BIG CELEBRATIONS ALL OVER IRAN. ALI KHAMENEI SENT TO HELL.

[CITIZEN_2015]

Big celebration and fire play all over Iran. A large crowd all over Iran in spite of danger to their lives poured onto streets, playing loud music, dancing mixed and shouting long live Reza Pahlavi.

BIG BIG CELEBRATIONS.

[John Stone]

Reza Pahlavi would be the perfect sock puppet for big oil and by extension any U.S. administration - like his old man. 

We know what happened to his old man. 

To stay in power there is no doubt that Reza would need to control the population - SAVAK come lately. 

[CITIZEN_2015]

On 3/1/2026 at 8:18 AM, John Stone said:

Reza Pahlavi would be the perfect sock puppet for big oil and by extension any U.S. administration - like his old man. 

We know what happened to his old man. 

To stay in power there is no doubt that Reza would need to control the population - SAVAK come lately. 

Stop posting nonsense. The reason his father was overthrown was because he tripled the price of oil in 1973 and caused a recession in the West. He started ambitious development programs in Iran with that additional income. He  was warned several times by the West but he refused to give in. So the British, French and later the Americans joined an unholy plan to overthrow him and they did.

His son is very popular both inside and outside Iran because the nation either remember or told of his father's legacy of prosperity and social (not political) freedom during his father, God bless his soul.

[John Stone]

16 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Stop posting nonsense. The reason his father was overthrown was because he tripled the price of oil in 1973 and caused a recession in the West. He started ambitious development programs in Iran with that additional income. He  was warned several times by the West but he refused to give in. So the British, French and later the Americans joined an unholy plan to overthrow him and they did.

His son is very popular both inside and outside Iran because the nation either remember or told of his father's legacy of prosperity and social (not political) freedom during his father, God bless his soul.

A coup reinstated Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as an absolute monarch and significantly increased the level of influence of the U.S. over Iran - he was a sock puppet. 

Trump's recent comments notwithstanding, Pahlavi's son  (lives in Washington), would be the perfect leader for U.S. economic and geo political interests.

Israel could live with a sock-puppet ........... yeah, perfect choice. 

[CITIZEN_2015]

6 hours ago, John Stone said:

A coup reinstated Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as an absolute monarch and significantly increased the level of influence of the U.S. over Iran - he was a sock puppet. 

Trump's recent comments notwithstanding, Pahlavi's son  (lives in Washington), would be the perfect leader for U.S. economic and geo political interests.

Israel could live with a sock-puppet ........... yeah, perfect choice. 

All lies, reinventing history.

You leftists instead of concentrating on present when just two months ago over 50,000 civilians were massacred by islamist you go back 70 years in the past so that people lose focus on the massacre today. You only serve this murderous regime.

[John Stone]

59 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

All lies, reinventing history.

You leftists instead of concentrating on present when just two months ago over 50,000 civilians were massacred by islamist you go back 70 years in the past so that people lose focus on the massacre today. You only serve this murderous regime.

I think we're both interested in who will rule Iran ............ but don't hold ur breath for a democracy. 

[WestCanMan]

On 3/1/2026 at 5:18 AM, John Stone said:

To stay in power there is no doubt that Reza would need to control the population - SAVAK come lately. 

Raza would need to "stop violent bigots from inflicting themselves on decent people", which is the exact opposite of what the ayaollahs did.

The ayatollahs "employed violent bigots to oppress decent people by using excessive violence on them."

Do you see how the first option is better than the second one, or are you a muslim?

[WestCanMan]

58 minutes ago, John Stone said:

I think we're both interested in who will rule Iran

But you don't want religious freedom and tolerance of non-muslims. 

[CITIZEN_2015]

7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

But you don't want religious freedom and tolerance of non-muslims. 

Which is 80% of Iran's population today. Ironic that in the most anti-Islamic nation, the ruling occupying regime calls itself Islamic. There is an ocean between the nation and the ruling regime. Totally opposite. An anti-Islamic, pro-American, pro-Israeli Westernized secular modern highly educated population governed by a fanatical backward Islamic anti-west, anti-Israel, anti-American regime. 

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Which is 80% of Iran's population today. Ironic that in the most anti-Islamic nation, the ruling occupying regime calls itself Islamic. There is an ocean between the nation and the ruling regime. Totally opposite. An anti-Islamic, pro-American, pro-Israeli Westernized secular modern highly educated population governed by a fanatical backward Islamic anti-west, anti-Israel, anti-American regime. 

The ayatollah was trying to use violence and fear to drive islam into the hearts of Persians and he just made them stronger and more resiliant.

The Persians were not cowed:

Dear ayatollah,

That's not a cow. You lose, dummy.

Have fun in hell. 

 

With jubilance,

Humanity

[John Stone]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

But you don't want religious freedom and tolerance of non-muslims. 

Iran is arguably the 3rd most populous country in the ME 

It is also the most diverse with Persians, Azerbaijanis, Kurds, Lurs, Arabs, Balochs, Talysh a sprinkling of Sunni and of course the Shia majority.

This kebob of culture, religion, et al has ties to populations outside the country and they have their own agendas. 

Chances of a Democracy?

Likely zero - indeed, the above mentioned kebob likely sees opportunity - nationalistic opportunity - start with the peace loving Kurds. 

Simple stability would be a worthy goal .....

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, John Stone said:

It is also the most diverse with Persians, Azerbaijanis, Kurds, Lurs, Arabs, Balochs, Talysh a sprinkling of Sunni and of course the Shia majority.

"Diverse with extreme religious violence inflicted on non-conformists by the gov't" isn't real diversity.

Diverse but with extremely violent intolerance across the entire country every day isn't what humans should strive for. 

Do you understand the level of violence directed at women in Iran, John Stone? Could you please describe that for me, just so we are on the same page?

I have a feeling that you think that Iranian society was more tolerant and inclusive than Canadian society. Is that what you believe?

[John Stone]

50 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

"Diverse with extreme religious violence inflicted on non-conformists by the gov't" isn't real diversity.

Diverse but with extremely violent intolerance across the entire country every day isn't what humans should strive for. 

Do you understand the level of violence directed at women in Iran, John Stone? Could you please describe that for me, just so we are on the same page?

I have a feeling that you think that Iranian society was more tolerant and inclusive than Canadian society. Is that what you believe?

.....arguably fragmentation amongst the cultural mix of Iran  will make something like democracy impossible. 

But lets not a great deal (democracy) get in the way of a good deal (stability).

Oh yeah, sucks to be a split-a$$ in Iran. .....

 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, John Stone said:

Oh yeah, sucks to be a split-a$$ in Iran. .....

WTF is wrong with you? Do you think this is funny? 

[John Stone]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

WTF is wrong with you? Do you think this is funny? 

Do u believe attacking another Nation in  defense of women's rights is a good justification for war?

 

[WestCanMan]

20 hours ago, John Stone said:

Do u believe attacking another Nation in  defense of women's rights is a good justification for war?

Do you believe that's all there is to this war?

1. Do you know that Iran openly talks about genocide against Israel?
2. Iran's terror proxy, Hamas, openly talks about genocide against all Jews. 
3. Iran openly talks about the destruction of the United States. "The Great Satan."
4. Iran has been creating ICBM's and BM's as fast as they can, as well as an attack drone fleet, all to provide cover for their nuclear program
5. their nuclear program was enriching nuclear materials well past the point where they had any civilian application
6. From the Director-General of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi:

7. Grossi, who is running to become the next United Nations secretary general, did however admit in his post on X that Iran maintains "a large stockpile of near-weapons grade enriched uranium" and said that the Islamic Republic has not allowed inspectors full access to its program. With these facts in mind, he said that the IAEA "will not be in a position to provide assurance that Iran’s nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful" until Iran "assists…in resolving the outstanding safeguards issues."

I know your counter-point here will be "But Iran promised Obama" lol. 

I'll take "Iran's promises aren't worth shit" for 1 trillion dollars, Alex. 

Iran is intent on:

1. becoming a nuclear power
2. destroying the US and Israel

That's enough. That's an invitation to war.

 

Thank God for President Trump. If Kamala was president right now Iran would have dozens of nukes already and the world would be royally f'd.

Edited March 8 by WestCanMan

[John Stone]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you believe that's all there is to this war?

1. Do you know that Iran openly talks about genocide against Israel?
2. Iran's terror proxy, Hamas, openly talks about genocide against all Jews. 
3. Iran openly talks about the destruction of the United States. "The Great Satan."
4. Iran has been creating ICBM's and BM's as fast as they can, as well as an attack drone fleet, all to provide cover for their nuclear program
5. their nuclear program was enriching nuclear materials well past the point where they had any civilian application
6. From the Director-General of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi:

7. Grossi, who is running to become the next United Nations secretary general, did however admit in his post on X that Iran maintains "a large stockpile of near-weapons grade enriched uranium" and said that the Islamic Republic has not allowed inspectors full access to its program. With these facts in mind, he said that the IAEA "will not be in a position to provide assurance that Iran’s nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful" until Iran "assists…in resolving the outstanding safeguards issues."

I know your counter-point here will be "But Iran promised Obama" lol. 

I'll take "Iran's promises aren't worth shit" for 1 trillion dollars, Alex. 

Iran is intent on:

1. becoming a nuclear power
2. destroying the US and Israel

That's enough. That's an invitation to war.

 

Thank God for President Trump. If Kamala was president right now Iran would have dozens of nukes already and the world would be royally f'd.

The majority are more concerned (alarmed?)  with the lies, exaggerations, lack of planning, hubris and chest thumping  coming out of the White House than they are with the attack on Iran itself. 

Although the U.S. military has demonstrated outstanding professionalism, precision and training in carrying out their objectives, the same certainly could not be said about the amateurish political performance of  Trump and his Administration as a whole. 

There is some validity to the accusation that Trump punches, 'down' when it comes to projecting force - no  problem in my book, but it is wise to recognize it - there can be some 'slop' is judgement punching, 'down'.  

Trump has 3 years left in his  tenure, considering what we're witnessing in Iran as an example, do you think that he (Trump) and his administration  are capable of making the correct decisions if there is a requirement  for him to, 'punch up'. If the case arose (and it could very easily) do you think he is even  capable of communicating correctly and honestly to the American  people the why, where and how of his actions? Could his cadre? HE IS 80 YEARS OLD - running free and acting on whims - he does not know what he is doing and is surrounded by those who won't speak truth to power. 

Israel has the correct objective - turn Iran into another Syria. 

I am not against the attack per se, but the method in which it was carried out and the communications sustaining it (?)  -  most definitely!

Declare victory, GTFO - leave it to Israel - they do have a plan.

BTW - Iran does not possess  ICBMs.  

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, John Stone said:

The majority are more concerned (alarmed?)  with the lies, exaggerations, lack of planning, hubris and chest thumping  coming out of the White House than they are with the attack on Iran itself. 

That's not a reply.

It's an attempt to portray your own snotty insults against Trump as the main cause for this war when another, blatantly obvious reason is the ayatollah's stated intention of genocide against the US and Israel, and the fact that he's amassing ballistic missiles and drones while also trying to get nuclear weapons.

Buddy, grow up. A country threatened genocide. It's pretty hard to ignore that as 'a cause for war' 🤣🤣. My God, what a cultist you are.

Quote

lack of planning

I'll use that in a sentence for you:

"Despite a lack of planning, America and Israel executed thousands of perfectly timed and coordinated precision attacks on Iran that quickly devastated their leadership and destroyed all of their air defences within minutes, and then waged the most successful war in the history of mankind against Iran, which was previously thought to be an extremely difficult and dangerous adversary."

Wait, are you sure that "lack of planning" fits in there? 

Quote

Although the U.S. military has demonstrated outstanding professionalism, precision and training in carrying out their objectives, the same certainly could not be said about the amateurish political performance of  Trump and his Administration as a whole. 

It's the same US military that completely botched the Afghan withdrawal, from top to bottom, under Biden. 

It's the same US military that had to beg Iran and given them hundreds of millions of dollars to get their sailors back under Obama. 

It's the same US military that couldn't prevent islamic state from ballooning to the size of a large country, and committing a massive genocide, under Obama. 

It's the same US military that sat back and just kept peeing their pants while Iran's proxies launched over 150 attacks on them under Biden.

It's the same US military that did nothing for 13 hours and then had to rely on the grace of an islamic militia to rescue their soldiers in Benghazi while H Clinton and Obama sipped tea.

 

Under Trump, the US military slaughtered islamic state. 

Under Trump, the US military killed Iran's top two generals.

Under Trump, the US military stood their ground and wiped out 200 Russian troops that advanced on them.

Under Trump, the US military was never leaderless or deserted the way they constantly were under Obama and Biden.

Under Trump, America's military has been a juggernaut 24/7/365. It has always managed to impose its will in the exact manner that was intended, every time it was either deployed or tested. It's sad to say, but the US military basically just endured failure status over and over under Obama and Biden, to the point where it was humiliating.

 

You can have your snotty little comments about Trump's 'hurty' words if you want, that's a completely subjective topic, but as a military leader, he towers over Obama and Biden like a giraffe over earthworms maggots. 

Quote

Trump has 3 years left in his  tenure, considering what we're witnessing in Iran as an example, do you think that he (Trump) and his administration  are capable of making the correct decisions if there is a requirement  for him to, 'punch up'. If the case arose (and it could very easily) do you think he is even  capable of communicating correctly and honestly to the American  people the why, where and how of his actions? Could his cadre? HE IS 80 YEARS OLD - running free and acting on whims - he does not know what he is doing and is surrounded by those who won't speak truth to power.

There you are talking about communicating in a "punching up" situation lol....

Buddy, when Biden and several other armies were "punching DOWN" against the Taliban (with their zero fighter plane, zero drone, zero tank army) Biden severed communication with his allies, unilaterally abandoned Bagram and released its prisoners (who became very successful suicide bombers just a couple days later, killing 13 Americans), and turned the wuthdrawal into an "every man for himself" scramble. The US literally just stopped communicating with their longtime allies and ditched almost all of the Afghan supporters, leaving them to die cruel deaths.

And then Biden "communicated" that the US had fired a successful drone strike against Al Qaeda terrorists, only to be corrected later, when we all found out that he had really just killed 7 kids and some aid workers. 

Then he communicated that the withdrawal itself was successful.

That's how you use the word "communication" in a paragraph about the military.

Then he communicated all sorts of other BS, like "no inflation", when the US saw the worst inflation since the great depression. Go look it up, John. Biden's administration saw the highest inflation ever outside of the actual depression, genius. 

Biden's idea of "communicating" was mumbling one single pre-scripted answer to a softball question while eating an ice cream cone. That was his max. And you were ok with that, so that sums up YOUR idea of what communicating is. 

Quote

I am not against the attack per se, but the method in which it was carried out and the communications sustaining it (?)  -  most definitely!

You're grasping at straws to an extent that I've never seen before. The things that you are saying are so blatantly false that it's unbearably pathetic, dude. I'm starting to feel sorry for you.

I think you need to go have a good cry.

Quote

Declare victory, GTFO - leave it to Israel - they do have a plan.

It IS a victory, and Israel can't be seen to be at war against a muslim country all by themselves. The ME simply won't have it. Not even for one second.

JC almighty, you make some really thoughtless comments.

FYI it is Trump that created the Board of Peace for Gaza and he's the one who's orchestrating the ME countries' stance against Iran. 

Without TRUMP and the power of the US military present, that situation will go south very quickly.  

Honestly, and I'm not being mean here, even if Joe Biden was to somehow take over again, that Iran war would do a 180. "When the cat's away..."

Edited March 8 by WestCanMan

[John Stone]

 

................. dude, I think I hit a nerve ............ relax and get urself a mil-spec paper bag, repeat as necessary.

Of late, rambling speeches / rhetoric litter our lives. If talk is cheap it’s because the supply today is definitely exceeding the demand – by far!

[CITIZEN_2015]

On 3/7/2026 at 3:37 PM, John Stone said:

Do u believe attacking another Nation in  defense of women's rights is a good justification for war?

 

Why you are so shallow thinking. It is in defense of the world. There murderous bastards already had many thousands of ballistic missiles reaching Europe soon reaching America and close to 1000 pounds of 60% enriched uranium to make 11 bombs within weeks. These are the people who believe if they kill the other 6 billion people on this planet will go to heaven for it.

[John Stone]

15 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Why you are so shallow thinking. It is in defense of the world. There murderous bastards already had many thousands of ballistic missiles reaching Europe soon reaching America and close to 1000 pounds of 60% enriched uranium to make 11 bombs within weeks. These are the people who believe if they kill the other 6 billion people on this planet will go to heaven for it.

Is recovering the enriched uranium included in the objectives?

.......... the rest? 

The objectives, as stated to date?

meh! 

Not worth the squeeze. 

 

[CITIZEN_2015]

On 3/11/2026 at 8:00 AM, John Stone said:

Is recovering the enriched uranium included in the objectives?

.......... the rest? 

The objectives, as stated to date?

meh! 

Not worth the squeeze. 

 

The final objective is a regime change and liberate Iran and the world from these Islamofascists and end the nuclear and ballistic threats and yes removing the enriched uranium. This is what unconditional surrounder means.

[John Stone]

11 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

The final objective is a regime change and liberate Iran and the world from these Islamofascists and end the nuclear and ballistic threats and yes removing the enriched uranium. This is what unconditional surrounder means.

Unconditional surrender is when a party ceases resistance and submits entirely to the victor without negotiation re: promises or assurances.

The surrendering party has NO leverage - no negotiation. 

I doubt we'll see anything like what occurred in Tokyo Bay, Sept 2nd, 1945 aboard the USS Missouri?

Yes, the initial objective was recovering the 'yellow cake' and enriched uranium

We'll see and I wish 'em luck - hopefully the attacking force knows exactly where it has been distributed?

Surprised the idea of a dirty bomb or a 4th protocol hasn't come up. 

In any event a gun-type fission weapon is nuc 101.