U.S. Justice Department Launches Investigation of University of California Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

[gatomontes99]

Quote

The Federal Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism announced that the Justice Department has opened a civil pattern or practice investigation into the University of California (UC) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The investigation will assess whether UC has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, religion and national origin against its professors, staff and other employees by allowing an Antisemitic hostile work environment to exist on its campuses.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-justice-department-launches-investigation-university-california-under-title-vii-civil

UC f'd around and now they are finding out. It's about time a political party applied discrimination laws uniformly.

[robosmith]

And violated a LONG STANDING DoJ POLICY of AGAINST publicly announcing investigations BEFORE ANY INDICTMENTS are made.

Basically just BRAZEN attempt to tar an institution which did nothing more than SEVERAL OTHER UNIVERSITIES.

[User]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

And violated a LONG STANDING DoJ POLICY of AGAINST publicly announcing investigations BEFORE ANY INDICTMENTS are made.

Basically just BRAZEN attempt to tar an institution which did nothing more than SEVERAL OTHER UNIVERSITIES.

This is some obvious baloney. Where do you get that there is any such longstanding DOJ policy?

I swear, you will just make up any lie and not give one damn about it. 

 

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland Announces Investigation of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and the Minneapolis Police Department

https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/attorney-general-merrick-b-garland-announces-investigation-city-minneapolis-minnesota-and

[robosmith]

18 hours ago, User said:

This is some obvious baloney. Where do you get that there is any such longstanding DOJ policy?

In general, the Department of Justice does not publicly announce investigations or investigative findings. There are several reasons for this policy. Announcing an investigation of some civil or criminal violations could make it more difficult to obtain witness cooperation or gather evidence.Oct 18, 2018

 

When Does the Division Announce Investigations?

Department of Justice (.gov)

https://www.justice.gov › crt › when-does-division-ann...

FBI investigated by IG over pre-election decisions on Clinton email

Quote

Law enforcement authorities, including the FBI, by custom do not disclose information about investigations that do not end in criminal charges.

If the review finds evidence of misconduct, any officials involved would be referred for disciplinary action.

In a statement, Comey said the FBI would cooperate fully and he was "grateful" to Horowitz for the probe.

"He is professional and independent and ... I hope very much he is able to share his conclusions and observations with the public because everyone will benefit from thoughtful evaluation and transparency regarding this matter."

The "obvious baloney" is YOURS.

18 hours ago, User said:

I swear, you will just make up any lie and not give one damn about it. 

You should stop swearing about your IGNORANCE

 

 

[User]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You should stop swearing about your IGNORANCE

In general. 

LOL, learn to read your own source. 

[robosmith]

12 hours ago, User said:

In general. 

LOL, learn to read your own source. 

You should learn to read.

"Law enforcement authorities, including the FBI, by custom do not disclose information about investigations that do not end in criminal charges."

Because the mere announcement of an investigation casts an unfair damage to reputation on the entity being investigated since they are INNOCENT until proven guilty. Duh

Of course why would you care about unfair damage to anyone's reputation, right?

[gatomontes99]

Didn't the DOJ announce all its investigations into Trump well before they brought any of the weak ass charges they eventually brought?

[User]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

Of course why would you care about unfair damage to anyone's reputation, right?

I can read just fine, you can't.  That is a statement about revealing an investigation AFTER it does not end in charges. 

 

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Didn't the DOJ announce all its investigations into Trump well before they brought any of the weak ass charges they eventually brought?

Yeah, and I even highlighted where Garland was announcing investigations during the Biden administration. 

 

[Deluge]

On 3/5/2025 at 12:17 PM, gatomontes99 said:

UC f'd around and now they are finding out. It's about time a political party applied discrimination laws uniformly.

The entire state needs an enema.