore , You have conceded that it would be impossible for your to express your views as anything other than your opinion as you are not accredited in any degree in relation to this debate.

I know enough about physics to know that the official version of 911 is impossible.

Do you know enough about math to balance your own checkbook ?

PolyNewbie · January 24, 2007

CanadianBlue:So let me get this straight, we have to fear the Liberal wing of the Republican party, and the Democrat's.

Yes.

As well we must embrace Lyndon Larouche for some reason, despite his obvious paranoia and racial intolerance. That doesn't make any sense.

I don't know. I would say it would have to be him or Ron Paul or else the USA is in a lot of trouble. I don't know why many people have a problem with La Rouche but I haven't seen anything that would indicate LaRouche is what you say he is. The fact that he was arrested by the criminal Bush administration is probably an indication of his integrity.

PolyNewbie · January 24, 2007

Riverwind:You are someone who seems to think that bodies can start rotating with no force other than gravity acting on them.

Where exactly did you get that from ?

kimmy · January 24, 2007

Alex Jones says many congress people are under control of NWO because they have them in pictures doing homosexual acts, etc - stuff they can bribe them with if they don't march to the NWO tune. They release the info to the news when co-operation isn't given.

Out of curiousity, who the fuck is Alex Jones? I mean, I know who he is, what I want to know is what credibility he has.

If there was a "powers that be" that has the power to make people disappear at will, wouldn't they have vanished this guy if they thought he was any kind of threat?

If "They" make people who "know too much" disappear, doesn't the fact that Alex Jones hasn't disappeared seem kind of odd? Like, either "They" can't make you disappear, or else Alex Jones just doesn't "know too much" at all.

-k

Riverwind · January 24, 2007

I know enough about physics to know that the official version of 911 is impossible.

That statement demonstrates that you don't understand science at all. Why don't you provide us with your proof for the 'theory of gravity'. It should be easy to do for someone who is convinced that they can prove the unproveable.

No matter how many times you repeat your BS statements it will never change the fact that all you have is a _theory_ that cannot be proven. Furthermore, this theory has many gaping holes that make it an extremely improbable theory.

Canadian Blue · January 24, 2007

I don't know. I would say it would have to be him or Ron Paul or else the USA is in a lot of trouble. I don't know why many people have a problem with La Rouche but I haven't seen anything that would indicate LaRouche is what you say he is. The fact that he was arrested by the criminal Bush administration is probably an indication of his integrity.

You do realize the irony of making claim's about concentration camps, when Lyndon Larouche himself is a neo-fascist, anti-semitic, homophobic, and paranoid as well. That's not the greatest combination for a functional democracy.

guyser · January 24, 2007

I've known 2+2=4 and not 5 since around 6 years old. I didn't even know what a methematician was when I was 6 years old.
I know enough about physics to know that the official version of 911 is impossible.

Do you know enough about math to balance your own checkbook ?

What the hell does 2+2=4 have to do with your "expertise" on phyics? Congrats, you know how to count to 4. So does the rest of the Grade 2's in this country. Consider yourself in good company. Sorry dude, but you left that one over the plate.

Perhaps the official version is impossible, I have some questions about it too. But to debunk the entire thing based onyour knowledge of physics is pretty darn goofy.

My checkbook is balanced thanks. My accountant has a degree , you know, many many years of University, followed by the CPA exams over the course of another year or so after school.

Did you know that every time you open your checkbook a signal is sent out to Worlds Bank and they monitor the amount you put on the cheque. Sometime they even change the amount on you just to play with you.

You can check it out here at www.clockmissingcuckoo.com

Black Dog · January 24, 2007

Out of curiousity, who the fuck is Alex Jones? I mean, I know who he is, what I want to know is what credibility he has.

What? You think they hand out cable access shows to just anybody?

If there was a "powers that be" that has the power to make people disappear at will, wouldn't they have vanished this guy if they thought he was any kind of threat?
If "They" make people who "know too much" disappear, doesn't the fact that Alex Jones hasn't disappeared seem kind of odd? Like, either "They" can't make you disappear, or else Alex Jones just doesn't "know too much" at all.

You forget a third option: that he's in on it. For all we know, Alex Jones is collecting fat cheques from the N.W.O. to spread misinformation and keep people distracted from the government's real plans to extract our precious bodily fluids.