August1991 Posted Sunday at 06:41 AM Report Posted Sunday at 06:41 AM (edited) In Fall 2026, the CAQ will not win re-election. I suspect that it will be a PQ majority. (The Liberals have no chance... ) Alberta? If anything, some people now prefer a referendum. And we have a federal government with a very, very ambitious clueless PM - but a bare minority. Hmmm. Edited Sunday at 07:00 AM by August1991 Quote
CdnFox Posted Sunday at 04:08 PM Report Posted Sunday at 04:08 PM 9 hours ago, August1991 said: In Fall 2026, the CAQ will not win re-election. I suspect that it will be a PQ majority. (The Liberals have no chance... ) Alberta? If anything, some people now prefer a referendum. And we have a federal government with a very, very ambitious clueless PM - but a bare minority. Hmmm. Interesting times Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
August1991 Posted yesterday at 01:47 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 01:47 AM Carney has a razor-thin majority - dependent on the NPD (look at the members) or BQ. For votes, he needs a good whip. Unlike Mulroney or Chretien, Carney is not a good caucus leader. Quote
August1991 Posted yesterday at 02:32 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 02:32 AM I have always thought that a US President without partisan Senate support is a goner. And a Canadian federal PM without caucus support is a loser. Quote
CdnFox Posted yesterday at 04:05 AM Report Posted yesterday at 04:05 AM 2 hours ago, August1991 said: Carney has a razor-thin majority - dependent on the NPD (look at the members) or BQ. For votes, he needs a good whip. Unlike Mulroney or Chretien, Carney is not a good caucus leader. No, he has a strong minority. He does not have a majority. Agreed though that he doesn't seem to be a very good caucus leader Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
August1991 Posted yesterday at 07:20 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 07:20 AM 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: No, he has a strong minority. He does not have a majority. Agreed though that he doesn't seem to be a very good caucus leader Correct. Razor-thin majority. ==== Have you read Crosbie's book No Holds Barred? In 1971 or so, he wanted to defeat Smallwood - a member from Labrador had the deciding vote. Such is politics. Carney is forced to do such deals now. Quote
August1991 Posted yesterday at 07:31 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 07:31 AM I saw Mulroney in caucus. In his office, among cabinet ministers. In public, in private, he was a master. I saw Chretien in private and random crowds. He was remarkable. Chretien liked meeting people, kids in particular. Quote
August1991 Posted yesterday at 08:08 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 08:08 AM Meech Lake 1995 According to the ever predictable CBC's Andrew Coyne and so-called Quebec expert Chantal Hebert: "Let's see." ==== Disagree. Carney did not win a clear majority. The PQ will win in 2026. Alberta will hold a referendum. (It will lose - but the vote will be higher than Quebec's 1980). Think: In 1980, 40% of people in Quebec wanted a sovereign state. Quote
CdnFox Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 12 hours ago, August1991 said: Correct. Razor-thin majority. ==== Are you being deliberately stupid? Is this like your "kryptonite" routine? There's no majority, razor thin or otherwise. It's a minority. You make yourself look like a tard when you insist things are true when you know they're not. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.