Pros and cons on 'increased' immigration.

[dre]

The Hells Angels are a criminal organization. Simple solution. You write a law which says anyone belonging to a criminal organization goes to jail. There ya go. They'll get their court date and be gone.

Thats contrary to the principles of our justice system, and besides that its flat out stupid. The only way we know who the members are is if they feel like giving us a roster or even feel like maintaining one in the first place.

The real way to fight groups like that is to give honest, regulated, tax paying businessmen the right to compete with these organizations in the areas where they get all their revenue... which is mostly soft drugs and prostitution.

[Argus]

Thats contrary to the principles of our justice system, and besides that its flat out stupid. The only way we know who the members are is if they feel like giving us a roster or even feel like maintaining one in the first place.

The cops know who the members are. Hell, they even wear uniforms. It's no big secret. Put them in prison.

And I couldn't care less if it's 'contrary to the principles' of your legal system (it's not a justice system).

[Guest Peeves]

Thats contrary to the principles of our justice system, and besides that its flat out stupid. The only way we know who the members are is if they feel like giving us a roster or even feel like maintaining one in the first place.

The real way to fight groups like that is to give honest, regulated, tax paying businessmen the right to compete with these organizations in the areas where they get all their revenue... which is mostly soft drugs and prostitution.

Oh I don't know. Seems to me when anyone runs up numerous charges and convictions there should be a means of keeping them off the street permanently. I'm not an advocate for three strikes laws, but, there should be a line.

And, if a refugee claimant spits on the street, send their ass home. We have enough of the home grown variety, don't need more criminals and scoff laws.

While were at it, if their lawyer has subverted or circumvented immigration or refugee laws, debar him and fine his/her ass off to the extent of costs associated with the crooked cases.

Edited July 9, 2012 by Peeves

[cybercoma]

freedom of association.

Reasonable limits. It's a reasonable limit on the freedom of association to make it a crime to belong to criminal organization. Having said that, they burden of proof would be on the prosecution to make it patently clear that the person was formally a member of said organization, not just an associate, friend, or hang-around.

[jacee]

I have no problem with immigration as long as we're taking in quality over quantity. Canada doesn't need any more elderly immigrants to put even more strain on our health care system which currently takes up half of the overall budget as it is.

We need working age immigrants who have specialized skills and are highly educated in reasonable schools. We have enough cab drivers and other uneducated people doing the grunt work. We need people to help make Canada better not drag us down and hold us back 20 years.

We should be focused on building an elite society not a mediocre one.

Sounds like these people ...

kicked off the list after 4 years and told to reapply under the new rules ... when they should have been given priority processing.

Edited July 16, 2012 by jacee

[Dissenter]

Asian countries for Asians.

African countries for Africans.

White countries for everybody or you're racist!

It is said that there is this RACE problem. It is said that this RACE problem will be solved when people from around the world pour into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of people from around the world and "assimilating" with them.

It is said that the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem, but rather the final solution to the BLACK problem?

How long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I'm a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist, but they're really anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Since 1948, international law has defined genocide as the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group.

Raphael Lemkin, who created the word, used it broadly to describe not only outright extermination, but also demographic restructuring and policies that bring about the destruction of culture, language, national feelings and religion.

"For the economy..." doesn't justify genocide.

"Population growth..." doesn't justify genocide.

"Because of history..." doesn't justify genocide.

"We all bleed red..." doesn't justify genocide.

"Race is just a social construct..." doesn't justify genocide.

There is no justification for genocide.