Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

lol

So the truth is that the Harper propagandists are trying to bluff us into believing "increase" in Federal health funding, when in fact the 'increase' is not enough to cover increases in cost and demand.

So effectively the increase is a decrease in per person funding.

.

No, that's completely false.

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Just breathtaking., As if the Khmer Rouge government sang Kumbaya real well. Most of the other ones you listed were pretty bad as well.

What's breathtaking, jbg, is your wonderful ability to generate highly disconnected memes and false history.

The Khmer Rouge sang, "Thanks for the money and support" to the USA.

Posted

Most of the other ones you listed were pretty bad as well.

Go ahead and explain, using your exceptional knowledge of history, how the ones I listed "were pretty bad as well".

But yet you support the greatest terrorists on the planet, the USA, the ones that have been terrorizing, poisoning, torturing, killing Cubans, Iraqis, afghans, Nicaraguans, Brazilians, Guatemalans, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Filipinos, Chinese, Laotians, Hawaiians, ... for over a century.

And don't forget Native Americans.

And you don't see the huge disconnect in your thinking?

Posted

I read that wrong.

1. The funding will generally increase by slightly more than 3%. Overall health spending (mostly out of pocket) will increase by 4.9%.

2. We need to do better at becoming more efficient.

Number 1 meme falls flat, but number 2 is at the ready.

Posted

Costs increase.

Aging increases demand.

Is that considered?

.

And provinces guaranteed large funding increases make zero effort to improve efficiencies, and even waste masses of money.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

lol

So the truth is that the Harper propagandists are trying to bluff us into believing "increase" in Federal health funding, when in fact the 'increase' is not enough to cover increases in cost and demand.

You act like health care spending is not something the provinces have any control over. There are many ways for them to improve efficiencies and still improve health care. Most of them just aren't bothering to try.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

But yet you support the greatest terrorists on the planet,

Speaking of supporting terrorists, I understand a Danish man was almost sent to jail for posting "Je suis Omar' on his facebook page, in sympathy with the murderer and terrorist Omar El Hussein. But you know this, right?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

I am mostly impressed with the facts that you have brought forward to support your "argument", smallc.

And yet, they are more than sufficient to overwhelm your radical left wing, factless bleating.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Apparently every provincial leader in the country disagrees with you.

Are you kidding me!? You're saying the provinces want more money!? Wow! Mark this down as a historical first!

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Are you kidding me!? You're saying the provinces want more money!? Wow! Mark this down as a historical first!

No, Im not kidding you. And here is a futuristic fact you may not be aware of...provinces are going to be forced to deal with an ageing population while the funding for caring for those people is reduced. Hows that for a wow!

Posted

No, Im not kidding you. And here is a futuristic fact you may not be aware of...provinces are going to be forced to deal with an ageing population while the funding for caring for those people is reduced. Hows that for a wow!

Gee, maybe the provinces should come with... what's that thing called... uhm... on the tip of my tongue, wait... a plan! Yes a plan! Maybe they should plan for this and develop some ideas and policies to deal with it! They also have the ability to raise taxes themselves by the way.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Gee, maybe the provinces should come with... what's that thing called... uhm... on the tip of my tongue, wait... a plan! Yes a plan! Maybe they should plan for this and develop some ideas and policies to deal with it! They also have the ability to raise taxes themselves by the way.

Harper has had one of those things you seemed to struggle to name, yes a plan, to kill healthcare which he stated during his days at the NCC. While you might like to joke about it, some of us see the writing on the wall here and are concerned about a very important cornerstone of Canadian culture

Posted (edited)

Harper has had one of those things you seemed to struggle to name, yes a plan, to kill healthcare which he stated during his days at the NCC.

Paranoid looniness. Harper's been PM for years now and you still hide under the bed for fear of his 'hidden agenda'.

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)

Speaking of supporting terrorists, ... But you know this, right?

I'm impressed by your "economic and statistics" offerings, Argus. You really offer killer sources!

Photos of the six Jesuit priests and their housekeeper murdered by U.S.-supported soldier in El Salvador's civil warone of many examples of ... NOVEMBER 3, 2014

Noam Chomsky: The Long, Shameful History of American Terrorism

President Obama should call our countrys history of supporting insurgents abroad for what it is: U.S.-backed terrorism.

BY NOAM CHOMSKY

It's official: The U.S. is the world's leading terrorist state, and proud of it.

That should have been the headline for the lead story in the New York Times on October 15, which was more politely titled CIA Study of Covert Aid Fueled Skepticism About Helping Syrian Rebels.

The article reports on a CIA review of recent U.S. covert operations to determine their effectiveness. The White House concluded that unfortunately successes were so rare that some rethinking of the policy was in order.

The article quoted President Barack Obama as saying that he had asked the CIA to conduct the review to find cases of financing and supplying arms to an insurgency in a country that actually worked out well. And they couldn't come up with much. So Obama has some reluctance about continuing such efforts.

The first paragraph of the Times article cites three major examples of covert aid: Angola, Nicaragua and Cuba. In fact, each case was a major terrorist operation conducted by the U.S.

http://inthesetimes.com/article/17311/noam_chomsky_the_worlds_greatest_terrorist_campaign

Edited by Je suis Omar
Posted

Jacee:

So effectively the increase is a decrease in per person funding.

No, that's completely false.

Really? Then why do you say that we have to become 'more efficient'?

.

Posted

Paranoid looniness. Harper's been PM for years now and you still hide under the bed for fear of his 'hidden agenda'.

Not hidden in the least. Go back and see what his comments were when he was president of the NCC up to 2002. And while youre at it check out what business the founder of same, Colin Brown, was in. Ill save you the effort, private insurance, surprise surprise. Harper of course has to be quiet about his agenda because he has also to be aware of the polls. Be careful, to paraphrase Joni Mitchell, you dont know what youve got till its gone.

Posted

Not hidden in the least. Go back and see what his comments were when he was president of the NCC up to 2002. And while youre at it check out what business the founder of same, Colin Brown, was in. Ill save you the effort, private insurance, surprise surprise. Harper of course has to be quiet about his agenda because he has also to be aware of the polls. Be careful, to paraphrase Joni Mitchell, you dont know what youve got till its gone.

So how long do you think Harper will keep his hidden agenda hidden away? Till after he's no longer PM? Little late to do anything about it by then, don't you think?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

So how long do you think Harper will keep his hidden agenda hidden away? Till after he's no longer PM? Little late to do anything about it by then, don't you think?

He is already working on it. Just being a bit careful. But has been able to convince some that who arent too good at math that he is not offloading billions onto the provinces. And he is opening the door more and more for privatization. Just like Colin Brown told him to.

Posted

Not less yet because the Martin program has not ended yet. But coming soon to a provincial healthcare system near you.

The Martin program ended March 31, 2014.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...