Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Question posed to political analysists on the radio today.

Do attack ads work?

The analysts say they do, what do you think?

"Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains."

— Winston Churchill

Posted

As long as they aren't too rediculous or over the top, I'm sure they help a bit. But there is always the chance of a backlash like the "soldiers in the streets" had.

Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns.

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html

"You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)

Posted

Yes.

Of course that doesn't mean they are guaranteed to success.

What the Conservatives are trying to do with these ads is to define Dion.

They seem to be doing the trick.

The Conservatives were only 4 points from a majority in the last election...

Dion is a verbose, mild-mannered academic with a shaky grasp of English who seems unfit to chair a university department, much less lead a country.

Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen

Posted
LOLOLOLOL

Here is a good one:

What kind of leader is Stephen Harper?

And the CPC are asking for money for theirs, lolololol!

I'm surprised it took this long to respond.

The Tories should have run on the record they are proud of rather than go negative right off the hop. I expect we'll see a lot of this now.

Posted
LOLOLOLOL

Here is a good one:

What kind of leader is Stephen Harper?

And the CPC are asking for money for theirs, lolololol!

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. :lol:

Interesting how they couldn't find a native English speaker for that ad. Is Haper reallyt *that* strong in the Rest of Canada?

Dion is a verbose, mild-mannered academic with a shaky grasp of English who seems unfit to chair a university department, much less lead a country.

Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen

Posted

LOL Atleast he wasn't really lying when he said they wouldn't allow the other parties to get away with taxing income trusts and raiding seniors savings. He never said the CPC woudn't do it the first chance they got.

Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns.

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html

"You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)

Posted
LOL Atleast he wasn't really lying when he said they wouldn't allow the other parties to get away with taxing income trusts and raiding seniors savings. He never said the CPC woudn't do it the first chance they got.

Explain again how you are non-partisan?

I thank you for keeping the personal attacks aside for at least a few posts.

Dion is a verbose, mild-mannered academic with a shaky grasp of English who seems unfit to chair a university department, much less lead a country.

Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen

Posted

LOL Atleast he wasn't really lying when he said they wouldn't allow the other parties to get away with taxing income trusts and raiding seniors savings. He never said the CPC woudn't do it the first chance they got.

Explain again how you are non-partisan?

I thank you for keeping the personal attacks aside for at least a few posts.

Prove how I am Partisan.

Why no repsonse in the other thread? Don't be embarassed over your spelling mistake. It happens.

Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns.

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html

"You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)

Posted
The Tories should have run on the record they are proud of rather than go negative right off the hop. I expect we'll see a lot of this now.

Yes, much the same way the Liberals did with all of their accomplishments.....in our cities, in Canada.

"Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains."

— Winston Churchill

Posted
Yes, much the same way the Liberals did with all of their accomplishments.....in our cities, in Canada.

I was opposed to the negative campaign. Thought all it did was make the Liberals look bad.

I guess you favour negative campaigns.

Posted

Yes, much the same way the Liberals did with all of their accomplishments.....in our cities, in Canada.

I was opposed to the negative campaign. Thought all it did was make the Liberals look bad.

I guess you favour negative campaigns.

That's a scary,scary thing to say, especially when the shoe is on the other foot.

"Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains."

— Winston Churchill

Posted
Prove how I am Partisan.

Why no repsonse in the other thread? Don't be embarassed over your spelling mistake. It happens.

No reason to capitalize partisanship.

As for your attack on a typo, I guess your feelings on them change from time to time. Typical double-standard. Not unexpected.

Ooohh Tough guy, attacking a typo.

As for your double-standard on partisanship?

I have provided evidence of your partisan behaviour once. I'll never *prove* it to your satisfaction. Got you blocked now so have fun stalking somebody else for the next couple days.

Back to the topic of this thread ....

So anybody have an over/under on how many times that lame knock-off faux-Liberal attack ad from Youtube gets posted here? I'll start the line at 10 1/2... :lol:

Dion is a verbose, mild-mannered academic with a shaky grasp of English who seems unfit to chair a university department, much less lead a country.

Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen

Posted
That's a scary,scary thing to say, especially when the shoe is on the other foot.

You mean that it makes the Tories look bad? I think it does. Guess the next polls will show how people feel about it as tactic. Next poll comes out the week after Superbowl.

Posted
You mean that it makes the Tories look bad? I think it does. Guess the next polls will show how people feel about it as tactic. Next poll comes out the week after Superbowl.

Really. Do tell which polling company is releasing this poll?

Three day roll it would have to come out on the Thursday at the earliest.

My guess is we'll see at least one poll in the next eight days.

Where do you come up with such tripe.

Dion is a verbose, mild-mannered academic with a shaky grasp of English who seems unfit to chair a university department, much less lead a country.

Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen

Posted
Do attack ads work?
They always worked for me.

The earliest attack ad that I remember was a Liberal ad attacking Mulroney. The television ad depicted him pushing a shopping cart filled with his promises. When he got to the check-out counter, the hook at the end of the ad said something like "You can not afford all those promises!" and that convinced me. I voted Liberal.

The next attack ad that I remember was the Tory ad attacking half of Chretien's glamorous face. That one was easy. I voted Tory.

The next attack ad that I remember was the Liberal ad warning of the "soldiers in the streets with guns" and that scared the hell out of me. I thought: "Our soldiers should not be allowed to carry guns whether they are on OUR streets or on some foreign streets!" and I voted Liberal.

Now, with these latest Tory ads attacking Dion's difficulty setting priorities, I think I will vote Tory.

We do not have time for a meeting of the flat earth society.

<< Où sont mes amis ? Ils sont ici, ils sont ici... >>

Posted
No reason to capitalize partisanship.

As for your attack on a typo, I guess your feelings on them change from time to time. Typical double-standard. Not unexpected.

I'm the one with a double standard?????

LMFAO :lol::lol::lol: You are hilarious.

Where is the attack? You see everything as an attack against you, when you do far worse to others in multiple posts every day. Typical "Bully" behaviour. "Nevermind what I do, look at what the big meanie is doing to me." You invent attacks on yourself to feel important I guess.

As for your double-standard on partisanship?

I have provided evidence of your partisan behaviour once. I'll never *prove* it to your satisfaction. Got you blocked now so have fun stalking somebody else for the next couple days.

You won't do it because you could never prove that I am partisan. I don't care who you want to try and prove it to, I am flat out saying you could never do it, because your accusations are untrue. Just like you view every differing oppinion as a direct personal attack, you see every criticism of the CPC as Partisan hackery. I doubt you understand exactly what partisanship really is.

Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns.

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html

"You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)

Posted
LOL Atleast he wasn't really lying when he said they wouldn't allow the other parties to get away with taxing income trusts and raiding seniors savings. He never said the CPC woudn't do it the first chance they got.

Well, technically lying by omission is still considered lying.

When the rich wage war, it's the poor who die. ~Jean-Paul Sartre

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...