WWWTT Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 Singh is wearing a turban or something and i hate religion so hes damaged goods You like walking on the edge don't you buddy! WWWTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWTT Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 the first person to denounce religion wins my vote I think you should be voting marxist/lennonist or something like that WWWTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olpfan1 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 You like walking on the edge don't you buddy! WWWTT I don't want any party leader of the party I vote for to wear turbans, cross necklaces or anything that has anything to do with religion.. or even talk about it that to me is unelectable i dont think im the only one who thinks that way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olpfan1 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 I think you should be voting marxist/lennonist or something like that WWWTT why do you say that? im not familiar with marxists or lennonists Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWTT Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 why do you say that? im not familiar with marxists or lennonists They are pro athiest WWWTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olpfan1 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 They are pro athiest WWWTT but im not athiest, im deist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWTT Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 but im not athiest, im deist Ok ok.Whatever you win?? This thread is about the next PM of Canada and not about religion. WWWTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olpfan1 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 Ok ok.Whatever you win?? This thread is about the next PM of Canada and not about religion. WWWTT isnt this about the next ndp leader of canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWTT Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 isnt this about the next ndp leader of canada Same thing WWWTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j44 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 I think you should be voting marxist/lennonist or something like that WWWTT John Lennonist? Mulcair is still the top guy in the debates as far as I'm concerned. He won again today. Cullen held his own. Dewar not so much. Topp needs a personality. If i didn't know any better I would think Ashton was trying to help Mulcair but constantly teeing up softball questions for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 Ashton needs to drop out and throw her support behind someone else. I can't stand that self-satisfied smirk she gives after everything she says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWTT Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 John Lennonist? Mulcair is still the top guy in the debates as far as I'm concerned. He won again today. Cullen held his own. Dewar not so much. Topp needs a personality. If i didn't know any better I would think Ashton was trying to help Mulcair but constantly teeing up softball questions for him. If you get entertainment from someones spelling errors then you've got issues. Aswell I would like to ask you if you are an NDP member and if you will be attending the convention on the 24th March. WWWTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWTT Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 Ashton needs to drop out and throw her support behind someone else. I can't stand that self-satisfied smirk she gives after everything she says. She needs to be there for all of the debates. The NDP only have three seats on the prairies and her presence is mandatory not optional WWWTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olpfan1 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 Ashton needs to drop out and throw her support behind someone else. I can't stand that self-satisfied smirk she gives after everything she says. She talks the same to the CPC during question period as she does during debates she sounds... hostile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evening Star Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Has the debate been archived for streaming anywhere? Didn't catch it live. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Has the debate been archived for streaming anywhere? Didn't catch it live. I'm not sure, but it will be rebroadcast at 9pm EST on CPAC and probably the NDP site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted February 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Topp is quite annoying and a bad speaker, I don't understand what the party establishment see in him. I had liked Paul Dewar but have found him pretty dull and odd in debates, the whole crew of them don't really bring anything interesting to politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evening Star Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 I'm not sure, but it will be rebroadcast at 9pm EST on CPAC and probably the NDP site. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) Topp is quite annoying and a bad speaker, I don't understand what the party establishment see in him. I had liked Paul Dewar but have found him pretty dull and odd in debates, the whole crew of them don't really bring anything interesting to politics. Try talking to him one on one he is very a smart man. Edited February 27, 2012 by punked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j44 Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 If you get entertainment from someones spelling errors then you've got issues. Aswell I would like to ask you if you are an NDP member and if you will be attending the convention on the 24th March. WWWTT I have issues but it is not because I found that amusing. And it wasn't so much just the spelling it was the totally different meaning of Lennon vs. Lenin. And no to both questions. Has the debate been archived for streaming anywhere? Didn't catch it live. I'd bet CPAC's site will have it. Try talking to him one on one he is very a smart man. I don't doubt that he is smart but if they put him in as leader they will be making the same mistake the Liberals did the last two times around. Both leaders were smart but obviously not leaders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capricorn Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 I don't doubt that he is smart but if they put him in as leader they will be making the same mistake the Liberals did the last two times around. Both leaders were smart but obviously not leaders. I agree. I can't see him going toe to toe with Harper either in the House or in a debate. Looks to me like Mulcair is the likely choice in that department. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted February 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 The most interesting thing about Topp winning the leadership race would be the by-election that would follow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 I agree. I can't see him going toe to toe with Harper either in the House or in a debate. Looks to me like Mulcair is the likely choice in that department. Mulcair is the bilingual pit bull the Dips require to go toe to toe with the current Machiavelian gang running the show in Ottawa... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted February 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Peggy Nash seemed like she had a good chance of taking the leadership for a while but now that she's unable to answer questions regarding corporate tax increases and private health care she might alienate members. Tom Mulcair's attack of how the NDP have operated up until now may not play well with members either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capricorn Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Mulcair is the bilingual pit bull the Dips require to go toe to toe with the current Machiavelian gang running the show in Ottawa... Isn't Harper the gang of one? That's who Mulcair has to concentrate on besting. That's how Mulcair can cement his persona as a strong leader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.