Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The beat part of this video is the reactions of Gill to her answers. "Ummm....yes you did." Just cracks me up every time.

 

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
6 hours ago, robosmith said:

The real clown involved was MTG and all her LIES.

Why are you so concerned with everyone else's lies when you've been caught lying so many times?

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

The real clown involved was MTG and all her LIES.

Sure... we are not paying MTG to run a news network with government funds. 

 

Defund NPR. 

 

 

 

Posted

What a smarmy little shit that guy is. Gross.

I'm sure he's very proud of himself for ambushing someone who has been on the job about a year with years-old lines that may or may not be excerpted (he's not trustworthy) from the thousands of hours of programming each year. As if it's remotely productive reasonable.

Not surprised to see him celebrated here though. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Hodad said:

What a smarmy little shit that guy is. Gross.

I'm sure he's very proud of himself for ambushing someone who has been on the job about a year with years-old lines that may or may not be excerpted (he's not trustworthy) from the thousands of hours of programming each year. As if it's remotely productive reasonable.

Not surprised to see him celebrated here though. 

OMG, how dishonest can you be?

She posted these things on Twitter at the time or said them in clearly reviewable TED Talks. 

You think it is "ambushing" someone with their own words and things they have said now? ROFL

This is not Media Matters that lifted a 10-second out-of-context clip from a conservative show. 

You are doing what you folks on the left always do though... attack the source, ignore the facts. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, User said:

OMG, how dishonest can you be?

She posted these things on Twitter at the time or said them in clearly reviewable TED Talks. 

You think it is "ambushing" someone with their own words and things they have said now? ROFL

This is not Media Matters that lifted a 10-second out-of-context clip from a conservative show. 

You are doing what you folks on the left always do though... attack the source, ignore the facts. 

That guy attacking her with years old ALLEGATIONS unrelated to the hearing on her time at NPR IS NOT FACTS.

But just keep digging your hole from which you'll never emerge unscathed. LMAO

Edited by robosmith
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, User said:

OMG, how dishonest can you be?

She posted these things on Twitter at the time or said them in clearly reviewable TED Talks. 

You think it is "ambushing" someone with their own words and things they have said now? ROFL

This is not Media Matters that lifted a 10-second out-of-context clip from a conservative show. 

You are doing what you folks on the left always do though... attack the source, ignore the facts. 

Rule #1

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 hours ago, robosmith said:

That guy attacking her with years old ALLEGATIONS unrelated to the hearing on her time at NPR IS NOT FACTS.

But just keep digging your hole from which you'll never emerge unscathed. LMAO

What a perfect example of rule number five. You consider facts to be a positive term. These facts fit in as a negative for your viewpoint. Therefore, they can't be facts in your mind. But they are facts. They are facts about her viewpoints that she is bringing to the organization. An organization that has been accused of having a bias towards one side of the political spectrum. Reviewing her statements to determine whether or not she holds a political bias is not a lie or irrelevant.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
16 hours ago, robosmith said:

That guy attacking her with years old ALLEGATIONS unrelated to the hearing on her time at NPR IS NOT FACTS.

But just keep digging your hole from which you'll never emerge unscathed. LMAO

It is not an "ALLEGATION" to quote what someone said and being years old doesn't change anything. 

Although given how much you lie on this forum daily, I can understand why you don't think something even a day old is relevant. 

 

 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...