Crime Is Not Down...That Data Is Incomplete

[gatomontes99]

In 2019, 89% of agencies covering 97% of the population submitted data, but by 2021, that coverage plummeted to less than 63% of departments overseeing just 65% of the population. Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City all failed to submit crime data. To increase participation, the FBI relaxed the NIBRS requirement in 2022, allowing agencies to report via the legacy system.    But many other cities, such as St. Louis, which had transitioned to the new method, still struggle to comply and submit partial or faulty data. The FBI compensates by relying more heavily on “estimation,” or informed guesswork, to fill in the gaps and produce aggregated data.

What we are seeing is a system in transition, so data is incomplete. However, Joe's handlers, knowing the data is wrong, are trying to use it to convince you Joe did something positive. He didn't. It is a lie.

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

In 2019, 89% of agencies covering 97% of the population submitted data, but by 2021, that coverage plummeted to less than 63% of departments overseeing just 65% of the population. Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City all failed to submit crime data. To increase participation, the FBI relaxed the NIBRS requirement in 2022, allowing agencies to report via the legacy system.    But many other cities, such as St. Louis, which had transitioned to the new method, still struggle to comply and submit partial or faulty data. The FBI compensates by relying more heavily on “estimation,” or informed guesswork, to fill in the gaps and produce aggregated data.

What we are seeing is a system in transition, so data is incomplete. However, Joe's handlers, knowing the data is wrong, are trying to use it to convince you Joe did something positive. He didn't. It is a lie.

A good way to expose these wokeaholics is YouTubers. They are regularly documenting the decline in their cities. 

[gatomontes99]

7 minutes ago, Deluge said:

A good way to expose these wokeaholics is YouTubers. They are regularly documenting the decline in their cities. 

And getting banned or shadow banned. Your best bets now are Rumble and X.

[Deluge]

26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

And getting banned or shadow banned. Your best bets now are Rumble and X.

Good point. I've been noticing that. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

In 2019, 89% of agencies covering 97% of the population submitted data, but by 2021, that coverage plummeted to less than 63% of departments overseeing just 65% of the population. Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City all failed to submit crime data. To increase participation, the FBI relaxed the NIBRS requirement in 2022, allowing agencies to report via the legacy system.    But many other cities, such as St. Louis, which had transitioned to the new method, still struggle to comply and submit partial or faulty data. The FBI compensates by relying more heavily on “estimation,” or informed guesswork, to fill in the gaps and produce aggregated data.

What we are seeing is a system in transition, so data is incomplete. However, Joe's handlers, knowing the data is wrong, are trying to use it to convince you Joe did something positive. He didn't. It is a lie.

UNKNOWN. AKA NOT a lie.

Incomplete data is ONLY IGNORANCE, not particular FACTS.

[impartialobserver]

Even if data is incomplete.. that does not tell you that crime is up or down. I am ok with incomplete. I am not one to fill in the blanks. 

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

UNKNOWN. AKA NOT a lie.

Incomplete data is ONLY IGNORANCE, not particular FACTS.

It's a lie. Because they know they don't know yet they present it as a fact.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

It's a lie. Because they know they don't know yet they present it as a fact.

Then you're lying cause you DON'T KNOW it's not true.