Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Research confirms modern humans are part Neanderthal

After comparing thousands of gene sequences, researchers at the University of Montreal have confirmed that — with the exception of people in sub-Saharan Africa — people today carry a tiny bit of the same X chromosome carried by Neanderthals.
Neanderthals were physically similar to modern humans but stronger, with shorter, stockier bodies, angled cheek bones and a large nose. Their brains were the same size as Homo sapiens’ and they also possessed the gene for language.

Neanderthals also controlled fire, lived in shelters, and occasionally made symbolic or ornamental objects. The first Neanderthal fossil was discovered in 1856 in Germany in the Neander Valley, hence the hominid’s name.

What's with the red hair thing though? This will set gingers back even further than they are now. :D

Posted

Research confirms modern humans are part Neanderthal

What's with the red hair thing though? This will set gingers back even further than they are now. :D

Gingers are the best - when they are female. Neandrethals are all over the place - I knew a family of them when I was a kid..They were second generation Canadians originally from some old eastern european country - they had the faces - the skulls and they had the gait of cave men..This gene will pop up in YOUR own family when genetics decieds to recycle an ancient.

Posted
too complicate things further there appears to be another player in the ancestry besides Neanderthals,Denisovans...discovered in Russia and known only from a couple of teeth and the 40,000ybp pinkie bone of a girl they apparently left DNA behind that can be found in today's Melanesians of SE Asia ...
What's with the red hair thing though? This will set gingers back even further than they are now. :D

red hair is found everywhere even in sub-Saharan Africans, so not strictly neanderthal trait...it's one of those recessive things...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted

The article is poorly named and summarized. Humans share over 98% of their genome with chimps. Does that mean we are "part chimp"? We share over 90% of our genome with mice. Does that mean we are "part mouse"? The relevance of the article is only anthropological in nature, it indicates that humans and neanderthals interbred at some point. But then, our more distance ancestors of completely other species also interbred with various other earlier species.

Overall, all I can say is: "meh".

Posted
Overall, all I can say is: "meh".
It is interesting because it lays to rest the bizarre assumption that Neanderthals did not interbreed and simply went extinct.
Posted

It is interesting because it lays to rest the bizarre assumption that Neanderthals did not interbreed and simply went extinct.

no it does't. The amount of crossover does not seem large....and they did, simply become extinct.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...