Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

From a Chinese paper of all places

"Meanwhile, Bush indicated on Tuesday that he wants to show Canada that the U.S. "genuinely cares" by working to resolve issues such as softwood lumber. "

I doubt that there wil be anything announced about an actual resolution at the summit. Another source indicated that the outcome from the summit would likely be the appointment of a high level rep from each side with the specific task of banging out something, and soon - and reporting directly to Bush and Harper.. It seems to me that this will work, but Canadians cannot reasonably expect to see a 100%, take-no-prisoners win for Canada.

The government should do something.

Posted

From what I have heard in the news its just a bunch a bunch of lipservice about wanting to get it done from the leaders and nothing substantive is on the horizon as the major stumbling block is still the return of the illegal tariffs charged on Canadian softwood.

"If in passing, you never encounter anything that offends you, you are not living in a free society."

- Rt. Hon. Kim Campbell -

β€œIn many respects, the government needs fewer rules, but rules that are consistently applied.” - Sheila Fraser, Former Auditor General.

Posted

Who are we negotiating for in this dispute? Emmerson is in a clear conflict of interest here, but no one seems to care. His former employer [Canfor] has just acquired New South Companies Inc. giving it a profitable U.S. timber producer, which is also an opponent of the Canadian industry in the softwood lumber dispute.

IMO this dispute is only serving to consolidate the industry into the most powerful conglomerates. Tariffs still stand for smaller companies while the big fish play both sides unaffected.

Posted
Who are we negotiating for in this dispute? Emmerson is in a clear conflict of interest here, but no one seems to care. His former employer [Canfor] has just acquired New South Companies Inc. giving it a profitable U.S. timber producer, which is also an opponent of the Canadian industry in the softwood lumber dispute.

IMO this dispute is only serving to consolidate the industry into the most powerful conglomerates. Tariffs still stand for smaller companies while the big fish play both sides unaffected.

What the heck are you all talking about, we have a soft wood settlement, all Bush has to do is honour it.

Posted

Not exactly. There has been a WTO ruling in the past saying Canadians subsidize their industry through artifically low stumpage fees. The American arugment does have some value.

RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game")

--

Posted

This dispute has been going on for years. I do not see a solution on this any time soon. Even with the WTO ruling in favour for Canada on several occassions nothing is resolved.

Wait about 3 more years. MAYBE we will see something on it.

Posted

With the mid term elections coming in November, we won't see any movement except lip service till the spring of 2007..maybe. By then we maybe in an early election ourselves so we wait again.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,016
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    eninn
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...