Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The focus on Dewar's book isn't Kennewick man though, that is a sort of back drop device for a critical review of the American archaeology establishment. Investigative journalism, not peer review.

fair enough, I admit I haven't read the book so the review is all can go at this time...
However, even the best archaeologists make a lot of assumptions on insufficient evidence, one of the points in Dewar's book. We can't blame them too much though, because everyone likes a story.
hmm ok but an archeologist does have much more to back their opinion than a journalist...it's not good procedure for an archeologist to do it either...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

fair enough, I admit I haven't read the book so the review is all can go at this time...

hmm ok but an archeologist does have much more to back their opinion than a journalist...it's not good procedure for an archeologist to do it either...

Yes for sure, but as you say, it is all opinion and it is almost a necessary thing to do. Otherwise, why bother with archaeology in the first place? That is, what public utility comes from it other than stories and narratives?

Posted

Yes for sure, but as you say, it is all opinion and it is almost a necessary thing to do. Otherwise, why bother with archaeology in the first place? That is, what public utility comes from it other than stories and narratives?

there are social and political consequences for getting it wrong...a lot of political strife today is the result past historical events that have been forgotten or misinterpreted and those myths are accepted by the general public tand passed on to their politicians...accurate history is important, accurate archeology is important in shaping public opinion and government policies...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted

there are social and political consequences for getting it wrong...a lot of political strife today is the result past historical events that have been forgotten or misinterpreted and those myths are accepted by the general public tand passed on to their politicians...accurate history is important, accurate archeology is important in shaping public opinion and government policies...

I agree there is a utility for archaeology, but as public utility, it can only come in the form of some sort of explanatory story or narrative and, as such, it is as fraught with the same problems as any literary form. There is a big difference between archaeological data and archaeological knowledge, with the former constantly modifying the latter.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...