User Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 7 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Which part of my description confused you? Still no meaningful definition. Just dishonest games because you want to pretend dudes can be women. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 24 Author Report Posted March 24 2 hours ago, User said: Still no meaningful definition. Just dishonest games because you want to pretend dudes can be women. Here we go. The little man needs dictionary definitions huh? Oh no!! Those dang dictionaries are all written by leftist scum. Right? Thus, dictionary definitions are meaningless to you, as are anything compiled by "experts" because all the "experts" are leftist scum..... right? You.... are ....a f_cking.... obstinate...buffoon. Nothing anyone says has any affect on you, because you..... jethro the plumber..... knows more about everything than anyone. Right? There we have it. Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 4 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Here we go. The little man needs dictionary definitions huh? Oh no!! Those dang dictionaries are all written by leftist scum. Right? Thus, dictionary definitions are meaningless to you, as are anything compiled by "experts" because all the "experts" are leftist scum..... right? You.... are ....a f_cking.... obstinate...buffoon. Nothing anyone says has any affect on you, because you..... jethro the plumber..... knows more about everything than anyone. Right? There we have it. Not about me needing anything. Just me pointing out how pathetically dumb and dishonest you are. If you want to copy/paste whatever woke revised definition you can find, go for it, and all that will prove is how you are using a dumb definition that almost certainly plays the stupid game of using the term to define the term. I mean, it shouldn't matter what I say or do, if it is a definition you are proud to stand behind, you wouldn't hide from doing so. Reality is, you know it is going to be dumb, so like many other leftists, you just refuse to do it, so you can go on pushing the absurdity that men who think they are women are women. Its fun watching you leftists squirm and run like cowards with such a silly easy question. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 25 Author Report Posted March 25 1 hour ago, User said: Not about me needing anything. Just me pointing out how pathetically dumb and dishonest you are. If you want to copy/paste whatever woke revised definition you can find, go for it, and all that will prove is how you are using a dumb definition that almost certainly plays the stupid game of using the term to define the term. I mean, it shouldn't matter what I say or do, if it is a definition you are proud to stand behind, you wouldn't hide from doing so. Reality is, you know it is going to be dumb, so like many other leftists, you just refuse to do it, so you can go on pushing the absurdity that men who think they are women are women. Its fun watching you leftists squirm and run like cowards with such a silly easy question. Which dictionary isnt "woke", halfwit? Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 51 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Which dictionary isnt "woke", halfwit? Look at you still running from the question. LOL Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 25 Author Report Posted March 25 8 hours ago, User said: Look at you still running from the question. LOL What was your question, halfwit? Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 2 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: What was your question, halfwit? Still running like the coward you are! If I recall, we had a discussion like this some months ago, same thing then too. You ran away once you were pressed to answer this question and got all pissy about it. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 25 Author Report Posted March 25 (edited) 1 hour ago, User said: Still running like the coward you are! If I recall, we had a discussion like this some months ago, same thing then too. You ran away once you were pressed to answer this question and got all pissy about it. I see. Are you going with the 'ol, "you cant define what a woman is" spiel again? Ok. Fair enough: From Websters dictionary: Woman: noun a: an adult female person b: a woman belonging to a particular category (as by birth, residence, membership, or occupation)—usually used in combination. Then we have: Trans Woman:noun : a transgender woman : a woman who was identified as male at birth. Which part of these definitions is so dang confusing for you, boy? Is it a mystery? Or, are you just obstinately ignorant? Id say its the latter..... Edited March 25 by CrakHoBarbie 1 Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 13 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Are you going with the 'ol, "you cant define what a woman is" spiel again? Well, since you ran away from this up until now, yeah. You have highlighted the stupidity at play - Woman is an adult female. Ok, so a woman is a female. You have to define female now. What is a female? The real stupidity is saying a trans woman was “identified” as male at birth, as if it were some mistake or something and they are really a female. So… back to what is a female then? Nothing confusing for me, I’m just pointing out the dishonesty and stupidity you are engaged in supporting here. Because if being a “female” is simply a matter of identifying as one, then the definition is meaningless for what a woman is. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 25 Author Report Posted March 25 1 hour ago, User said: The real stupidity is saying a trans woman was “identified” as male at birth, as if it were some mistake or something and they are really a female. That is a direct merriam-webster definition. So, as predicted, you believe you know more than the experts in the field of definitions. Its called the Dunning-Kruger effect. "A cognitive bias where individuals with limited knowledge or competence in a domain greatly overestimate their own proficiency. Because they lack the expertise to recognize their own incompetence". In other words, you are too stup1d to be able to understand just how stup1d you are. 1 hour ago, User said: You have to define female now. What is a female? Here's where it gets good. You are going to love this..... Female: adjective a(1): of, relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs. (2) botany : having or producing only pistils or pistillate flowers b: having a gender identity that is the opposite of male c: made up of usually adult members of the female sex : consisting of females. Theres more, but for our purposes I made my point. As I already stated, you will now claim that you know more than merrium-webster, and merrium-webster is all part of a giant leftist plot to force transexuals on everyone. So, go ahead. Let's hear it, dimwit. Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 4 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Theres more, but for our purposes I made my point. No, you made mine. Tue definition you provided for Trans Woman is bullshit. “Female” isn’t something you were merely mistakenly “identified” as at birth. They are males. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 25 Author Report Posted March 25 38 minutes ago, User said: No, you made mine. Tue definition you provided for Trans Woman is bullshit. “Female” isn’t something you were merely mistakenly “identified” as at birth. They are males. I didnt provide that definition. Merrium-Webster did. And you, the obstinately ignorant buffoon that you are, "think" you know more than all the experts. You are a delusional buffoon. Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 19 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: I didnt provide that definition. Merrium-Webster did. And you, the obstinately ignorant buffoon that you are, "think" you know more than all the experts. You are a delusional buffoon. Oh, so now you don’t believe the definition they came up with either? You are still playing the dishonest game, hiding behind the dictionary because you know it’s bullshit. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 25 Author Report Posted March 25 1 hour ago, User said: Oh, so now you don’t believe the definition they came up with either? You are still playing the dishonest game, hiding behind the dictionary because you know it’s bullshit. The definition is fine. The problem is you. Youre an id1ot. You dont know sh1t, But you think you know everything. Thats how stup1d you are. Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 49 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: The definition is fine. The problem is you. Youre an id1ot. You dont know sh1t, But you think you know everything. Thats how stup1d you are. You say it’s fine, while ignoring the glaring problem I pointed out. All you can do is hide like the coward you are. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 25 Author Report Posted March 25 44 minutes ago, User said: You say it’s fine, while ignoring the glaring problem I pointed out. All you can do is hide like the coward you are. Sure. You know better than merrium-webster. You know better than the World wide association of psychiatric professionals. You know more than all the experts. Do you know why? Because you're Jethro the know it all plumber, thats why. All hail Jethro the all knowing plumber. The consummate keyboard warrior. I tremble in your shadow.... And throw rose petals at your learned feet. You dumbass. Quote
User Posted March 26 Report Posted March 26 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Sure. You know better than merrium-webster. You know better than the World wide association of psychiatric professionals. You know more than all the experts. Do you know why? Because you're Jethro the know it all plumber, thats why. All hail Jethro the all knowing plumber. The consummate keyboard warrior. I tremble in your shadow.... And throw rose petals at your learned feet. You dumbass. You keep hiding behind saying Merriam-Webster, because you can't actually discuss the facts. You are a coward. The same dishonest game you try to play with the NCAA competition rules, like, just because they said dudes who think they are women can compete if they meet X, Y, and Z, then it must be totally legit! Coward. Have the courage to stand behind your convictions. Just admit you don't give a shit about the facts, about real women, and just want to ensure dudes who think they are women can be treated like women. That would be more honest. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 26 Author Report Posted March 26 2 minutes ago, User said: You keep hiding behind saying Merriam-Webster, because you can't actually discuss the facts. You are a coward. The same dishonest game you try to play with the NCAA competition rules, like, just because they said dudes who think they are women can compete if they meet X, Y, and Z, then it must be totally legit! Coward. Have the courage to stand behind your convictions. Just admit you don't give a shit about the facts, about real women, and just want to ensure dudes who think they are women can be treated like women. That would be more honest. Oh? I've discussed the facts with you. I've cataloged your many grievances. I've posted citation after citation supporting my contentions. You've responded with your "feelings". No supporting citations. Nothing. Just demanding you're correct, over and over and over. Youve made no viable points. all you have is partisan blather. So, youre not only an obstinate ignorant coward, you're right wing propagandas b1tch. A whining b1tch. Quote
User Posted March 26 Report Posted March 26 5 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Oh? I've discussed the facts with you. I've cataloged your many grievances. I've posted citation after citation supporting my contentions. You've responded with your "feelings". No supporting citations. Nothing. Just demanding you're correct, over and over and over. Youve made no viable points. all you have is partisan blather. So, youre not only an obstinate ignorant coward, you're right wing propagandas b1tch. A whining b1tch. LOL, still gonna be a coward. You people will do or say anything just to push this trans madness onto others. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 26 Author Report Posted March 26 1 hour ago, User said: LOL, still gonna be a coward. You people will do or say anything just to push this trans madness onto others. Great! Thanks for your replies! Quote
User Posted March 26 Report Posted March 26 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Great! Thanks for your replies! So, to finish where we left off: You were pushing an absurd definition of Woman and Trans Woman, where both used "female" in the definition as if a trans woman (a dude with a dick and balls and male chromosomes) was just *oops* my bad, identified as what they actually are - a male - and really they are a female! So... rendering "female" as meaningless as it is nothing more than what someone claims to be... rendering "woman" as meaningless. All so you can push the absurdity of men with mental problems into women's spaces, and into their sports, so you can all get your jollies off the pain and suffering of women (real women). Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 26 Author Report Posted March 26 (edited) 8 hours ago, User said: So, to finish where we left off: You were pushing an absurd definition of Woman and Trans Woman, where both used "female" in the definition as if a trans woman (a dude with a dick and balls and male chromosomes) was just *oops* my bad, identified as what they actually are - a male - and really they are a female! So... rendering "female" as meaningless as it is nothing more than what someone claims to be... rendering "woman" as meaningless. All so you can push the absurdity of men with mental problems into women's spaces, and into their sports, so you can all get your jollies off the pain and suffering of women (real women). Said Jethro, the retired plumber. A decrepit old man who argues over dictionary definitions that challenge his feelings. Maybe some tapioca pudding will help? Edited March 26 by CrakHoBarbie Quote
User Posted March 26 Report Posted March 26 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Said Jethro, the retired plumber. A decrepit old man who argues over dictionary definitions that challenge his feelings. Maybe some tapioca pudding will help? These were the definitions YOU provided. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 26 Author Report Posted March 26 1 hour ago, User said: These were the definitions YOU provided. Quote
User Posted March 26 Report Posted March 26 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Yet again, YOU started this thread. As usual, folks like you want to push this crap but then run away when challenged, so you can keep pushing it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.