hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 9 minutes ago, Wilber said: The aircraft used on 9/11 were at least 10 years old at the time, their engines would have undergone continuous modifications and upgrades during their history. The engines on that aircraft would not be the ones with which it was originally delivered. In fact, new aircraft are subject to engine staggering where new engines are removed and replaced with those having different overhaul times so that airlines are not stuck with having all its engines replaced at the same time. To say that one bent and busted part confirms a particular engine is a real stretch. The only way to confirm what parts were used in the engines on those aircraft would be through their maintenance and overhaul records. Nice theory, Wilber, and typical of you folks not a scrap of evidence. Why do you think this huge discrepancy has not been addressed by any US government body? Why no US media? Why no MLW members? Why nobody, ever? It was raised long long ago. Quote
capricorn Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 11 minutes ago, Omni said: The spelling "error" was intentional. And quite appropriate I must say. Quote "We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers
Omni Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, hot enough said: Why do you think this huge discrepancy Only a die hard conspiracy theorist knowing nothing of turbofan engines would call one cooling duct assembly a "huge discrepancy" Quote
Omni Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, capricorn said: And quite appropriate I must say. Ha ha, you saw what I did there. Quote
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Omni said: Only a die hard conspiracy theorist knowing nothing of turbofan engines would call one cooling duct assembly a "huge discrepancy" So explain it. [another song and dance routine coming from Omni] Edited June 20, 2017 by hot enough Quote
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 14 minutes ago, capricorn said: And quite appropriate I must say. Can you answer these questions, capricorn, even one? 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum? Quote
Omni Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 10 minutes ago, hot enough said: The only way to confirm what parts were used in the engines on those aircraft would be through their maintenance and overhaul records. And I know I've been held aloft by two engines, same manufacturer,but with completely different dash #'s. Quote
capricorn Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: Can you answer these questions, capricorn, even one? 1. Do you deny 2. Do you deny 3. Do you deny Deny deny deny. I already informed you that I am a 9/11 conspiracy theory denier. Why do you keep bugging me with these denial questions? Besides, you're in the wrong thread. This thread is about the Grenfell Tower fire. Quote "We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers
Wilber Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 16 minutes ago, hot enough said: Nice theory, Wilber, and typical of you folks not a scrap of evidence. Why do you think this huge discrepancy has not been addressed by any US government body? Why no US media? Why no MLW members? Why nobody, ever? It was raised long long ago. Because to people who know what they are talking about, it isn't a discrepancy. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, capricorn said: Deny deny deny. I already informed you that I am a 9/11 conspiracy theory denier. Why do you keep bugging me with these denial questions? Besides, you're in the wrong thread. This thread is about the Grenfell Tower fire. I'm not asking you about "9/11 conspiracy theory denier" issues. I am asking you about factual things that exist in our society, items that exist in 911 museums. Can you not even address reality? 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum? Quote
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, Wilber said: Because to people who know what they are talking about, it isn't a discrepancy. Still no evidence. Why do you folks have such an aversion to evidence? Evidence to you all is like kryptonite to superman. Quote
Omni Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, hot enough said: Still no evidence. Why do you folks have such an aversion to evidence? Evidence to you all is like kryptonite to superman. Or nanu-nanu to HE. hahaha Quote
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 9 minutes ago, Omni said: Or nanu-nanu to HE. hahaha I'm being overwhelmed by evidence from the expert "pilots"/the science deniers/the anti-truthers. Quote
Omni Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, hot enough said: I'm being overwhelmed by evidence from the expert "pilots"/the science deniers/the anti-truthers. Apparently you have been overwhelmed by the latter, you should take the opportunity to be edified by the former. Quote
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Omni said: Apparently you have been overwhelmed by the latter, you should take the opportunity to be edified by the former. Still no evidence from the "pilot". No evidence from anyone. Where did Boges go when his US government conspiracy theory nonsense was shot down? The same place omni, wilber, capricorn, dop, ... go when their nonsense is shot down, to inane tangents. The following questions are all about straight forward reality events. Why are all you honest people so afraid of these six easy questions? 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum? Edited June 20, 2017 by hot enough Quote
Omni Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, hot enough said: evidence from the "pilot". Yes technical background is helpful. Quote
Wilber Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 30 minutes ago, Omni said: And I know I've been held aloft by two engines, same manufacturer,but with completely different dash #'s. Yup, intermix is a PITA but not uncommon. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 7 minutes ago, Omni said: Yes technical background is helpful. That has not ever been evident in any of your posts. Still no evidence from omni or anyone else associated with the US government conspiracy theory. Why do you continue to embarrass yourselves and make a mockery of MLW? Quote
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, Wilber said: Yup, intermix is a PITA but not uncommon. Still no evidence from Wilber or anyone else associated with the US government conspiracy theory. Quote
Wilber Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 25 minutes ago, hot enough said: Still no evidence from Wilber or anyone else associated with the US government conspiracy theory. Still waiting for evidence of a conspiracy. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Wilber said: Still waiting for evidence of a conspiracy. Exactly, Wilber. How come the US government conspiracy theory supporters can't provide any evidence substantiating their rock solid US government conspiracy theory showing the very conspiracy they allege took place? It's crazy. You all believe in a fiction for which you can't provide any evidence. Edited June 20, 2017 by hot enough Quote
Omni Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, hot enough said: Exactly, Wilber. How come the US government conspiracy theory supporters can't provide any evidence substantiating their rock solid US government conspiracy theory showing the very conspiracy they allege took place? It's crazy. You all believe in a fiction for which you can't provide any evidence. You're a little mixed up, again. You are the one(s) alleging the conspiracy, Wilber was simply asking for some evidence. As I and others have to no avail. Your latest attempt was I think the supposed engine discrepancy on flight 175, and that got shot down (pardon the expression) so we wait for your next. Quote
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 The tag team wrestlers are at it again. How come the US government conspiracy theory supporters can't provide any evidence substantiating their rock solid US government conspiracy theory showing the very conspiracy they allege took place? It's crazy. You all believe in a fiction for which you can't provide any evidence. Where is Boges? OBL was not responsible for 911 and still the anti-truthers soldier on with their zero evidence dog and pony show. Quote
hot enough Posted June 20, 2017 Author Report Posted June 20, 2017 11 minutes ago, Omni said: the supposed engine discrepancy on flight 175, Still no evidence, no sources from Omni. Never any sources from Omni. Quote
Omni Posted June 20, 2017 Report Posted June 20, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: Still no evidence, no sources from Omni. Never any sources from Omni. Well I guess you didn't read my links because they disprove your "troother" nonsense. That's OK, you keep those blinders on. Steve Jones is probably making money off you since that university gig didn't work out so well. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.