Saipan Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 And he also lied to Parliament, just to push C-68 through in hurry. Then he kept lying about it to the end of his term in office. "Just" $2 million turned into $2 billion and C-68 is still neutered by amnesties since 1998. Because of total public disobedience Liberals had to announce amnesties to save face. Conservatives because of principle. Quote
Topaz Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 And he also lied to Parliament, just to push C-68 through in hurry. Then he kept lying about it to the end of his term in office. "Just" $2 million turned into $2 billion and C-68 is still neutered by amnesties since 1998. Because of total public disobedience Liberals had to announce amnesties to save face. Conservatives because of principle. So what makes you madder, the spending of the money OR having to register your gun? Quote
jbg Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 So what makes you madder, the spending of the money OR having to register your gun? Yes. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Saipan Posted March 21, 2011 Author Report Posted March 21, 2011 So what makes you madder, the spending of the money OR having to register your gun? No need to register. Read again. Quote
Jerry J. Fortin Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 The registry was and is a farce. Yet the concept is a valid one. Just goes to show you how even the best idea can go for crap if poorly implemented. Quote
Shakeyhands Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 This thread is so 205... Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Shwa Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 And he also lied to Parliament, just to push C-68 through in hurry. Then he kept lying about it to the end of his term in office. "Just" $2 million turned into $2 billion and C-68 is still neutered by amnesties since 1998. Because of total public disobedience Liberals had to announce amnesties to save face. Conservatives because of principle. Yeah but this is the *new* Liberal Party. Those things were all about Chretien and the Liberal Party got him replaced. Try and keep up. Quote
GWiz Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 Yeah but this is the *new* Liberal Party. Those things were all about Chretien and the Liberal Party got him replaced. Try and keep up. Awww come on now, give the Harperites a break, it's not like they have anything positive that they've done that they can show Canadians... Other than carping about a few Liberals errors they've got nothing to say... It's not like wasting around $70 BILLION with virtually nothing to show for it is gonna be something the Harper Regime wants to promote... Quote There are none so blind, deaf and dumb as those that fail to recognize, understand, and promote TRUTH...- GWiz
Shwa Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 Awww come on now, give the Harperites a break, it's not like they have anything positive that they've done that they can show Canadians... Other than carping about a few Liberals errors they've got nothing to say... It's not like wasting around $70 BILLION with virtually nothing to show for it is gonna be something the Harper Regime wants to promote... Hey, not so. Our city just had a major stadium upgrade and a new full sized indoor turf fieldhouse. Stimulus money is pretty nice. But then again, whose idea was it? Quote
Molly Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 (Well, if the conversation is to stoop to these partisan depths ....) $2 billion? The Harper GovernmentTM did that in a single weekend! Quote "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!" — L. Frank Baum "For Conservatives, ministerial responsibility seems to be a temporary and constantly shifting phenomenon," -- Goodale
GWiz Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 (Well, if the conversation is to stoop to these partisan depths ....) $2 billion? The Harper GovernmentTM did that in a single weekend! Inflation? Quote There are none so blind, deaf and dumb as those that fail to recognize, understand, and promote TRUTH...- GWiz
Saipan Posted March 21, 2011 Author Report Posted March 21, 2011 Yeah but this is the *new* Liberal Party. What's new? New ban of lawfully bought and registered firearms? That's old. It's so Chretien. Quote
Saipan Posted March 21, 2011 Author Report Posted March 21, 2011 It's not like wasting around $70 BILLION with virtually nothing to show for How about evidence? Quote
Shwa Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 What's new? New ban of lawfully bought and registered firearms? That's old. It's so Chretien. No, I think some nutcases shouldn't own firearms. There needs to be tighter restrictions especially for those that are so consistently and emotionally volatile about the issue. Quote
Saipan Posted March 22, 2011 Author Report Posted March 22, 2011 (edited) No, I think some nutcases shouldn't own firearms. I do too. That is why the National Firearms Association recommended stricter licencing for all, including police, civilians, guards and military. There needs to be tighter restrictions especially for those that are so consistently and emotionally volatile about the issue. I agree, someone like Allan Rock, Wendy Cukier or many Mohawks should never have firearm licence. Edited March 22, 2011 by Saipan Quote
Saipan Posted March 22, 2011 Author Report Posted March 22, 2011 $2 billion? The Harper Government did that in a single weekend! Liberals did it in one afternoon. And no results. Quote
Shwa Posted March 23, 2011 Report Posted March 23, 2011 I do too. That is why the National Firearms Association recommended stricter licencing for all, including police, civilians, guards and military. Well obviously the NFA is a total failure, they can't police themselves even, look at all the guns that are being used by criminals in Toronto. We need the registry to cut down on crime. Guns kill people. I agree, someone like Allan Rock, Wendy Cukier or many Mohawks should never have firearm licence. Don't forget to include yourself. Quote
Saipan Posted March 23, 2011 Author Report Posted March 23, 2011 Well obviously the NFA is a total failure, they can't police themselves even, look at all the guns that are being used by criminals in Toronto. Members of NFA are Jamaican Posies? I'm sure you can explain that one We need the registry to cut down on crime. So why the handgun registry accomplished nothing at all in over 70 years? I'm sure you can explain that one. Guns kill people. All my guns must be defective then. Wonder how that happen. Don't forget to include yourself. You think the guns are out to get me too? Why do you think most homicides don't involve any guns? Quote
Shwa Posted March 23, 2011 Report Posted March 23, 2011 Members of NFA are Jamaican Posies? I'm sure you can explain that one No, since they can't control guns or the people that use them, the government has to do it for them. Rightfully so, since they are so incompetent the government has to babysit. So why the handgun registry accomplished nothing at all in over 70 years? I'm sure you can explain that one. Because the NFA is so uncooperative. See above. All my guns must be defective then. Wonder how that happen. No, your guns are probably all fine. It is you who is shooting blanks. Which explains your fixation with guns. You think the guns are out to get me too? I don't think that, but from your paranois postings, I can see why you think they are. Why do you think most homicides don't involve any guns? The only people who need guns are the police and soldiers. Go hunt deer with knife. It be more sporting and entertaining. Especially with a full grown rutting buck. Quote
Saipan Posted March 23, 2011 Author Report Posted March 23, 2011 (edited) Because the NFA is so uncooperative. See above. Hunters, collectors, and competitors should do police work? Can you explain WHY? Are members of a sport club legally allowed to carry handguns and arrest criminals? No, your guns are probably all fine. They didn't kill anyone, so they must be defective according to your philosophy. The only people who need guns are the police and soldiers. Only in police state. Even Olympic competitors disagree with you. Go hunt deer with knife. Tell indians. But leave your engine running and car door open. You'll be leaving in a hurry. It be more sporting and entertaining. Especially with a full grown rutting buck. Is that how YOU get your beef. "Running with the bulls" Btw, do you NEED sports car that can far exceed speed limits? Edited March 23, 2011 by Saipan Quote
bloodyminded Posted March 23, 2011 Report Posted March 23, 2011 Tell indians. But leave your engine running and car door open. You'll be leaving in a hurry. Why? Are they racially prone to unreasoning violence when someone "tells" them something? Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Shwa Posted March 23, 2011 Report Posted March 23, 2011 Hunters, collectors, and competitors should do police work? Does gun ownership make them think they can? Can you explain WHY? Are members of a sport club legally allowed to carry handguns and arrest criminals? No, YOU explain. They didn't kill anyone, so they must be defective according to your philosophy. Nope, the guns are fine, you are the one shooting blanks. Only in police state. Even Olympic competitors disagree with you. Doesn't matter what Olympic competitors think, even for barbaric sports using guns. Tell indians. But leave your engine running and car door open. You'll be leaving in a hurry. Nope, they have a reason for sustenance hunting. You don't. Is that how YOU get your beef. "Running with the bulls" You should get yours in the supermarket like everyone else. Leave the hunting to those who know how to properly care for their guns. Btw, do you NEED sports car that can far exceed speed limits? Irrelevant. Quote
Saipan Posted March 23, 2011 Author Report Posted March 23, 2011 Why? Are they racially prone to unreasoning violence when someone "tells" them something? Deny them firearms and find out. There's enough violence even without you going there to tell them what they may or may not own. Quote
bloodyminded Posted March 23, 2011 Report Posted March 23, 2011 Deny them firearms and find out. There's enough violence even without you going there to tell them what they may or may not own. Nothing was said about denying them. You said that Shwa's suggestion (not an order) to "go hunt deer with a knife" would result in Natives getting violent if you merely said it to them. So...that's your view of the Native people, eh? Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.