Opposition MPs Using the Troops AGAIN

[killjoy]

lol. Well I can't accuse you of not having a decent sense of humor. I guess that's something.

Cheers.

.

[gerryhatrick]

Settle down. That is not what the poster said, not in the least.

Yes it is what he said. Now all of a sudden the idea that there could be security concerns is declared a fake when complaining about security is all you guys ever do..

The poster did not say there were no security concerns in Afghanistan. If you continue to make that claim then you will demonstrate clearly the type of poster you are.

[killjoy]

The poster did not say there were no security concerns in Afghanistan. If you continue to make that claim then you will demonstrate clearly the type of poster you are.

No, the poster claimed that security concerns were a false reason or hard to believe reason....after all the times you guys come here to yak about security concerns in Afghanistan....which is exactly what I said Bobo.

Just STFU, ok gerry? You're little more than a Bot around here. We're all too aware of your complete inability to understand plain english without using your special "translations".....

.

[gerryhatrick]

The poster did not say there were no security concerns in Afghanistan. If you continue to make that claim then you will demonstrate clearly the type of poster you are.

No, the poster claimed that security concerns were a false reason or hard to believe reason....after all the times you guys come here to yak about security concerns in Afghanistan....which is exactly what I said Bobo.

Just STFU, ok gerry? You're little more than a Bot around here. We're all too aware of your complete inability to understand plain english without using your special "translations".....

.

The poster did not say there were no security concerns in Afghanistan, which is what you claimed:

LOL! Oh - now all of a sudden there are no security concerns in Afghanistan! laugh.gif

Another fine example of blatant dishonesty and clumsy spinning.

What the poster did suggest was that "security concerns" were not the real reason that some people are being denied access into Afghanistan.

[killjoy]

gerry you haven't an honest bone in your body:

Michaelle Jean has been repeatedly asking Rick Hillier to go since early 2006 but she's been told that there are security concerns. This same excuse has been used to block visits by the House of Commons multi-party defence committee and the Senate multi-party national security committee.

As pointed out numerious times by you guys the security concerns are real, not an "excuse".

Maybe that's the security concern...Harper's own insecurity. I suspect there'd be far more of our troops

interested in seeing her than Harper, MacKay and O'Connor combined.

Here he implies that there isn't a security concern by implying that the "real" security concern is harper's "insecurity.

What the poster did suggest was that "security concerns" were not the real reason that some people are being denied access into Afghanistan.

And that's exactly what I said, bot - after all the times you guys come here to whine about security concerns, now with no more reason than it's convienent to your delusions, now all of a sudden you decide it couldn't possibly be the reason. It's it's dishonest and idiotic - the very same reasons the Liberals aren't in office anymore: they're dishonest and plain stupid.

Again you demonstrate your complete dishonesty and inability to admit when someone has a point or read English properly, take your pick. You can barely read and no one's talking to you either, so shut up. I notice your vow to ignore me only applies to when you can't answer a question, and not to your simple-minded cheerleading from the sidelines. Go away bot.

.

[gerryhatrick]

gerry you haven't an honest bone in your body:

Michaelle Jean has been repeatedly asking Rick Hillier to go since early 2006 but she's been told that there are security concerns. This same excuse has been used to block visits by the House of Commons multi-party defence committee and the Senate multi-party national security committee.

As pointed out numerious times by you guys the security concerns are real, not an "excuse".

Something being real does not preclude it from being used as an "excuse".

Again you demonstrate your complete dishonesty and inability to admit when someone has a point or read English properly, take your pick. You can barely read and no one's talking to you either, so shut up. I notice your vow to ignore me only applies to when you can't answer a questiona nd not to your simple-minded cheerleadiong on the sidelines. Go away bot.

Maybe you're not aware of the zero tollerance policy in effect. I guess we'll see if it has any bite in light of these extreme and profane personal attacks on me.

[killjoy]

lol! Hilarious. More dishonesty: You start a fight and now prod the mods into taking action.

I am aware of it. If characterizing someone who simply snipes from the sidelines as a cheerleader gets me banned, oh well. If characterizing you as nothing more than a bot is not alloweed, oh well I guess I'll never be back....which is exactly what you're trying to do isn't it, Mr. Honesty.

You're a prime example why the Liberals are out.

My guess though is that the mods know you for the obscene PM poster and troll you are and aren't going to bend to your BS juvenile tactics. Maybe I'm wrong but oh well if I am. There's only a couple of hundred peopel on this forum. Naturally anyone banned can simply go elsewhere and considering you can't argue your way out of a paper bag I'm sure sitting here posting anti-Harper threads by yourself all day suits you ust fine.

.

[gerryhatrick]

lol! Hilarious. More dishonesty: You start a fight and now prod the mods into taking action..

I did not start a fight. I pointed out quite calmly and politely that the poster did not say what you claimed he said. And anyone would ask for some moderation after the your behaviour in this topic.

[killjoy]

yeah you are starting a fight....after vowing to ignore me. (lol)

You're taking an arbitrary semantic argument simply to start a fight - in fact it's not really an argument at all. You're simply pointing out the blatantly obvious that doesn't change my point in the least. Really all you've done is try a pretentious, wordier version of "Nah-uh. Is not!".

I don't need your stamp of approval, especially in light of your poor english comprehension , to make the accusation that the views are conflicting and hypocritical. Naturally the idea that something exists does not automatically preclude it form being an excuse, but it is more than reasonable to point out that it's more than simply convenient to such partisan viewpoints to one minute claim one thing and claim something completely different the next and not see the contradiction.

IOW, bot, no, something being real doesn't necessarily preclude something from being an excuse, NOR does it preclude the idea that you guys'll just say whatever you want, whatever sounds good at the moment and whatever makes your case sound better even if it's not very honest, does it?

So really you're not saying anything at all. You're just sniping from the sidelines and cheerleading.

.

[southerncomfort]

lol! Hilarious. More dishonesty: You start a fight and now prod the mods into taking action.

I am aware of it. If characterizing someone who simply snipes from the sidelines as a cheerleader gets me banned, oh well. If characterizing you as nothing more than a bot is not alloweed, oh well I guess I'll never be back....which is exactly what you're trying to do isn't it, Mr. Honesty.

You're a prime example why the Liberals are out.

My guess though is that the mods know you for the obscene PM poster and troll you are and aren't going to bend to your BS juvenile tactics. Maybe I'm wrong but oh well if I am. There's only a couple of hundred peopel on this forum. Naturally anyone banned can simply go elsewhere and considering you can't argue your way out of a paper bag I'm sure sitting here posting anti-Harper threads by yourself all day suits you ust fine.

Best thing to do with spammers like GH is to not reply, hard not to tho I know, if you don't feed the trolls they get hungry and go somewhere else.

I wonder if he a paid liberal or NDP staffer ?

[killjoy]

I wonder if he a paid liberal or NDP staffer ?

I'm certain of it. Search his threads. If you can find more than two that aren't about Harper in some way I'll mail you $20.

Bad footwear is leading the nation into poor posture? Harper's fault.

.

[normanchateau]

What the poster did suggest was that "security concerns" were not the real reason that some people are being denied access into Afghanistan.

I'm the poster so I can confirm that this is indeed what I meant. Yes, there are security concerns but I suspect there might be other motives as well. That's all I was implying.

I wish everyone would lighten up a bit so that we could exchange arguments without getting personal and stressed.

[gerryhatrick]

What the poster did suggest was that "security concerns" were not the real reason that some people are being denied access into Afghanistan.

I'm the poster so I can confirm that this is indeed what I meant. Yes, there are security concerns but I suspect there might be other motives as well. That's all I was implying.

I wish everyone would lighten up a bit so that we could exchange arguments without getting personal and stressed.

Second that.

[killjoy]

norman:

I'm the poster so I can confirm that this is indeed what I meant. Yes, there are security concerns but I suspect there might be other motives as well. That's all I was implying.

Thank you.

I wish everyone would lighten up a bit so that we could exchange arguments without getting personal and stressed.

This is more than possible however I don't think you know about our gerry here. This is the guy who would wholesale flood posters with dozens of obscene PM's when got into a temper-tantrum over something silly. I can tell you at least have a sense of humor norm and can at least admit it when someone has a point, (even if you still don't agree overall), but gerry here (- he can "second that" all he likes, he's not fooling anyone -) is simply faking this pretension of maturity, trust me. You like jdobbiin and, well and quite a few others are no problem even though I seriously disagree with them, but gerry is a plain Troll....nothing else.

.

[gerryhatrick]

This is more than possible however I don't think you know about our gerry here. This is the guy who would wholesale flood posters with dozens of obscene PM's when got into a temper-tantrum over something silly. .

I invite the board admin to read my PM (what was it, one, two?) to you and if it was obscene I welcome a banning.

You are not free to lie about other posters here killjoy.

[killjoy]

It was 6 not including the ones you probably sent after I put your PM's on ignore....

And I wasn't the first, nor the last, was I gerry?

Which one should I post first gerry? The one titled "Yer a lying piece of s###", or one of the others? As I read them I can actually hear you crying.

You are not free to lie about other posters here killjoy.

The PM's are right here and they are most certainly obscene and I'm not the only one you tried this tactic with. I don't need to lie, gerry. That's your method operendi.

.

[normanchateau]

Sigh, I'm outa here...for today.

[Greg]

Quit airing grievances in the forums - if you've got a problem with another poster, use the internal PM system. If the PMs are obscene or contain threats, report them to me, otherwise take this childish behaviour out of the forums.

killjoy is taking a one month suspension from the forums, if any of you want one too, keep this up.

[cybercoma]

I have a problem when a poster is almost a constant disruption to the forums and the wrong guy takes the fall.

[scribblet]

I have a problem when a poster is almost a constant disruption to the forums and the wrong guy takes the fall.

I tend to agree with you, I don't think one person should take all the blame there.

[White Doors]

I have a problem when a poster is almost a constant disruption to the forums and the wrong guy takes the fall.

I tend to agree with you, I don't think one person should take all the blame there.

killjoy got suspended and not Gerry? WTF??

[killjoy]

Don't blame greg guys. He's gotta do what he's gotta do. S'not easy running a forum. I knew the risks when I was arguing with gerry but just like greg I gotta do what I gotta do and playing nice with a fake and a bot isn't part of it.

Everytime I come here it's forty new anti-Harper threads by "grass-roots" gerry. Soon it'll be the 'gerry show'. Its his kmission to shout others down not discuss with them. Time for me to move on.

L8r!

PS.: Not to be a smart ass greg, but the software's not working

.

[Canadian Blue]

I realize Greg's job is hard, but it usually takes two to tango. GH had just as much of a part in it as well.

[Greg]

What did I just say to you guys? If you've got a problem with the moderation - there's the door, otherwise cut the complaining and quit wasting my time.