justme4567 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 And a single person and 3 unelected Judges over threw our court system. It is a process. I really aint political i am legal, All the racist ranting and political b. s. has zip to do with the FACT no Judge can over rules the process of the courts...... and I just think it's hilarious that the issue of where do our rights stop and others rights begin...appears to...beer. baaahhhhhaaaaa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted September 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 And a single person and 3 unelected Judges over threw our court system. It is a process. I really aint political i am legal, All the racist ranting and political b. s. has zip to do with the FACT no Judge can over rules the process of the courts...... and I just think it's hilarious that the issue of where do our rights stop and others rights begin...appears to...beer. baaahhhhhaaaaa 4 judges (1 in the first case and a panel of 3 in the second). And if you had an ounce of a legal mind, you would know that the niqab ban was a government policy that violated a government law that regulated what judges can and cannot do during citizenship ceremonies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 And a single person and 3 unelected Judges over threw our court system. It is a process. What a giant pivot. So... I guess we're just going to forget about this Oktoberfest nonsense then ? Good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter F Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 Yes, I'm not sure how appealing to a court and having the court listen to legal arguments from the niqab wearer and government lawyers then rendering a decision based upon the actual law of the land is overthrowing the courts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITIZEN_2015 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) So, a single person starting an online petition is proof that a caliphate is coming. It is not a single person. They are growing in number every day. I have a message to that single or more person(s). If they don't like what is here already then go back to your own place but don't come here and try to change the way of life for people who are born here. Next they may target alcohol sale, discos, strip bars, premarital sex.... Btw, the Conservative party is not much different. They banned consensual paid sex between adults last year which based on many surveys a good majority of Canadians believed should have remained legal. As Trudeau said with friends like them who needs enemy!!!!. Edited September 18, 2015 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justme4567 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 what pivot....I've argued the legality from the beginning. All things considered a moot point presently as the govt is in court today filing the appeal AND the proper process. The ruling will go into limbo and at the end of the day what it really effects is all the other poor refuges who just want to come here and live out their lives as Canadians. oh the issue is..... the ruling that said the 60 days we must ALL must adhere to was to be waived so an individual could vote in 30 days...That is against the rules of the court. Try going into court and ask to have anything done...right now...lmao. and i am too a nice thing!!!!!! huh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted September 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) It is not a single man. They are growing in number every day. The Muslim Menace! Everyone be scared! They make up an entire 3% of the country and every last one of them is radical! look out! They're going to be the majority next year! Edited September 18, 2015 by cybercoma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justme4567 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 It is not a single person. They are growing in number every day. I have a message to that single or more person(s). If they don't like what is here already then go back to your own place but don't come here and try to change the way of life for people who are born here. Next they may target alcohol sale, discos, strip bars, premarital sex.... Btw, the Conservative party is not much different. They banned consensual paid sex between adults last year which based on many survey a majority of Canadians believed should have remained legal. As Trudeau said with friends like them who needs enemy!!!!. you r more than correct. The laws in other cultures are often punishable by death and they can ban hookers all they like here but in our country it's more of a suggestion...at least by the looks of the hooker presently standing on the corner across the street from my store... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITIZEN_2015 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 The Muslim Menace! Everyone be scared! They make up an entire 3% of the country and every last one of them is radical! look out! They're going to be the majority next year! I am no expert in constitution but I am guessing that one or a group of neighbors may claim that their rights or safety may have been violated say because there is a disco in their street where young drunken men go to and get out drunk and get the courts to shut it down. Just a wild example. In democracies a small number can be very effective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted September 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 If the police came and shut it down it would be for already established laws like being drunk in public or noise complaints, not because the state is biased and supporting Muslims. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justme4567 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 The Muslim Menace! Everyone be scared! They make up an entire 3% of the country and every last one of them is radical! look out! They're going to be the majority next year! ahhh on the subject of alcohol there would be a great support from our own citizens on that one. Prohibition was in our lifetime...i was little...lololol beer drinkers r quivering. lmao..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter F Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 oh the issue is..... the ruling that said the 60 days we must ALL must adhere to was to be waived so an individual could vote in 30 days...That is against the rules of the court. Try going into court and ask to have anything done...right now...lmao. A rule of the court was waived and thats against the rules of the court....What rule are you talking about? I would appreciate reference of some sort instead of just your legal opinion (of which, judging your recent writings, I have little regard). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter F Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 If the police came and shut it down it would be for already established laws like being drunk in public or noise complaints, not because the state is biased and supporting Muslims. indeed. It seems that there is a belief out there that anyone can ask for anything and the law of the land immediately becomes moot. Many people have asked bars/disco's/booze haunts be shut down - usually through petitions or appeal to civic councils. i cannot see why some guy starts a petition so we need act to stop immigration. Doesn't make sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITIZEN_2015 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) If the police came and shut it down it would be for already established laws like being drunk in public or noise complaints, not because the state is biased and supporting Muslims. Actually I gave a bad example (I did say I don't know much though) as any nightclub with disorderly patrons may bring complains from anyone even the most open minded people. As another likely better example I describe the following scenario: A single person or a group of them claiming that HEARING a music which comes out of the nightclub in the neighborhood or in a public street violates his religious freedom and rights as in his religion hearing music is banned!!!!. How about this? I am not suggesting banning Muslims. Please refer to my previous posts encouraging selection based on skills and adoptability regardless of race, religion, national origin........... All I say is that Immigration authorities must be more selective as who will come to this country Edited September 18, 2015 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justme4567 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 The Muslim Menace! Everyone be scared! They make up an entire 3% of the country and every last one of them is radical! look out! They're going to be the majority next year! Now who's being racist...i think your numbers r wrong with the 3% but most just want to BE CANADIANS! A small number that is growing rapidly are destroying the chances of others staying in our country. This crazy crap is shutting door fast and loud. And mostly for the abandoned woman, anybody who's sponsor has withdrawn are being told to pack their bags and go home. sad but true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter F Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) In reply to Citizen 2015 post #1764 How about it? A single person can file a complaint about anything they want to file a complaint about. One need not hold a referendum to seek approval to complain about my neighbours dog or my neighbours loud music or the hookers walking down the street. Edited September 18, 2015 by Peter F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITIZEN_2015 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) In reply to Citizen 2015 post #1764 How about it? A single person can file a complaint about anything they want to file a complaint about. One need not hold a referendum to seek approval to complain about my neighbours dog or my neighbours loud music or the hookers walking down the streetI was . I wasn't suggesting complains though Peter. I was suggesting the possibility of a constitutional challenge on the grounds of violation of rights and individual freedom which may be ruled favorably by courts. Edited September 18, 2015 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter F Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 I have absolutely no problem whatsoever should any individual claim a violation of that persons right and that persons right being upheld by the courts. Even if they are a Muslim. Or me. Or you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITIZEN_2015 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) I have absolutely no problem whatsoever should any individual claim a violation of that persons right and that persons right being upheld by the courts. Even if they are a Muslim. Or me. Or you. I just like the country as it is now. I don't wish risking it changed to a middle eastern country. Then how about my rights? if they don't like it the way it is now then they can and should go back to where they like more. What I said I am sure is acceptable to a majority. Edited September 18, 2015 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justme4567 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 A rule of the court was waived and thats against the rules of the court....What rule are you talking about? I would appreciate reference of some sort instead of just your legal opinion (of which, judging your recent writings, I have little regard). 60 day appeal of any ruling, they can NOT address, change of modify it to suit their purpose. It's called "the process" nothing can over rule it. well maybe the govt but they shall follow proper procedure and r. ummm my writing well i had to produce legal documents to the courts for 5 years where top legal minds spent days going over.... every..... word. when i retired i promised myself i would NEVER write that crap again. i prfurr to babble. lolololololol..oh stalking, theft of govt documents andddd the right of any crazy person to file whatever they want in our courts. our civil process is a gong show. i dont ...do...spell check either....lmao... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter F Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) 60 day appeal of any ruling, they can NOT address, change of modify it to suit their purpose. It's called "the process" nothing can over rule it. Yes, I understand that you really believe that. I am asking for a reference to the rule that led you to that belief. I think you may be mistaken y'see. Edited September 18, 2015 by Peter F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justme4567 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 oh the legal In reply to Citizen 2015 post #1764 How about it? A single person can file a complaint about anything they want to file a complaint about. One need not hold a referendum to seek approval to complain about my neighbours dog or my neighbours loud music or the hookers walking down the street. yes a single person and the legal wording is. I have knowledge in evidence or ...belief. it is purfectly legal to file such a claim and it is hard to comprehend what some people believe. LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justme4567 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) Yes, I understand that you really believe that. I am asking for a reference to the rule that led you to that belief. I think you may be mistaken y'see. well considering the govt announced they would appeal it before the 60 days probably a good reference. and yes i do have a number of court rulings in my favor I either had to wait out or address it's the process of our court system....read the book. andd it's been fun chow for now . Edited September 18, 2015 by justme4567 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter F Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 I just like the country as it is now. I don't wish risking it changed to a middle eastern country. Then how about my rights? if they don't like it the way it is now then they can and should go back to where they like more. What I said I am sure is acceptable to a majority. Yes, I understand that too. It's not a way-out-there thought and has been brought up many many times almost always on immigration threads. But the realization of your fear requires immigrants to never change. Followed by arguments that yes many European immigrants change but Muslim immigrants will never change and and their children will never change either therefore - eventually, some day - Muslims will outnumber us. I don't hold that belief. Nor do I see any actual evidence to support it. But let me for a moment assume you are correct and the day does come where a majority of the voting population are muslims. Assuming also that at that point the majority starts electing politicians that run on political platforms they support and all your worst fears are realized - Sharia law, Dhimi taxes, etc. To that assumption I say well thats the democratic process isn't it? The NDP - supposedly a bunch of socialist/commies who will destroy freedom - may possibly form the next government (god and voters willing!) Many find such a possibility totally reprehensible. Shall we ban the NDP ? Or shall we let democracy flow? I say let it flow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter F Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 i do have a number of court rulings in my favor I either had to wait out or address it's the process of our court system....read the book. Well, again, thats what I'm asking - What book? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.