Jump to content

Jurisdictional Democracy


Recommended Posts

Currently, all nation-states utilize single monopoly government to rule all policy jurisdictions typically over single ideological lines.

This is evidently detrimental to citizens as it is not logical that one party or ideology would perform competently over all jurisdictions.

Monopoly government has almost always been the default form of government but since the advent of democracy the option to elect jurisdictional governments has not been explored.

In the example of an automobile manufacturer, it would not be expected that an automobile company would manufacture the car and the tires, own and run the delivery trucks and trains to dealerships, maintain the roads the car would drive on, manage drivers' licenses, as well as manage the automobile financing. Any competent CEO would break up such a company into jurisdictions in order for them to function competently.

Why is it then that citizens continue with monopoly government and expect ideological political parties to manage jurisdictions as diverse as the military, health and education systems and economic policy. Even with all governments being departmentalized, executive branches of governments adhere to one head of state and narrow ideology.

Would nation-states not be better off electing separate councils for defense, economics and social services?

Edited by 500channelsurfer
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canada's Head of State is non-ideological. The Ministry is made up of people with varied ideologies, even though they belong to the same political party. They receive input from the opposition parties as well as their constituents. They also receive advice from the professional public servants in their various ministries.

So, it is not a monopoly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the realm of public governance there is one government. One Head of State whether ideological or not is not what I am getting at.

In the private sector there is more than one economic sector. Companies that sell boots do not also sell spark plugs. There is competition among both boot and spark plug manufacturers, respectively.

The public sector could be divided similarly. There could be Head of state for Health Care as well as a different Head of State for military, and this would better ensure that more competent people manage each public sector, as they would be more specialized in each field.

Edited by 500channelsurfer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • SkyHigh earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Proficient
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...