African Union?

[GostHacked]

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/11/16/annan-darfur.html

In order to help out the crisis in Darfur the UN and the AU will get together and send in peace keepers.

Sudan has agreed in principle to allow for a joint United Nations and African Union peacekeeping force in the troubled region of Darfur, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said Thursday.

So now we have the European Union, the African Union, and the North American Union is on it's way as well. Seems like the Globalists have been busy.

http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/index/index.htm

[bradco]

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/11/16/annan-darfur.html

In order to help out the crisis in Darfur the UN and the AU will get together and send in peace keepers.

Sudan has agreed in principle to allow for a joint United Nations and African Union peacekeeping force in the troubled region of Darfur, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said Thursday.

So now we have the European Union, the African Union, and the North American Union is on it's way as well. Seems like the Globalists have been busy.

http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/index/index.htm

The AU has been actively involved of the matter for awhile

North American Union wont happen, at least not for a long, long time

In a way the building of regional unions is stepping back from globalization. Are you concerned about the creation os regional unions? Why or why not?

[jbg]

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/11/16/annan-darfur.html

In order to help out the crisis in Darfur the UN and the AU will get together and send in peace keepers.

Sudan has agreed in principle to allow for a joint United Nations and African Union peacekeeping force in the troubled region of Darfur, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said Thursday.

So now we have the European Union, the African Union, and the North American Union is on it's way as well. Seems like the Globalists have been busy.

http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/index/index.htm

Seems like a great use for money in a region where the countries have been shaking the tin cup since "independence" or better called "thugocracy".

[GostHacked]

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/11/16/annan-darfur.html

In order to help out the crisis in Darfur the UN and the AU will get together and send in peace keepers.

Sudan has agreed in principle to allow for a joint United Nations and African Union peacekeeping force in the troubled region of Darfur, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said Thursday.

So now we have the European Union, the African Union, and the North American Union is on it's way as well. Seems like the Globalists have been busy.

http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/index/index.htm

The AU has been actively involved of the matter for awhile

North American Union wont happen, at least not for a long, long time

In a way the building of regional unions is stepping back from globalization. Are you concerned about the creation os regional unions? Why or why not?

Amalgamation of power. Also this makes it easier for a world body government to step in down the road. You will no longer have individual countries in a region supporting a topic, but the whole region will be blanketed with one topic and one vote essentially. In the North American Union, we as Canada no longer have a say in what goes on in this continent. You can try to see it as a compromise between the US, Canada and Mexico, but .. I will use a corporate takeover analogy here.. some posts will get downsized or eliminated altogether. So much redundancy that people will loose jobs. You can bet this will have an impact on the economy of the region. Borders will be erased, identities will be erased. All for this new cause and new way of life. I can see nothing good from this large union for someone is going to get the shaft.

Absolute Power corrupts absolutely.

And actually this makes it easier for globalization. Some countries in the African Union may not have a say anymore about what goes on in their country. Indonesia is a great example of how globalization can shape the policy of one country to the benefit of others. Policy was created and influenced by Corporate America.

It could go both ways. But how can you have an African Union when most of the countries are really still waring with each other, and so much civil strife in almost every African country in existence. How does the Union help those who need it most?

[colliver19]

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/11/16/annan-darfur.html

In order to help out the crisis in Darfur the UN and the AU will get together and send in peace keepers.

Sudan has agreed in principle to allow for a joint United Nations and African Union peacekeeping force in the troubled region of Darfur, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said Thursday.

So now we have the European Union, the African Union, and the North American Union is on it's way as well. Seems like the Globalists have been busy.

http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/index/index.htm

The AU has been actively involved of the matter for awhile

North American Union wont happen, at least not for a long, long time

In a way the building of regional unions is stepping back from globalization. Are you concerned about the creation os regional unions? Why or why not?

This won't make me popular in Canada or Mexico but I think the North American Union has already happened - it's called United States hegemony in North America. The rules of the union are simple:

1. Canada will do what the United States tells it to.

2. Mexico will do what the United States tells it to.

[Charles Anthony]

Before this gets out of hand, you guys should trim your quotes. There is no need to repeat the entire previous post in a quotation. Please refer to this thread: Using the [ Quote ] Feature: Avoid using more too many quotes!

[nickjbor]

the african union has been around for decades, and they have less power then the UN does, which I did not think was possible.