GostHacked Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 This is my opinion, i don't think Iran is stable enough to have Nuclear wpns, Why is it that the west does not want them with any nuclear capabilities....Iran has not proven to be that stable guy, in fact many of the leaders in that country would love to see Israel be pushed into the sea....Iran already knows that even a single war head would be very deadly to Israel, and they would not be able to recover form it it would be left in a weaken state enough so that perhaps other ME countries might be tempted to finish them off........that being said Israel has over 400 nuclear wpns, iran would cease to exist along with most of the ME....but that does not seem to frighten Iran or it's leadership....that is the problem.... Does it matter, all that matters is where does the US stand, on the issue of Israel.... Iran's been more stable than MOST of the middle east for the past few decades. That is despite Israel and the US performing special operations within Iran to create turmoil. We can talk Stuxnet and the nuclear plant. Also attacks on their elite guard training facility and attacks on other military installations. It does not get reported much and when it does, it rarely gets the exposure needed. Since there does not seem to be the Al-queda problem in Iran, I can say that they are a lot more stable. Also Netanyahu is no longer the leader if Israel. A recent election changed that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monty16 Posted June 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 I would take the Israeli and American General's opinion over yours and Netanyahu's. Of course the Western governments would not want any country to go to nuclear. Especially a country that doesn't sing the same political tunes as most of the West. Namely, its stance and criticism of Israel. I am glad to see that the U.S. is engaging Iran. This is the only way to go. The country that shouldn't have nuclear weapons is the country that is threatening to use them on another country. Guess who? And I've just proven in post #71 that there's a great threat of that country using them. The greatest threat in the world at this particular moment in time. The US and it's intended victim could be Iran. And that is why Iran needs to get it's own nuclear weapons soon, in order to save it's people from the US. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monty16 Posted July 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2014 It just could be a good time to start talking about Syria again. Syria is becoming a big problem for the US and it's pretty certain that if a terrorist attack comes now, it's going to be blamed on Syria. Even though everything is pointing at the possibility of another attack from Saudis. The US needs a pretext for going into Syria. Watch and listen to the news carefully. All the signs are there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted July 4, 2014 Report Share Posted July 4, 2014 The US needs a pretext for going into Syria. Watch and listen to the news carefully. All the signs are there! All the signs were there two years ago. Glad you are catching up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.