Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, West said:

The senate was controlled by people as ill upstairs as Hillary. And according to several news clippings at the time a guy manafort knew gave the polling data. Not that it's reliable... the news media has said alot of bat shiy crazy nonsense over the past few years...

So that's a no, you never read the REPUBLICAN LED Senate Intel Committee report

 

Quote

Prior to joining the Trump Campaign in March 2016 and continuing throughout his
time 6n the Campaign, Manafort directly and indirectly communicated with Kilimnik, Deripaska,
and the pro-Russian oligarchs in Ukraine. On numerous occasions, Manafort sought to secretly
share internal Campaign information with Kilimnik. The Committee was unable to reliably
determine why Manafort shared sensitive internal polling data or Campaign strategy with
Kilimnik or with whom Kilimnik further shared that information. The Committee had limited
insight into Kilimnik's communications with Manafort and into Kilimnik's communications with
other individuals connected to Russian influence operations, all of whom used communications
security practices. The Committee obtained some information suggesting Kilimnik may have
been connected to the GRU's hack and leak operation targeting the 2016 U.S. election.

Beginning while he was Campaign chairman and continuing until at least 2018, Manafor
discussed with Kilimnik a peace plan for eastern Ukraine that benefitted the Kremlin.


After the election, Manafort continued to coordinate with
Russian persons, particularly Kilimnik and other individuals close to Deripaska, in an effort to
undertake activities on their behalf. Manafort worked with Kilimnik starting in 2016 on
narratives that sought to undermine evidence that Russia interfered in .the 2016 U.S. election.

That is textbook collusion whether you understand it or not. Talk about "ill."

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So that's a no, you never read the REPUBLICAN LED Senate Intel Committee report

 

That is textbook collusion whether you understand it or not. Talk about "ill."

"A longtime associate of former President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign chief Paul Manafort gave Russian intelligence agencies "sensitive information"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/04/15/trump-campaign-chief-paul-manafort-employee-kilimnik-gave-russia-election-data.html

 

You folks can't even keep up with your own conspiracy theories

So basically you admit the fbi never investigated any real crimes only served as a publicly funded opposition research firm on behalf of democrats.

. Talk about rigged elections

Edited by West
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, West said:

"A longtime associate of former President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign chief Paul Manafort gave Russian intelligence agencies "sensitive information"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/04/15/trump-campaign-chief-paul-manafort-employee-kilimnik-gave-russia-election-data.html

 

You folks can't even keep up with your own conspiracy theories

Senate Intel Committee REPORT:

Quote

On numerous occasions, Manafort sought to secretly share internal Campaign information with Kilimnik.

Sorry the actual report trumps ANY news source. Esp YOUR BROKEN LINK.

But thanks for confirming that Kilimnik shared the data with Russian Intelligence.

Edited by robosmith
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Senate Intel Committee REPORT:

Sorry the actual report trumps ANY news source. Esp YOUR BROKEN LINK.

But thanks for confirming that Kilimnik shared the data with Russian Intelligence.

First of all the link works just fine. Nice try. 

Secondly you are again missing key talking points of the delusion. Manafort didn't share it with kilminak.. a person he knew did.. for all we know Hillary was running Russian spies into the Trump Campaign.. seems more likely given the following:

1. The lady who was involved in the Trump tower meeting was on the payroll of Fusion GPS, the firm Crooked used to spy on the Trump Campaign and produce a report full of lies. And 

2. The vice presidents son, Hunter Biden, was getting an unusually large sum of cash to sit on an energy board of a Russian energy firm 

3. Manafort worked with Podesta's brother for many years. 

Edited by West
Posted
18 minutes ago, West said:

First of all the link works just fine. Nice try. 

Secondly you are again missing key talking points of the delusion. Manafort didn't share it with kilminak.. a person he knew did.. for all we know Hillary was running Russian spies into the Trump Campaign.. seems more likely given the following:

Your cite:

Quote
  • A longtime associate of former President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign chief Paul Manafort gave Russian intelligence agencies “sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy” during the election that year, the U.S. Treasury Department said.
  • Manafort’s associate, Konstantin Kilimnik, “also sought to promote the narrative that Ukraine, not Russia, had interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election,” the department said Thursday as the Biden administration announced new sanctions on Russia, Kilimnik and others.
  • Those sanctions relate in part to Russia’s alleged effort to affect the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

Says Manafort's associate WAS Kilimnik

 

18 minutes ago, West said:

1. The lady who was involved in the Trump tower meeting was on the payroll of Fusion GPS, the firm Crooked used to spy on the Trump Campaign and produce a report full of lies. And 

You mean Natalia Veselnitskaya the RUSSIAN LAWYER who was close to the Kremlin?

Lawyer Who Was Said to Have Dirt on Clinton Had Closer Ties to Kremlin Than She Let On

Quote

But newly released emails show that in at least one instance two years earlier, the lawyer, Natalia V. Veselnitskaya, worked hand in glove with Russia’s chief legal office to thwart a Justice Department civil fraud case against a well-connected Russian firm.

Ms. Veselnitskaya also appears to have recanted her earlier denials of Russian government ties. During an interview to be broadcast Friday by NBC News, she acknowledged that she was not merely a private lawyer but a source of information for a top Kremlin official, Yuri Y. Chaika, the prosecutor general.

 

18 minutes ago, West said:

2. The vice presidents son, Hunter Biden, was getting an unusually large sum of cash to sit on an energy board of a Russian energy firm 

You mean Ukranian firm Burisma? So what? That has NOTHING to do with Hillary and the 2016 election.

18 minutes ago, West said:

3. Manafort worked with Podesta's brother for many years. 

So what? He worked for oligarch Oleg Deripaska for many years, too.

And Putin puppet Janukovych.

Nice TRY. NOT.

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your cite:

Says Manafort's associate WAS Kilimnik

 

You mean Natalia Veselnitskaya the RUSSIAN LAWYER who was close to the Kremlin?

Lawyer Who Was Said to Have Dirt on Clinton Had Closer Ties to Kremlin Than She Let On

 

You mean Ukranian firm Burisma? So what? That has NOTHING to do with Hillary and the 2016 election.

So what? He worked for oligarch Oleg Deripaska for many years, too.

And Putin puppet Janukovych.

Nice TRY. NOT.

 

The Russian lawyer that was on fusions payroll.. yes.. and Manafort worked with Tony Podesta.. 

Not to mention Hunter Biden raking in big on the payroll of a corrupt Russian energy firm

 

All these Democrat connections to Russia makes yoh wonder if they were in fact the ones getting handsy with Russia

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, West said:

The Russian lawyer that was on fusions payroll.. yes.. and Manafort worked with Tony Podesta.. 

Not to mention Hunter Biden raking in big on the payroll of a corrupt Russian energy firm

 

All these Democrat connections to Russia makes yoh wonder if they were in fact the ones getting handsy with Russia

Fusion is NOT "Democratic official." nor politician.

And Burisma is Ukrainian, NOT Russian. And Hunter is NOT a politician NOR an employee of one.

So what if Manafort worked with TONY? He's NOT a Democratic official like his BROTHER was.

Don't strain your back with all your STRETCHING.

Three plus strikes and YOU'RE OUT. ?

Edited by robosmith
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Fusion is NOT "Democratic official." nor politician.

And Burisma is Ukrainian, NOT Russian. And Hunter is NOT a politician NOR an employee of one.

So what if Manafort worked with TONY? He's NOT a Democratic official like his BROTHER was.

Don't strain your back with all your STRETCHING.

Three plus strikes and YOU'RE OUT. ?

Fusion was the firm used by Hillary Clinton to dig up dirt..  if you want to say Trump colluded because Manafort knew a Russian once and Sessions' job was meeting with ambassadors from foreign countries, you should also apply it to your side.

You obviously refuse to connect the dots. The US system is built on selling access to politicians thru family members. There's no other good explanation for why Hunter Biden was working for a Russian oligarch

Edited by West
Posted
49 minutes ago, West said:

Fusion was the firm used by Hillary Clinton to dig up dirt..  if you want to say Trump colluded because Manafort knew a Russian once and Sessions' job was meeting with ambassadors from foreign countries, you should also apply it to your side.

You obviously refuse to connect the dots. The US system is built on selling access to politicians thru family members. There's no other good explanation for why Hunter Biden was working for a Russian oligarch

Just because you IMAGINE the "US system is built on selling access to" something, does NOT make it true.

The fact is, any such corruption is totally dependent on the people involved, and there's no evidence Joe Biden did ANY favors for Burisma or Ukraine.

If Burisma's owners want to GAMBLE their money on Hunter's connections delivering them favors, that is THEIR BUSINESS, not PROOF that anything unethical HAPPENED.

You need to prove your ASSUMPTIONS. Until then: ?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...