olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 (edited) 90 K to save millions. Good move by the CPC,I must say. lol, didnt you read they are paying 20+ millions a year and yet they said they aren't gonna be able to be able to balance the budget sounds like a big f****** fail to me Edited November 20, 2011 by olp1fan Quote
lukin Posted November 20, 2011 Author Report Posted November 20, 2011 lol, didnt you read they are paying 20+ millions a year and yet they said they aren't gonna be able to be able to balance the budget sounds like a big f****** fail to me Yeah, but you aren't very well informed. you don't understand how the inner workings work. Don't feel bad; you have plenty of company in that regard. Quote
CPCFTW Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 (edited) lol, didnt you read they are paying 20+ millions a year and yet they said they aren't gonna be able to be able to balance the budget sounds like a big f****** fail to me Yeah how stupid of them to ask for the assistance of professional consultants in determining policy instead of simply watching a David Suzuki or Michael Moore documentary like the NDP! Edited November 20, 2011 by CPCFTW Quote
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 Yeah, but you aren't very well informed. you don't understand how the inner workings work. Don't feel bad; you have plenty of company in that regard. neither do the conservatives Quote
E James Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 Yeah how stupid of them to ask for the assistance of professional consultants in determining policy instead of simply watching a David Suzuki or Michael Moore documentary like the NDP! That makes absolutely no sense what so ever. What proof do you have that the NDP develops policy from watching Michael Moore or David Suzuki? How about you contribute rather than lend to taking swipes at shadows. Quote ericthoughts blog "If you want to see me again, don't bring signs saying "Trudeau is a pig" and don't bring signs that he hustles women, because I won't talk to you. I didn't get into politics to be insulted. And don't throw wheat at me either. If you don't stop that, I'll kick you right in the ass." Pierre Elliot Trudeau
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 (edited) Yeah how stupid of them to ask for the assistance of professional consultants in determining policy instead of simply watching a David Suzuki or Michael Moore documentary like the NDP! ........... really? when the liberals were the government they never hired consultants to do their work and they gave Canada a surplus which aide Canada to survive the recession fairly well even with a clueless reformist government Edited November 20, 2011 by olp1fan Quote
E James Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 (edited) . Edited November 20, 2011 by E James Quote ericthoughts blog "If you want to see me again, don't bring signs saying "Trudeau is a pig" and don't bring signs that he hustles women, because I won't talk to you. I didn't get into politics to be insulted. And don't throw wheat at me either. If you don't stop that, I'll kick you right in the ass." Pierre Elliot Trudeau
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 (edited) . yeah wrong guy Edited November 20, 2011 by olp1fan Quote
E James Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 I misread the Liberals not having to hire consultants and assumed it was him again. Sorry. Quote ericthoughts blog "If you want to see me again, don't bring signs saying "Trudeau is a pig" and don't bring signs that he hustles women, because I won't talk to you. I didn't get into politics to be insulted. And don't throw wheat at me either. If you don't stop that, I'll kick you right in the ass." Pierre Elliot Trudeau
lukin Posted November 20, 2011 Author Report Posted November 20, 2011 ........... really? when the liberals were the government they never hired consultants to do their work and they gave Canada a surplus which aide Canada to survive the recession fairly well even with a clueless reformist government Liberals. Didn't they raid the EI fund at one time, allowing them to look like financial wizards, fooling the fools in the process? Quote
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 Liberals. Didn't they raid the EI fund at one time, allowing them to look like financial wizards, fooling the fools in the process? The Canadian public knew about it... its not like they did it secretly and it was necessary and the public went along with it but good try Quote
lukin Posted November 20, 2011 Author Report Posted November 20, 2011 (edited) The Canadian public knew about it... its not like they did it secretly and it was necessary and the public went along with it but good try What public went along with it? Liberal partisans? If the CPC did that you lefties would freak out. That's the hypocrisy of many in this country. So you'd be OK if the CPC did the exact same thing, and came out of it looking like economic geniuses? Honest answer required please. Edited November 20, 2011 by lukin Quote
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 What public went along with it? Liberal partisans? If the CPC did that you lefties would freak out. That's the hypocrisy of many in this country. So you'd be OK if the CPC did the exact same thing, and came out of it looking like economic geniuses? Honest answer required please. the cons would have to show they are serious in getting rid of the defecit by cancelling the jets, prisons and cancelling the crime bill... if they do that then yes Quote
lukin Posted November 20, 2011 Author Report Posted November 20, 2011 (edited) the cons would have to show they are serious in getting rid of the defecit by cancelling the jets, prisons and cancelling the crime bill... if they do that then yes yeah, lets continue the hug-a-thug approach to crime. Let's keep relying on the U.S. for protection. Let's give pedophiles and violent criminals slaps on the wrists...to hell with putting them in prisons. Yeah...sounds good. Edited November 20, 2011 by lukin Quote
cybercoma Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 'Tis the season to be trolling trollolololl lolololll Quote
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 yeah, lets continue the hug-a-thug approach to crime. Let's keep relying on the U.S. for protection. Let's give pedophiles and violent criminals slaps on the wrists...to hell with putting them in prisons. Yeah...sounds good. we're in the biggest defecit of our history.. now is not the time to spend spend spend the libs in the 90s even cut down their spending by a lot why cant the "fiscal conservatives"? Quote
Smallc Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 It isn't really the biggest deficit in history (and this year's was much smaller anyway). Our economy is almost three times as big as it was, and so the total number is meaningless. Quote
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 It isn't really the biggest deficit in history (and this year's was much smaller anyway). Our economy is almost three times as big as it was, and so the total number is meaningless. when was the biggest? Quote
lukin Posted November 20, 2011 Author Report Posted November 20, 2011 It isn't really the biggest deficit in history (and this year's was much smaller anyway). Our economy is almost three times as big as it was, and so the total number is meaningless. That is true. Most people are blind to the truth. Canada is not perfect, but we are in much better shape than many. Quote
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 from a 2009 article http://www.thestar.com/iphone/news/canada/article/742220--flaherty-s-deficit-plan-take-an-axe-and-cut-deep OTTAWA–Faced with the largest federal deficit in history, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says he will start looking for programs to axe and government assets to sell off as soon as the economy recovers. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 lol, didnt you read they are paying 20+ millions a year and yet they said they aren't gonna be able to be able to balance the budget sounds like a big f****** fail to me They’re not paying “20 million a year”….the contract runs till March of next year……Spending 20 million to hire a battery of lawyers and accountants to find ~ 4 billion in savings is a hell of a deal……..OJ Simpson, it is estimated, spent close to 6 million for his defence team in the 1990s…… Quote
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 That is true. Most people are blind to the truth. Canada is not perfect, but we are in much better shape than many. our household debt is one of the highest in the industrial world Quote
olp1fan Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 They’re not paying “20 million a year”….the contract runs till March of next year……Spending 20 million to hire a battery of lawyers and accountants to find ~ 4 billion in savings is a hell of a deal……..OJ Simpson, it is estimated, spent close to 6 million for his defence team in the 1990s…… You need a better example than OJ LOL and what should happen if the Cons manage to not cut down the defecit by 2015 like they promised? will you vote for them? probably Quote
Jack Weber Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 *yawn* But he does have a majority. Too bad for you socialists. The sad thing is that you seem to thimk that anyone who might have an issue with the Harper Government (tm pending) is a "socialist"... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
Smallc Posted November 20, 2011 Report Posted November 20, 2011 when was the biggest? I don't know, because dollar figures aren't nearly as important as percentage of GDP. Quote
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.