Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Two top court seats at stake

The debate between Conservative Stephen Harper and Liberal Paul Martin over the Charter of Rights is more than campaign rhetoric. Whoever becomes prime minister will immediately get to fill two vacancies on the Supreme Court of Canada -- and perhaps tip the judicial balance on hot-button issues such as same-sex marriage for a generation. The only wonder, say academic experts, is the general public has yet to catch on to the high-stakes game. "This is such an incredible situation," says Lorraine Weinrib, a law professor at the University of Toronto. "Almost nothing could be more important. There is no question (Harper and Martin) would appoint different kinds of people."

Which party is going to jump on this one? :rolleyes:

An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you do know and what you don't.

Anatole France

Posted
Two top court seats at stake
The debate between Conservative Stephen Harper and Liberal Paul Martin over the Charter of Rights is more than campaign rhetoric. Whoever becomes prime minister will immediately get to fill two vacancies on the Supreme Court of Canada -- and perhaps tip the judicial balance on hot-button issues such as same-sex marriage for a generation. The only wonder, say academic experts, is the general public has yet to catch on to the high-stakes game. "This is such an incredible situation," says Lorraine Weinrib, a law professor at the University of Toronto. "Almost nothing could be more important. There is no question (Harper and Martin) would appoint different kinds of people."

Which party is going to jump on this one? :rolleyes:

Two appointments? Affect the court for a generation? Chretien appointed SIX judges to the court over just ten years. I don't think appointing two is going be a huge change.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Iacobucci was a Mulroney appointment. Arbour a Chretien.

If Harper makes PM, he has said he would ask the provinces for a list, presumably Quebec for Arbour, the four western provinces for Iacobucci, and then have a parliamentary committee approve his choice.

Can Martin say the same with any credibility?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...