Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

YOu gotta see this guy, crazy or what, he's doing 299 Km or around 186 miles per hour on the Trans Canada Highway and he video it. I will say he's eithr a very good driver or very lucky someone didn't move in front of him. Now, I wonder after the ticket if the insurance company will raise his insurance and probably end his need for speed? http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Motorcyclist+shoots+video+travelling/6474434/story.html

Posted

I can't understood why such high performance vehicles are even legal for use on public streets. It's like allowing the use of machine-guns for hunting.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

I dunno about motorcycles, but I know that in a car, going ~200km/h doesn't feel much different than ~110 km/h if you're on a straight flat highway like big stretches of the Trans Canada are. Obviously not a good idea with the slow moving traffic around you though.

My view is that it's not speed that is most dangerous, but differences in speed between vehicles on the same road. If everyone is going 200km/h, they are all standing still relative to each other. Long straight stretches of highway should have much higher speed limits than they presently do. I think it would actually be safer. Right now you have speeders going 30-50 km/h faster than people who are trying to stick to the speed limit. Raise the speed limit by those 30-50 km/h, and people will be traveling at more uniform speeds.

Posted

I dunno about motorcycles, but I know that in a car, going ~200km/h doesn't feel much different than ~110 km/h if you're on a straight flat highway like big stretches of the Trans Canada are. Obviously not a good idea with the slow moving traffic around you though.

My view is that it's not speed that is most dangerous, but differences in speed between vehicles on the same road. If everyone is going 200km/h, they are all standing still relative to each other. Long straight stretches of highway should have much higher speed limits than they presently do. I think it would actually be safer. Right now you have speeders going 30-50 km/h faster than people who are trying to stick to the speed limit. Raise the speed limit by those 30-50 km/h, and people will be traveling at more uniform speeds.

Might not the dangerous non-uniformity of vehicles' speeds remain intact--but at a higher (and so more deadly) average speed?

That is, instead of 110's vs 140s, might we not have 130s vs 160s?

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,891
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    armchairscholar
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...