Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I doubt that Pocket would be very worried. It is merely M.B. repeating the same lies as he has uttered a dozen times.

They are lies because he knows better having been corrected and informed of the facts over and over again. I doubt that anyone has the interest to do it again.

So why not do something more productive instead of wasting your time with this LGF reject? It's like putting pants on a pig: the pig gets mad and you end up covered in shit.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
There was no threat to America from Iraq,...

Oh but there was. Saddam ran a terrorist haven, ....

You went to a lot of effort to refute my comment, but only after carefully taking it out of context.

The full comment read "There was no threat to America from Iraq, at least not from the Iraq military".

More obfuscation???

If there is no threat coming from the country's military but merely from the terrorists that flourish there .... I wouldn't use my military to quash them.

These problems aren't new. If I were President I would be have been prepared by now by letting the anti-terrorist terrorists flourish in my country, then let THEM deal with this phenomena.

G.W. Bush had no choice this time around, but I hope he is listening!

Posted
It's like putting pants on a pig: the pig gets mad and you end up covered in shit.

That's what I like about professional comedians. They can sense when the line they used was only mildly amusing and don't use it twice.

If you ignore him, hopefully he will go back to where he came from - the Democratic Underground.

"Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebatâ„¢ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005.

"Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.

Posted
That's what I like about professional comedians. They can sense when the line they used was only mildly amusing and don't use it twice

Well, there's just so much pig shit flying around here these days, I just kinda thought it was appropos. I'm curious, though: who did you used to be?

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted

PocketRocket:

You went to a lot of effort to refute my comment, but only after carefully taking it out of context.

The full comment read "There was no threat to America from Iraq, at least not from the Iraq military".

More obfuscation???

What do you mean out of context? You stated that Iraq was no threat to the USA - at least militarily. Apparently in your view, sponsoring terrorism is A-OK. You can rant about "more obfuscation" all you want, but it does not change what you wrote.

Well, yes; that several nations within the UN disapprove of the methods of the current adminiistrations of USA and Britain.

This statement sums up the morals of the far left: The US and the UK are bad because the dictators of the world said so!

Reminds of your previous claims that the US enforced the UN resolutions "illegally" because they didn't get France's permission.

Let me guess, you think they should not be allowed to speak at all???

You guessed correctly. Thugs, dictators and despots should not have a world platform to speak from.

And speaking of over-the-top rhetoric...

Translation: You got me so I don't want to play anymore.

Like I pointed out earlier in this same thread, the guy you cite in your link in the opening post does exactly the same thing by saying "If the American left and its media sympathizers want someone to blame for our combat losses, they should begin with themselves."

Accusing the left of "exploiting the dead", while doing the same thing, IN THE SAME ARTICLE.

How hypocritical can you get???

Get over it, MONTY. Both sides use the dead as political currency.

One side by saying they should still be alive.

The other side accusing the first of being responsible simply because of their disagreement with the war.

Pot, kettle.

What are you talking about? Are you accusing the Republicans of exploiting the dead? You don't even make sense. Please try to in the future.

"Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebatâ„¢ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005.

"Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.

Posted
Should I pin my hopes on an Oscar?
Well thank you. And I'd like to thank my producer, and the academy, and.....

Hey, PR, we can go to the Oscar after party together!! :lol:

For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.

Nelson Mandela

Posted
Should I pin my hopes on an Oscar?
Well thank you. And I'd like to thank my producer, and the academy, and.....

Hey, PR, we can go to the Oscar after party together!! :lol:

And party with Michael Moore after the show. You can have a couple of drinks and discuss the Freedom Fighters, the Minute Men, who are slaughtering Iraqis every day in their quest to "free" the Iraqis from the tyranny of democracy. ;)

"Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebatâ„¢ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005.

"Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.

Posted
1) What do you mean out of context? 

2) What are you talking about?  Are you accusing the Republicans of exploiting the dead? 

1) Exactly what I said. First time around you removed the "military threat" from my quote.

2) Yes. Read the article you cited in your first post. Read the entire paragraph you quoted from my post.

You guessed correctly.  Thugs, dictators and despots should not have a world platform to speak from.

So much for a free and democratic exchange of ideas.

I guess that's only for people you approve of, ie; Bush supporters.

You don't even make sense.  Please try to in the future.

Try working on your comprehension skills.

As for the rest, can't be bothered, more trolling.

I need another coffee

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,833
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    maria orsic
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Majikman earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • VanidaCKP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • maria orsic earned a badge
      First Post
    • Majikman earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • oops earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...