Trump nondisclosure Agreements illegal and invalid as per Jessica Dennison v. Trump Organization

[Caswell Thomas]

Anyone read ALL of Judge Engoron's Order in the Civil Trial that cost him colossal bucks...or just the amount and reports of Trump's anger?   See the Findings and Order and read #15.....Jessica Dennison v. Trump Organization.  Ms. Dennison over a 7 year period, acting as Pro Se..i.e. as herself in Court, not represented by an attorney, took on the while Trump Organization and Trump himself when he tried to threaten her with a lawsuit if she disclosed anything she may have observed, heard, or seen written by any member of said organization and Trump himself.

Despite threats and bullying, demands and outright lies he made up about her to force her to obey his orders and not disclose said information even and especially to any member of law enforcement that the Trump Organization dish' t approve of , and Trump having high price attorneys defending him and trying to force her to legally comply with said Agreement, the COURT found for Ms. Dennison.  The Court determined that all such Agreements by ANY entity, Organization or person HAS NO MERIT and is Non Binding and Invalid.

IN the Civil Court Case which awarded over $354 million dollars against Trump, his Organization and each of his two sons, and which has been able until now to prevent a lot of witnesses from testifying who worked for the Trump Organization or Trump himself directly or his family by demanding compliance with said Agreement(s)...such as Alan Weisselberg....and Cohen, and...the list is huge....all the people he forced to sign these invalid agreements can now, legally testify against Trump, and even sue him separately for forcing them TO SIGN such agreements as they essentially take away your rights and enslave you to Trump and/or his family and/or Trump Organization and enslaving  anyone is a violation of Law. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Caswell Thomas said:

Anyone read ALL of Judge Engoron's Order in the Civil Trial that cost him colossal bucks...or just the amount and reports of Trump's anger?   See the Findings and Order and read #15.....Jessica Dennison v. Trump Organization.  Ms. Dennison over a 7 year period, acting as Pro Se..i.e. as herself in Court, not represented by an attorney, took on the while Trump Organization and Trump himself when he tried to threaten her with a lawsuit if she disclosed anything she may have observed, heard, or seen written by any member of said organization and Trump himself.

Despite threats and bullying, demands and outright lies he made up about her to force her to obey his orders and not disclose said information even and especially to any member of law enforcement that the Trump Organization dish' t approve of , and Trump having high price attorneys defending him and trying to force her to legally comply with said Agreement, the COURT found for Ms. Dennison.  The Court determined that all such Agreements by ANY entity, Organization or person HAS NO MERIT and is Non Binding and Invalid.

IN the Civil Court Case which awarded over $354 million dollars against Trump, his Organization and each of his two sons, and which has been able until now to prevent a lot of witnesses from testifying who worked for the Trump Organization or Trump himself directly or his family by demanding compliance with said Agreement(s)...such as Alan Weisselberg....and Cohen, and...the list is huge....all the people he forced to sign these invalid agreements can now, legally testify against Trump, and even sue him separately for forcing them TO SIGN such agreements as they essentially take away your rights and enslave you to Trump and/or his family and/or Trump Organization and enslaving  anyone is a violation of Law. 

FYI, that was NOT an "awarded" it is a "penalized."

[Fluffypants]

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

FYI, that was NOT an "awarded" it is a "penalized."

I find it funny as hell that the whole thing is backfiring on New York, they are begging businesses not to leave.

Of course it is telling that they essentially are saying we did it to Trump because we don't like him but we won't do it to you.

[Deluge]

18 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

I find it funny as hell that the whole thing is backfiring on New York, they are begging businesses not to leave.

Of course it is telling that they essentially are saying we did it to Trump because we don't like him but we won't do it to you.

These Marxist psychopaths are hostile to American values in general. They can't help themselves. 

[Caswell Thomas]

16 hours ago, robosmith said:

FYI, that was NOT an "awarded" it is a "penalized."

Got it...my legal background was in a different field of legal where Findings by a Court were given instead of as in Criminal Court, etc. where different terms are essentially synonyms for similar effects in court documents.